The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 December 2017, 01:48 AM   #1
Gimoozaabi
"TRF" Member
 
Gimoozaabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LBSF
Watch: ing the grass grow
Posts: 688
Icon5 Production date of F serial no. 16570T and 14060M

Hi all,


I've got an Explorer II, no holes case (T) and a Sub 14060M both are with F serial numbers. As the time frame for the F series production is rather large 2003-2005:

2003 / 2004 F (from Sept.)
2004 / 2005 F
2005 / 2006 F (until Apr.)

Source is:
https://www.oysterinfo.de/seriennummern-serial-numbers/

Is it possible to estimate when the watches are produced based on the first digits following the series letter?

For example the serial number of the Exp II starts with

F74[...]

I cannot check the number of the Submariner as the documents are at a different location and I will have to remove the bracelet. But in case this could be determined to some certainty I will provide the first digits of the Sub.

Thanks!
Gimoozaabi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 December 2017, 02:03 AM   #2
Gimoozaabi
"TRF" Member
 
Gimoozaabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LBSF
Watch: ing the grass grow
Posts: 688
The thread is empty without pics.



Sent from my MI 5 using Tapatalk
Gimoozaabi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 December 2017, 02:55 AM   #3
Nikrnic
"TRF" Member
 
Nikrnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,160
I believe the higher the serial NUMBERS are the later the production plus there are date codes on the clasp which was the last piece to be installed so that should get you as close as possible I believe. I do stand to be corrected. I had a 14060m K ser.no. 2001/2 high no. but my clasp was stamped DT which was feb.02 very end for the K .
Nikrnic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 December 2017, 03:53 AM   #4
mtgjr
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: Pepsi GMT
Posts: 2,926
That's a great combo. I wouldn't worry about pinpointing the production dates.
mtgjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 December 2017, 04:20 AM   #5
Gimoozaabi
"TRF" Member
 
Gimoozaabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LBSF
Watch: ing the grass grow
Posts: 688
Thanks!

Both clasps are stamped 'CL'.
The Sub clasp is 'CL04' and the EXP is 'CL10'. April and October?

Sent from my MI 5 using Tapatalk
Gimoozaabi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 December 2017, 05:24 AM   #6
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gimoozaabi View Post
Hi all, . . .


Is it possible to estimate when the watches are produced based on the first digits following the series letter?

. . .Thanks!
No, it is not. Even the dates you cite are nothing but guesses and not fact.

Rolex likely stamps serials in batches, then those cases are warehoused and produced as-needed. They are not produced sequentially (Dowling-Hess; 2002).

Chart "dates" are based on enthusiasts knowledge of when a model is first seen in the marketplace, same with clasp codes. They are not based on any knowledge or data from Rolex who does not provide production data.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 December 2017, 05:56 AM   #7
Gimoozaabi
"TRF" Member
 
Gimoozaabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LBSF
Watch: ing the grass grow
Posts: 688
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
No, it is not. Even the dates you cite are nothing but guesses and not fact.

Rolex likely stamps serials in batches, then those cases are warehoused and produced as-needed. They are not produced sequentially (Dowling-Hess; 2002).

Chart "dates" are based on enthusiasts knowledge of when a model is first seen in the marketplace, same with clasp codes. They are not based on any knowledge or data from Rolex who does not provide production data.
Thanks for the heads up! Good info. I knew that I wouldn't be able to pinpoint the month of the production but I wasn't aware that we cannot be too certain about the year as well.

Best is to correlate both case and clasp serial numbers.


Sent from my MI 5 using Tapatalk
Gimoozaabi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2018, 04:49 AM   #8
Gimoozaabi
"TRF" Member
 
Gimoozaabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LBSF
Watch: ing the grass grow
Posts: 688
I recently realised that my F serial Submariner is with the Fat (aka Flat) Four bezel. I would appreciate if someone share some info about these bezels. I know that the LV Sub ('Kermit') was equipped with this bezel to commemorate the 50 years of the Submariner production. How rare the Fat Four bezel?

Sent from my MI 5 using Tapatalk
Gimoozaabi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2018, 05:10 AM   #9
mtgjr
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: Pepsi GMT
Posts: 2,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gimoozaabi View Post
I recently realised that my F serial Submariner is with the Fat (aka Flat) Four bezel. I would appreciate if someone share some info about these bezels. I know that the LV Sub ('Kermit') was equipped with this bezel to commemorate the 50 years of the Submariner production. How rare the Fat Four bezel?
Really? I've never read that. Seems unlikely. I thought that was just the bezel font that Rolex employed during that period, which happened to coincide with the release of the 50th anniversary Sub (LV). I think you may be ascribing more significance to the "flat 4" insert than is there.
mtgjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2018, 05:19 AM   #10
Gimoozaabi
"TRF" Member
 
Gimoozaabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LBSF
Watch: ing the grass grow
Posts: 688
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gimoozaabi View Post
Hi all,


I've got an Explorer II, no holes case (T) and a Sub 14060M both are with F serial numbers. As the time frame for the F series production is rather large 2003-2005:

2003 / 2004F (from Sept.)
2004 / 2005F
2005 / 2006 F (until Apr.)

Source is:
https://www.oysterinfo.de/seriennummern-serial-numbers/

Is it possible to estimate when the watches are produced based on the first digits following the series letter?

For example the serial number of the Exp II starts with

F74[...]

I cannot check the number of the Submariner as the documents are at a different location and I will have to remove the bracelet. But in case this could be determined to some certainty I will provide the first digits of the Sub.

Thanks!
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtgjr View Post
Really? I've never read that. Seems unlikely.
I am referring to the shape of the number 4 on the bezel not the colour of course :)

Here is my 14060M compared to LV Fat Four and the 'regular 4'.


Sent from my MI 5 using Tapatalk
Gimoozaabi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2018, 05:20 AM   #11
tomchicago
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
These are among the last of the 5 digit references. They're keepers.
tomchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.