ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 July 2020, 10:02 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: brazil
Posts: 29
|
Original not signed crown?ref 3468
hello im not sure about this crown. its not signed.
Is there a "must have" signature on these models? best regards |
6 July 2020, 12:25 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 501
|
Correct Not origina
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
6 July 2020, 12:45 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: mississippi river
Posts: 2,948
|
Should have a Calatrava cross. This watch had the same case ref #, different dial.
I believe it to be the original correct crown. |
7 July 2020, 12:59 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Real Name: Chris
Location: USA
Watch: ingMe,WatchingYou.
Posts: 1,462
|
i've owned a 3468, and although i'm not an expert by any stretch, i don't think that's an original crown.
will try to post pics when i get home matter of fact, i thought the 3468 had stick markers. could be there were multiple iterations, wrong caseback, or this has been frankened |
7 July 2020, 01:27 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: World of Patek
Posts: 304
|
Please do not post any pics on this thread. May be a fraud posting looking for info.
|
16 July 2020, 07:46 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: IE
Posts: 168
|
The watch looks like my 3512... With a different crown.
My 3512 is pictures in the holy Trinity thread for comparison Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.