ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

b_hol · 8 November 2016, 11:28 AM

Is the new Daytona C that much better than the older style SS bezel? I think I kinda like the look of the SS bezel, just don't know about how prone it is to scratches.

traf · 8 November 2016, 11:33 AM

I think so!

But don't let that stop you from getting the older one in the mean time

Sent from my iPhone 7+ using Tapatalk

CLTRolex · 8 November 2016, 11:41 AM

If you look at the SS older bezel funny - it'll scratch.

T. Ferguson · 8 November 2016, 11:43 AM

Really, the two are different looking versions of the same watch. So whichever you like the looks of better, go with that.

But to answer your question, the steel bezel is certainly more prone to scratches than the ceramic one, which is very scratch resistant. But like the rest of the watch the RSC will polish it back to new at service.

Jake B · 8 November 2016, 11:44 AM

Prefer the looks of the SS and the scratch resistance of the ceramic.

Ruud Van Driver · 8 November 2016, 11:49 AM

I put a nasty scratch in the bezel of my SS Daytona. At first I was on the verge of self-harming but now I've learned to live with it; I've found the angle at which to look at the watch so that I don't see it when I look at the time

The dial is prone to scratches but it can be replaced here at RSC for S$400 (£235 US$290). Not exactly a drop in the ocean but not the end of the world either.

I'd rather have my 116520 and enjoy wearing it than spend 400 years on a waiting list for the C

Furrygoat · 8 November 2016, 11:59 AM

I'm debating this topic within myself too. The problem is, I haven't seen a C in person and am not sure I can easily see one. I'm on the list to get one supposedly sometime in 2017, but I just found a BNIB unsigned warranty, etc... white dial 116520 from another AD not too far away.

It's tempting to go get the new old stock, but I'm wondering if I'll be kicking myself when I finally see the C in person?

keschete · 8 November 2016, 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by b_hol

Is the new Daytona C that much better than the older style SS bezel? I think I kinda like the look of the SS bezel, just don't know about how prone it is to scratches.

I just got the Daytona C black face and I love it! I am going to also purchase a TT white dial with diamonds in a few months to compliment it. I like having old and new. They are all fantastic watches.

tkerrmd · 8 November 2016, 12:01 PM

They are both awesome watches....a Daytona in any version is a Daytona!

BLACKHORSE 6 · 8 November 2016, 12:02 PM

Aside from the bezel, the only other improvement Rolex made in my mind is the legibility of the sundials.

Was able to compare the black dial 116500 to my black dial 116520 at an AD several weeks ago, and the 500C subdials had bolder font and and real no shine to them. Much easier to read.

That being said, I still love my 116520 and don't think that it's worth the extra $ to get the 500C.

lig · 8 November 2016, 12:03 PM

+1 Dr. Tom.

All great.

Tools · 8 November 2016, 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by b_hol

Is the new Daytona C that much better than the older style SS bezel? . . .

"Better" !! You're missing the whole point.. It's new technology and something different, but it functions exactly like it always did, and likely isn't as durable.

The waiting lines and high prices have nothing to do with "better"

AK797 · 8 November 2016, 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by traf

I think so!

But don't let that stop you from getting the older one in the mean time

Sent from my iPhone 7+ using Tapatalk

New one does look pretty awesome, if this pic doesn't do it for you, you are def a SS man, you lucky devil!

douglasf13 · 8 November 2016, 12:31 PM

It's totally personal. For me, the Daytona C is the first Daytona I've been interested since the 4 digit references...and it's the first ceramic Rolex of any kind that I've been interested in, too. I think it's a home run.

rolexnub · 8 November 2016, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tools

"Better" !! You're missing the whole point.. It's new technology and something different, but it functions exactly like it always did, and likely isn't as durable.

The waiting lines and high prices have nothing to do with "better"

This

japenney · 8 November 2016, 12:45 PM

I don't think its better just different.

traf · 8 November 2016, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AK797

New one does look pretty awesome, if this pic doesn't do it for you, you are def a SS man, you lucky devil!

Cheers sir!

Sent from my iPhone 7+ using Tapatalk

s14roller · 8 November 2016, 01:19 PM

The non-C WILL scratch. I'm as careful as can be but hairlines show up no matter what and why I ultimately sold it. Daytona-C is on order now.

EddyG · 8 November 2016, 01:24 PM

They should have gone with this option......

Maybelline · 8 November 2016, 01:24 PM

I would love to have a new white face ceramic Daytona.

Maybe someday.

AS1 · 8 November 2016, 01:26 PM

looks better that's for sure

douglasf13 · 8 November 2016, 01:27 PM

To me, scratching is an non-issue on a steel watch. I think a well worn watch looks great. I'm just don't happen to like the look of the polished steel bezel.

ap1 · 8 November 2016, 01:30 PM

Yup

watchwatcher · 8 November 2016, 01:33 PM

Scratch resistant, for sure. Better? That's very subjective.

Oyster Al · 8 November 2016, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by traf

I think so!

But don't let that stop you from getting the older one in the mean time

Sent from my iPhone 7+ using Tapatalk

Absolute perfection.

gossbeau · 8 November 2016, 02:19 PM

I just flipped my 116505 because I didn't like the bezel. It is prone to scratches and the numerals fade easily no matter what you do. IMHO it doesn't gives a good contrast to the dial and kind of fades away. On the other hand, I love the gloss and sharpness of the ceramic bezels on Daytonas.
attachment-6.jpg

20160917_090214.jpg

I was going to do this modification but wound up not carrying it out. You can see it looks much better with the cerachrom bezel.
attachment-6.jpg

RUK · 8 November 2016, 02:27 PM

Depends if you like your watches to look worn or not. The SS looked well worn after a few years. The Ceramic will pretty much look the same. Love my white dial ceramic one

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk

Timesurfer · 8 November 2016, 02:49 PM

IMHO its like subs, GMT's, etc. Previous references vs new... Its just different... i like both, for different reasons... its a personal decision... ;-)

enjoythemusic · 8 November 2016, 03:01 PM

It's all one's personal opinion, and IMHO the ceramic bezel not only highly resists scratches, it looks more elegant too. SS bezels are scratch magnets.

Juantxo · 8 November 2016, 03:39 PM

Same movement, same case, same bracelet, different bezel. I like both but I think the steel bezel looks a bit better.

8 November 2016, 11:28 AM	#1
b_hol "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2015 Real Name: Brett Location: Houston Watch: 5167A / SD4K Posts: 57	Daytona C that much better than SS bezel? Is the new Daytona C that much better than the older style SS bezel? I think I kinda like the look of the SS bezel, just don't know about how prone it is to scratches.

8 November 2016, 11:41 AM	#3
CLTRolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Real Name: Robert Location: Charlotte/London Watch: Multiple Posts: 889	If you look at the SS older bezel funny - it'll scratch. __________________ ♕ Daytona - 116506 ♕ GMT-Master II - 116710BLNR ♕ Yacht-Master II - 116680 ♕ Daytona - 116520 ♕ Explorer II - 16570

8 November 2016, 11:43 AM	#4
T. Ferguson "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Left Coast Posts: 7,025	Really, the two are different looking versions of the same watch. So whichever you like the looks of better, go with that. But to answer your question, the steel bezel is certainly more prone to scratches than the ceramic one, which is very scratch resistant. But like the rest of the watch the RSC will polish it back to new at service. __________________ *Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.*

8 November 2016, 11:44 AM	#5
Jake B "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Hong Kong Watch: Gold Sub 116618LN Posts: 2,820	Prefer the looks of the SS and the scratch resistance of the ceramic. __________________ Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.

8 November 2016, 11:49 AM	#6
Ruud Van Driver "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Real Name: Chopped Liver Location: S. Wales Valleys Watch: Mickey Mouse Posts: 9,924	I put a nasty scratch in the bezel of my SS Daytona. At first I was on the verge of self-harming but now I've learned to live with it; I've found the angle at which to look at the watch so that I don't see it when I look at the time The dial is prone to scratches but it can be replaced here at RSC for S$400 (£235 US$290). Not exactly a drop in the ocean but not the end of the world either. I'd rather have my 116520 and enjoy wearing it than spend 400 years on a waiting list for the C __________________ 116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737 *"Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott* Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

8 November 2016, 11:33 AM	#2
traf "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Real Name: dave Location: miami Watch: me ride bikes Posts: 1,938	I think so! But don't let that stop you from getting the older one in the mean time Sent from my iPhone 7+ using Tapatalk

8 November 2016, 11:59 AM	#7
Furrygoat "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: Usa Posts: 428	I'm debating this topic within myself too. The problem is, I haven't seen a C in person and am not sure I can easily see one. I'm on the list to get one supposedly sometime in 2017, but I just found a BNIB unsigned warranty, etc... white dial 116520 from another AD not too far away. It's tempting to go get the new old stock, but I'm wondering if I'll be kicking myself when I finally see the C in person?

8 November 2016, 12:01 PM	#9
tkerrmd "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Tom Location: In a race car! Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES Posts: 24,123	They are both awesome watches....a Daytona in any version is a Daytona!

8 November 2016, 12:02 PM	#10
BLACKHORSE 6 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Dave Location: USA Watch: Rolex SS Daytona Posts: 2,623	Aside from the bezel, the only other improvement Rolex made in my mind is the legibility of the sundials. Was able to compare the black dial 116500 to my black dial 116520 at an AD several weeks ago, and the 500C subdials had bolder font and and real no shine to them. Much easier to read. That being said, I still love my 116520 and don't think that it's worth the extra $ to get the 500C.

8 November 2016, 12:03 PM	#11
lig "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: PacNW Watch: Enthusiast Posts: 2,605	+1 Dr. Tom. All great.

8 November 2016, 12:31 PM	#14
douglasf13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: USA Posts: 5,615	It's totally personal. For me, the Daytona C is the first Daytona I've been interested since the 4 digit references...and it's the first ceramic Rolex of any kind that I've been interested in, too. I think it's a home run.

8 November 2016, 12:45 PM	#16
japenney "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Real Name: Josh Location: Canada Watch: undecided Posts: 4,777	I don't think its better just different.

8 November 2016, 01:19 PM	#18
s14roller "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: US Posts: 3,246	The non-C WILL scratch. I'm as careful as can be but hairlines show up no matter what and why I ultimately sold it. Daytona-C is on order now.

8 November 2016, 01:24 PM	#19
EddyG "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Real Name: Eddy Location: Kent [London UK] Watch: 16628 Yachtmaster Posts: 378	They should have gone with this option......

8 November 2016, 01:24 PM	#20
Maybelline Banned Join Date: Jul 2016 Location: Gone Posts: 448	I would love to have a new white face ceramic Daytona. Maybe someday.

8 November 2016, 01:26 PM	#21
AS1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: NYC / Milan Watch: 6263 Posts: 3,938	looks better that's for sure

8 November 2016, 01:27 PM	#22
douglasf13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: USA Posts: 5,615	To me, scratching is an non-issue on a steel watch. I think a well worn watch looks great. I'm just don't happen to like the look of the polished steel bezel.

8 November 2016, 01:30 PM	#23
ap1 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: usa Posts: 19,045	Yup

8 November 2016, 01:33 PM	#24
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 34,479	Scratch resistant, for sure. Better? That's very subjective.

8 November 2016, 02:19 PM	#26
gossbeau Banned Join Date: Jul 2016 Real Name: Vinh Location: Lausanne/HCMC Watch: 25940ok Posts: 915	I just flipped my 116505 because I didn't like the bezel. It is prone to scratches and the numerals fade easily no matter what you do. IMHO it doesn't gives a good contrast to the dial and kind of fades away. On the other hand, I love the gloss and sharpness of the ceramic bezels on Daytonas. attachment-6.jpg 20160917_090214.jpg I was going to do this modification but wound up not carrying it out. You can see it looks much better with the cerachrom bezel. attachment-6.jpg

8 November 2016, 02:27 PM	#27
RUK "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Real Name: Ruk Location: .ie Watch: 5711,Sub,Daytona,P Posts: 1,232	Depends if you like your watches to look worn or not. The SS looked well worn after a few years. The Ceramic will pretty much look the same. Love my white dial ceramic one Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk __________________ 'The best watch out there is the one you like the most'

8 November 2016, 02:49 PM	#28
Timesurfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: 12,000+ Lakes! Watch: 16710 Daytona BLNR Posts: 840	IMHO its like subs, GMT's, etc. Previous references vs new... Its just different... i like both, for different reasons... its a personal decision... ;-)

8 November 2016, 03:01 PM	#29
enjoythemusic 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Real Name: Steven Location: Glocal Posts: 19,452	It's all one's personal opinion, and IMHO the ceramic bezel not only highly resists scratches, it looks more elegant too. SS bezels are scratch magnets. __________________ __________________ “Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming 'Wow! What a Ride!'” -- Hunter S. Thompson Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory.

8 November 2016, 03:39 PM	#30
Juantxo Banned Join Date: May 2016 Location: Utopia Posts: 2,101	Same movement, same case, same bracelet, different bezel. I like both but I think the steel bezel looks a bit better.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)