ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

mato123 · 7 November 2016, 09:31 PM

Ceramic, it's nicer and looks contemporary.

jonnylax · 7 November 2016, 10:07 PM

Ive had both and I like my ceramic much much more

brandrea · 7 November 2016, 10:15 PM

Definately depends on the model ... I'm a walking contradiction

Islatate · 7 November 2016, 10:23 PM

For me, pre-ceramic for Subs and PM Daytonas. However, the new SS CE Daytona is hard to resist

breitlings · 7 November 2016, 10:46 PM

You need to wear a pre ceramic for a month to really decide.

beshannon · 7 November 2016, 10:51 PM

Both

Lemieux66 · 7 November 2016, 10:55 PM

Some of the pre-Cs do have some charm but the all round quality of the ceramics does it for me.

travisb · 7 November 2016, 11:04 PM

Depends. Mainly ceramic though.

gregmoeck · 7 November 2016, 11:19 PM

ceramic until it shatters

jmolsberg · 7 November 2016, 11:22 PM

Both are great but the ceramic gets my vote, just love it!

stone_gossard · 8 November 2016, 12:08 AM

My experience limited to 1406 and 114060. Just recently managed to try both on wrist. Interm of feels and look, I prefer ceramic as the watch looks bigger and looks great on my wrist. The pre ceramic one looks a bit smaller in size to my liking and yes the thin end link and clasp contributed on why I chose the ceramic.

Onikage · 8 November 2016, 12:16 AM

Pre. Though I haven't handled one the new Daytona might just be the only C model I prefer to pre. I've yet to try a SD4K too. I doubt I'll prefer it but it's still a nice watch.

JP Chestnut · 8 November 2016, 12:17 AM

Pre-C, and I'll pay more for equal condition.

sea-dweller · 8 November 2016, 03:03 AM

I like both, but the pre-ceramic models get the edge for me.

tommy91 · 8 November 2016, 04:53 AM

So judging by the pole, ceramic is favoured. I expected that but it is interesting to know. I wouldn't mind doing an age range poll aswel to see who is favouring ceramic and pre but I think that is going a step too far lol

tommy91 · 8 November 2016, 04:56 AM

From what I've read the new updates are aimed at middle age due to the better eligibility of the maxi dial. I am 25 and most of my freinds are around the same age and they all prefer ceramic models. Personally I always thought the ceramic models attracted younger Rolex enthusiasts due to the thicker cases and I expected older Rolex enthusiasts to prefer the pre ceramic. Just a thought I would be interested to know what age group voted for each.

TheRolexKingofLV · 8 November 2016, 04:56 AM

Ceramic

watchwatcher · 8 November 2016, 04:59 AM

Ceramic.

droptopman · 8 November 2016, 05:06 AM

I prefer the 4 and 5 digit sport models as they tend to fit my wrist better, but lately have been leaning back to the six digits. Not really because I prefer them, but more so for practicality. I worry too much about my vintage pieces so will not wear them the way I would a modern watch. May be time to get another 6 digit Sub.

Shopguy · 8 November 2016, 05:17 AM

I like them both in the sport watch realm. My D serial Coke GMT is amazing to wear and view. Fits great, stunning in all light conditions. My Subc date has a heft and bulk I like too - case and clasp impresses me every time I latch it. So I can't vote because if I had the funds I'd get a ceramic yellow gold GMT and a 5513 to add to the first two!

adawil2002 · 8 November 2016, 05:18 AM

I'm even between the two.

pampam · 8 November 2016, 05:26 AM

Ceramic cerachrome bezel insert 5 times stronger than steel aluminum.

locutus49 · 8 November 2016, 05:58 AM

Can't stop progress.

rolexnub · 8 November 2016, 06:00 AM

Ceramic

faz · 8 November 2016, 06:05 AM

I have the pre-ceramic bluesy and ceramic batman. I prefer the case and the overall elegance of the dial and bezel in pre-ceramic models. I think the larger case/hour markers/writing on bezel is making the newer models too busy, but that is just me.

Although the half link adjustment on the batman is a very nice option to have.

The Libertine · 8 November 2016, 06:14 AM

Pre-ceramic; never had an issue with the bracelets, prefer the case size and just think these will age better over the years.

SearChart · 8 November 2016, 06:16 AM

For me it's either vintage (four digit) or modern with ceramic bezel, I don't like the five digit Rolex watches, they are not as refined as the new ones but also lack the charm of vintage.

douglasf13 · 8 November 2016, 08:27 AM

While Rolex sport watches always incrementally changed over the years, the ceramic models changed so much at once that they're not even on my radar, despite buying all of my Rolex's during the ceramic era. I think it's Rolex's version of the Porsche air cooled/water cooled moment. Granted, the Daytona-c is the exception to me, because I never liked the previous polished bezel version, but I struggle to think of another ceramic model I'd even wear.

aekdb · 8 November 2016, 08:44 AM

Ceramic for me

GMT843 · 8 November 2016, 08:51 AM

New to the forum, really like what Rolex did with the ceramic bezel. Would someone please refer me to where I could buy from a member?

THANKS!

View Poll Results: Ceramic or pre ceramic?
Ceramic	223	67.78%
Pre ceramic	106	32.22%
Voters: 329. You may not vote on this poll

7 November 2016, 10:23 PM	#34
Islatate "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Ken Location: North of 49th Watch: 5980/1R-001 Posts: 1,078	For me, pre-ceramic for Subs and PM Daytonas. However, the new SS CE Daytona is hard to resist __________________ PP 5980/1R-001 PP 5146/1R-001 PP 5396/1G-001 AP 25940ok Rolex 116520

7 November 2016, 10:51 PM	#36
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,895	Both __________________ Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Glashutte Senator Exellence, Rolex 116710 GMT Master II BLNR, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent

8 November 2016, 12:16 AM	#42
Onikage "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: England Watch: 16710, 16628 Posts: 7,758	Pre. Though I haven't handled one the new Daytona might just be the only C model I prefer to pre. I've yet to try a SD4K too. I doubt I'll prefer it but it's still a nice watch. __________________ GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4

8 November 2016, 03:03 AM	#44
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	I like both, but the pre-ceramic models get the edge for me. __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

7 November 2016, 09:31 PM	#31
mato123 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Current Life Watch: Omega, IWC Posts: 95	Ceramic, it's nicer and looks contemporary.

7 November 2016, 10:07 PM	#32
jonnylax "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: virginia Watch: SDK4, President Posts: 182	Ive had both and I like my ceramic much much more

7 November 2016, 10:46 PM	#35
breitlings Banned Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Bethesda Watch: Apple TV Posts: 5,744	You need to wear a pre ceramic for a month to really decide.

7 November 2016, 10:55 PM	#37
Lemieux66 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2016 Real Name: Greg Location: UK Watch: $10 Casio Posts: 521	Some of the pre-Cs do have some charm but the all round quality of the ceramics does it for me.

7 November 2016, 11:04 PM	#38
travisb 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 32,218	Depends. Mainly ceramic though.

7 November 2016, 11:19 PM	#39
gregmoeck "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Maui Watch: Patek Posts: 2,032	ceramic until it shatters

7 November 2016, 11:22 PM	#40
jmolsberg "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Jan-Michael Location: Fort Worth Watch: ROLEX Posts: 423	Both are great but the ceramic gets my vote, just love it!

8 November 2016, 12:08 AM	#41
stone_gossard "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2016 Real Name: yusri Location: Osaka & Malaysia Watch: Sub n speed pro Posts: 81	My experience limited to 1406 and 114060. Just recently managed to try both on wrist. Interm of feels and look, I prefer ceramic as the watch looks bigger and looks great on my wrist. The pre ceramic one looks a bit smaller in size to my liking and yes the thin end link and clasp contributed on why I chose the ceramic.

8 November 2016, 12:17 AM	#43
JP Chestnut Banned Join Date: May 2012 Location: Ann Arbor MI Watch: Rolex Ref 16600 Posts: 3,908	Pre-C, and I'll pay more for equal condition.

8 November 2016, 04:53 AM	#45
tommy91 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Real Name: . Location: . Posts: 1,343	So judging by the pole, ceramic is favoured. I expected that but it is interesting to know. I wouldn't mind doing an age range poll aswel to see who is favouring ceramic and pre but I think that is going a step too far lol

8 November 2016, 04:56 AM	#46
tommy91 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Real Name: . Location: . Posts: 1,343	From what I've read the new updates are aimed at middle age due to the better eligibility of the maxi dial. I am 25 and most of my freinds are around the same age and they all prefer ceramic models. Personally I always thought the ceramic models attracted younger Rolex enthusiasts due to the thicker cases and I expected older Rolex enthusiasts to prefer the pre ceramic. Just a thought I would be interested to know what age group voted for each.

8 November 2016, 04:56 AM	#47
TheRolexKingofLV "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Real Name: Trace Location: Vegas/Bay Area Posts: 9,234	Ceramic __________________ Official Host "The Penthouse Party" Las Vegas 2018 Instagram @tracenunes

8 November 2016, 04:59 AM	#48
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 34,479	Ceramic.

8 November 2016, 05:06 AM	#49
droptopman "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Real Name: Mark Location: Washington State Watch: SUBS and GMT's! Posts: 9,664	I prefer the 4 and 5 digit sport models as they tend to fit my wrist better, but lately have been leaning back to the six digits. Not really because I prefer them, but more so for practicality. I worry too much about my vintage pieces so will not wear them the way I would a modern watch. May be time to get another 6 digit Sub.

8 November 2016, 05:17 AM	#50
Shopguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Location: Canada Watch: Black Submariner Posts: 185	I like them both in the sport watch realm. My D serial Coke GMT is amazing to wear and view. Fits great, stunning in all light conditions. My Subc date has a heft and bulk I like too - case and clasp impresses me every time I latch it. So I can't vote because if I had the funds I'd get a ceramic yellow gold GMT and a 5513 to add to the first two!

8 November 2016, 05:18 AM	#51
adawil2002 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2014 Real Name: Andrew Wilson Location: Brunswick, Maine Watch: 16550 Explorer II Posts: 1,762	I'm even between the two. __________________ 6284 SS, 16014 SS Jubilee silver stick, 16253 TT Blue Thunderbird, 16550 SS Exp II Cream, bought in 1986, 116400GV Z-blue Milgauss, 79260 Tudor, 116660 DSSD-Blue, 116500LV Daytona White, 116710 BLNR, 326934 Blue Skydweller

8 November 2016, 05:26 AM	#52
pampam "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: NYC Posts: 179	Ceramic cerachrome bezel insert 5 times stronger than steel aluminum.

8 November 2016, 05:58 AM	#53
locutus49 Banned Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: John Location: La Jolla, CA Watch: Platona Posts: 12,194	Can't stop progress.

8 November 2016, 06:00 AM	#54
rolexnub "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Real Name: Me & Papa Location: Echo Watch: ing TRF Posts: 3,428	Ceramic

8 November 2016, 06:05 AM	#55
faz "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Real Name: Faz Location: Bay Area, CA Watch: like'em all Posts: 4,655	I have the pre-ceramic bluesy and ceramic batman. I prefer the case and the overall elegance of the dial and bezel in pre-ceramic models. I think the larger case/hour markers/writing on bezel is making the newer models too busy, but that is just me. Although the half link adjustment on the batman is a very nice option to have. __________________ -Faz Instagram @fazmoto

8 November 2016, 06:14 AM	#56
The Libertine Banned Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: Mike Location: BOS Watch: 16710;14060;214270 Posts: 6,375	Pre-ceramic; never had an issue with the bracelets, prefer the case size and just think these will age better over the years.

8 November 2016, 08:27 AM	#58
douglasf13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: USA Posts: 5,615	While Rolex sport watches always incrementally changed over the years, the ceramic models changed so much at once that they're not even on my radar, despite buying all of my Rolex's during the ceramic era. I think it's Rolex's version of the Porsche air cooled/water cooled moment. Granted, the Daytona-c is the exception to me, because I never liked the previous polished bezel version, but I struggle to think of another ceramic model I'd even wear.

8 November 2016, 08:44 AM	#59
aekdb "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2016 Real Name: Jason Location: MS Watch: Rolex, Tudor Posts: 1,315	Ceramic for me

8 November 2016, 08:51 AM	#60
GMT843 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2016 Real Name: Will Location: Colorado Posts: 2	New to the forum, really like what Rolex did with the ceramic bezel. Would someone please refer me to where I could buy from a member? THANKS!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)