ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 March 2018, 12:03 PM | #91 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Abroad
Posts: 829
|
Quote:
However, if it bothers you, go to RSC and see what they say. But if you are talking about going for New Years (did I read that correctly?) that's another 10 months off so you will almost certainly have got used to the imperfections and the inevitable scratches by then. |
|
5 March 2018, 12:11 PM | #92 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mark P
Location: Toronto
Watch: SS Wimbledon DJ41
Posts: 2,046
|
Quote:
You'll have to forgive me and the other posters for jumping to a conclusion. I've owned Rolex watches for over 25 years and been reading this, and other horological forums for years so when this type of question comes up, usually - not always - but usually the poster *has* detected a flaw(s) under magnification, ie, a jewellers loupe or similar. In actual fact, many times - although by no means *always* - the so-called 'issues' turn out to be caused by unrealistic expectations or plain old human imagination. (Photos exhibit crooked crown or engraving on rehaut which is in fact distortion caused by crystal, camera, lighting, etc.) Time and time again folks think there's a problem but when discussed and / or investigated can be attributed to unrealistic expectations or a simple misunderstanding - like "Hey! My watch is defective: the crown doesn't line up straight when screwed down!" I'm not remotely suggesting anything of the kind in your case. I don't think your cyclops is crooked from the pix I've seen. The others flaws are awfully small, but if they upset you, well, by all means take action. You did pay good money for the watch and it's your prerogative to do what you must to correct them. But, please try to remember every time the watch is opened, it's exposure to *new* issues, sometimes more intrusive, is possible. We have a *LOT* of good, knowledgeable and patient people on this forum who only want to help you. Sometimes we get things wrong but the track record for resolution is excellent. The intention is and aleays will be Is to offer assistance to anyone that needs help, an opinion or simple guidance with regard to Rolex watches. These guys are smart, very helpful and believe me, they've - as the saying goes - SEEN AND HEARD IT ALL. I sincerely hope you 'get help' and your problems are sorted in a timely and efficient manner. After all, none of us likes being without our cherished watches. Good luck, keep us posted. Best, Marjk Sent from my SGH-I547C using Tapatalk |
|
5 March 2018, 12:12 PM | #93 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,356
|
|
5 March 2018, 12:24 PM | #94 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Mars
Posts: 1,683
|
Wait till scratches start appearing on the PCLs... enjoy your watch
__________________
|
5 March 2018, 06:02 PM | #95 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 127
|
|
5 March 2018, 06:09 PM | #96 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 127
|
Again Thanks for the replies from those who have read my comments properly , regards the car comments how about it you had bought your new car but then spotted a scratch inside the dials , and that your side mirror had been fitted at an angle. Would that be acceptable?
There was an earlier reply saying I have the three options Take it back to AD or RSC and see if they deem it a defect and repair under warranty Live with it Sell I've no intention to sell as this was my for life watch I can try and live with it sure , but understanding you can see these two things with the naked eye is this acceptable ? If I where to take it to the AD or RSC , how best would you advise I go about it ? I'm about a 4 hour trip to the AD , 12 hours from RSC ! Which is why I mentioned possibly waiting until I am visiting London at new years and call in rsc I understand the nothing is perfect comments , and microscopic bits and pieces I don't give a sod about . What I am saying is that these are visible to the eye , is this acceptable ? You can't compare scratches to defects however small on a 1 day only watch |
5 March 2018, 06:22 PM | #97 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,617
|
OP
Take it back to the AD and let them send it to the RSC for you. Rolex advertises "perfection" in their advertising, you are not being unreasonable if you ask for them to live up to their advertising. Best of luck. |
5 March 2018, 06:50 PM | #98 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: ing the Detectives
Posts: 1,885
|
good luck OP !
Nothing is truly perfect, but Rolex marketing suggests that they are...and if a Rolex is something you've been striving or saving for, a special purchase to reward yourself for some achievement, then it can be a disappointment to find your $10k watch has flaws you can spot with the naked eye. Just as you'd expect a $1000 watch to be a massive improvement over a $100 watch, a $10000 watch should be well bloody sorted. Perhaps a little less money on marketing and sponsorship, more on tightening tolerances ? |
5 March 2018, 06:57 PM | #99 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,360
|
I think you nailed it already for yourself. Since you are far away from the nearest RSC, sent it to them via your AD.
You might add the pictures to the work order to clarify for the watchmaker. To polish the little smudge out is going to be a very difficult job I assume. Personally I could easily live with it but I think it will keep on bugging you, so sent it in for peace of mind and see what response you get from the RSC. The RSC usually gives a quotation in writing, if sent via AD they will reply to the AD and not to you. Get this quotation from your AD so you can be sure they actually did sent it in.
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
5 March 2018, 07:10 PM | #100 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Asia
Posts: 187
|
i think being upset with small details like this is fully understandable. OC people will be bothered by these misalignment. and whenever you check the time, you can't help but notice that since you already know it.
|
5 March 2018, 07:20 PM | #101 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Andy
Location: England
Watch: with confusion
Posts: 626
|
If the cyclops miss alignment is so visible to the naked eye – why did you purchase the watch?
Am I missing something here? You noticed all the other ‘problems’ on the watches you inspected, yet you still leave the store with a watch you are not happy with – sorry I don’t get it |
5 March 2018, 09:37 PM | #102 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 127
|
Thanks guys, I think I will raise this with the AD.
Quote:
|
|
5 March 2018, 09:41 PM | #103 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
|
Perfection? They blast out a million watches a year, or around 4000 watches/day if we count a 5-day work week 52 weeks a year.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
5 March 2018, 10:16 PM | #104 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 127
|
Quote:
|
|
5 March 2018, 10:21 PM | #105 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,895
|
Yes
__________________
Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Glashutte Senator Exellence, Rolex 116710 GMT Master II BLNR, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent |
5 March 2018, 10:27 PM | #106 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,256
|
Rolex prices make it a Jewelry watch with Tool watch DNA. It's been quite a while since Rolex was simply a Tool watch, imho.
|
5 March 2018, 10:58 PM | #107 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona 116500
Posts: 93
|
Personally - what you are seeing on your watch would bother me. Misalignment at 12 o'clock of any element of the dial or bezel drives me nuts. As far as the marker, I had an IWC with an embedded dust particle in the dial. I had tons of scratches on that watch that didn't bother me, but I never got over that dust particle
I hope Rolex has higher standards than this forum and recognizes your concern and fixes the problem. This is a mass produced item and I can easily see how this one would slip through QC. That said, once the issue is identified, I would expect Rolex to want to fix the problem. |
5 March 2018, 11:20 PM | #108 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Leicestershire
Posts: 314
|
Quote:
Take some reference photos of your watch to show condition and take it to your AD for them to sort out with you. Please remember that your contract is with the AD not Rolex, it is therefore up to your AD to take up the definition of 'perfection' with Rolex - and refund / replace as required. That is what they are paid to do by Rolex via the margin they make selling you your watch! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
6 March 2018, 12:49 AM | #109 | |
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,379
|
Quote:
|
|
6 March 2018, 12:54 AM | #110 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: California
Posts: 555
|
You learn to live with the fact you've paid thousands for something that should be a certain way, but unfortunately it isn't. I bet it'll bug you that the bezel flutes don't center properly with the PIP or PIP triangle either.
I've learned to live with small imperfections and just enjoy my watches now. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
6 March 2018, 01:13 AM | #111 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Tony
Location: Orchard Park, NY
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 3,246
|
|
6 March 2018, 02:28 AM | #112 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Toronto, Canada
Watch: your attitude
Posts: 135
|
Imperfections add character. Cherish them :-)
|
6 March 2018, 02:34 AM | #113 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Las Vegas NV
Watch: 14060M COSC
Posts: 1,329
|
You are a victim of over-hype. Rolex watches are massed produced. About 800,000 per year. Sorry if the bubble burst but, that's it. If you want perfection. Try FP Jorne for around $100,000.00 give or take. All handmade, of course they only make about 25 all year.
|
6 March 2018, 02:48 AM | #114 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Dallas
Posts: 121
|
Quote:
|
|
22 March 2018, 10:24 PM | #115 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 127
|
Update : Rolex was sent to RSC by the AD.
They agreed the cyclops wasnt acceptable and have replaced the crystal under warranty. They say they can't do anything with the mark on the gold and that it is within tolerance , whether that's true or it's that they don't want to replace the dial over it is more what I would be inclined to think. So it's been returned to the AD with date mag alignment corrected but gold blemish left as Was, I have the option to either collect it as it is or they have offered a refund. Thoughts ? |
22 March 2018, 10:30 PM | #116 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 127
|
On a side note another has came in at another AD, date mag maybe a hair out but alignment is good. Of course there could be similar issues with marks on the gold that can only be seen in person
|
22 March 2018, 10:49 PM | #117 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago
Watch: explorer
Posts: 2,131
|
I think this is a personal and subjective choice... it seems like 50% of the members here beat their watches, to a certain degree, and don't even think about any type of imperfection. However, the other half of the group analyzes their watches with loops and spends more time taking pics than wearing their watch.
What I'm trying to say is you will gather replies that fall across the spectrum, but it really comes down to what YOU can be happy with, not just live with when it comes to luxury goods. I would have left it alone in the first place, since I fall in the first group and stressing over a watch would kill the fun for me. |
23 March 2018, 01:45 AM | #118 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Leicestershire
Posts: 314
|
Quote:
The blemish on the marker clearly bothers you and I'm surprised that Rolex haven't replaced the dial since they state that their approach ensures perfection - which this clearly isn't! Unfortunately the blemish isn't going to get any better with time so I'd suggest going for the refund and starting again whilst you can. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
23 March 2018, 02:35 AM | #119 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,639
|
Quote:
Your AD, by offering the refund, is agreeing with you that its not acceptable
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green. |
|
23 March 2018, 02:36 AM | #120 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,639
|
Get a refund and buy this one if its good
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.