ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

TitanCi · 2 March 2018, 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WJGESQ

To be honest--it's a bit boring.

Said only you...

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

rushca01 · 4 March 2018, 01:59 AM

Just so the highest ask for an SD4k that I’ve seen to date...11,495. That’s a significant jump if you ask me.

HL65 · 4 March 2018, 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rushca01

Just so the highest ask for an SD4k that I’ve seen to date...11,495. That’s a significant jump if you ask me.

Yesterday unworn and stickers $10,850: https://www.rolexforums.com/showthre...ghlight=116600

rushca01 · 4 March 2018, 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HL65

Yesterday unworn and stickers $10,850: https://www.rolexforums.com/showthre...ghlight=116600

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=588625

Glad I got mine!

aquatimerfla · 4 March 2018, 02:09 AM

Prices dont 'skyrocket' upon discontinuation.

The 16610LV is a lesson to all of us on how this works in the modern rolex era.

Lets discuss the 116600 again in 5-10 years

This isnt 'rocket' science. Excuse the pun.

zakattack62 · 4 March 2018, 03:28 AM

So I get and agree that the low production run is a plus for the SD4K. But please don't continually talk about how beautiful it looks aesthetically because if it did, it would still be in production.

karlsbad69 · 4 March 2018, 04:17 AM

It's cool in that it was a short run, but that was for a reason. It didn't sell. Holding one side by side with a 116610 the seadweller actually looks smaller.... in my opinion.

New one in 43mm is a perfect size.

aquatimerfla · 4 March 2018, 04:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zakattack62

So I get and agree that the low production run is a plus for the SD4K. But please don't continually talk about how beautiful it looks aesthetically because if it did, it would still be in production.

Its identical pretty much to the long production run 16600

The low production run was because of Rolexes decision to upsize to 43mm.

Thats it thats all. The 16600 is legend & the 116600 is just the modern version.

Bladeshot · 4 March 2018, 05:12 AM

I got an SD4000 at $7k, 18 months ago. I see an increase in current price levels at $9k+ and suspect they will gradually continue to increase.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Turnaround · 21 April 2018, 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by asiparks

The price has jumped up as the supply is now officially more finite, but once every collector who simply must have one, has one, I don't see it getting that much higher...

And this is EXACTLY why they will keep going up in value.

30 years from now, minimum wage will be +$20/hr in US, gas will be +$10/gallon and the SD4k will get prices of +$70k.

meganfox17 · 21 April 2018, 02:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladeshot

I got an SD4000 at $7k, 18 months ago. I see an increase in current price levels at $9k+ and suspect they will gradually continue to increase

I just had a chat with a local Seller who has a pre-owned SD4K( i think it's a 2016 unit ) up for sale. So I asked him what's it worth these days. He said US$ 11 650. Holy Crap !!!!

SC11 · 21 April 2018, 03:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by meganfox17

I just had a chat with a local Seller who has a pre-owned SD4K( i think it's a 2016 unit ) up for sale. So I asked him what's it worth these days. He said US$ 11 650. Holy Crap !!!!

In the UK I’ve seen private sales between £7,500 and £8,500 dealers at £9,000 plus.

ArthurB · 21 April 2018, 03:24 AM

I bought one for $6500 about a month before It was discontinued. So, yeah, it has already skyrocketed. I wish it would come back down so I can buy another. I refuse to pay these stupid current prices.

Turnaround · 5 June 2018, 07:04 AM

Well, some are working on it.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Rolex-New-S...AAAOSwrptbFUz2

dmash · 5 June 2018, 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turnaround

Well, some are working on it.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Rolex-New-S...AAAOSwrptbFUz2

hahahahahaha

037 · 5 June 2018, 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turnaround

Well, some are working on it.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Rolex-New-S...AAAOSwrptbFUz2

Is that priced in bitcoin?

turnleftgofast · 5 June 2018, 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lhawli

In relative terms, it wasn’t the most successful model and most people preferred the Sub. I don’t see that changing at all and now with the new SD43, the ones with bigger wrists have that to chose from where is the Sub is still the most popular.

PS. Not directed at OP but I’m really perplexed by the fascination people have with the thought of investments in watches. Even the LVc, BLNR, SD43 and DayC can still be had at MSRP. Only reason people paying over is the fact that they are not patient enough to wait for it at an AD. And if i think of the Pepsi, Coke and Kermit - they went up in value but after how many year and by how much? I can think of a few better ways to invest your $10k.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Many people can’t get onto those waiting lists at ADs as they’re closed, hence zero chance of MSRP.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

viper · 5 June 2018, 09:38 AM

Such a great looking piece, glad I could get one for a reasonable price when I did

Filipão · 11 June 2018, 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aquatimerfla

This thread is ridonkulous. 16610's bnib or unpolished are selling for more than what they sold for.

The 116600 is as no brainer as it gets. Its a 10000000000% lock to hold its value and increase significantly. Duh

The simple fact the Seadweller truly is a 40mm watch with no cyclops makes the 116600 THE last TRUE seadweller. SD43? nope....extra large sub...to refer to as a seadweller is blasphemous.

16610LV was selling for UNDER msrp first 2years once discontinued. This past year has shown extreme increases because of something Rolex has never done before and rampant speculation. Once the dust settles it does not change the simple fact that the SD4K has the shortest run in modern rolex history. History.

SD43 getting rid of red text?

SD4K. The last of the true sea dweller.

Have just bought one. NOS.

For €10,400.00 = US$12,300.00

Nothing beats the 116600 40mm. It's Rolex's 964.

My humble 2 cents.

Oh, and I'll be wearing the hell out of it. As always, tools tools tools.

Seibei · 11 June 2018, 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tgoddu

Would love to hear opinions as to why you believe the value hasn't gone crazy the past few months, and do you think it will ever?

Happy Friday!

They are just not that popular, however, if you buy them all up and hang on to them for a decade or two you might see the price rise significantly.

Quicksilver · 6 July 2018, 02:21 AM

Prices have risen significantly on this reference and probably will continue to do so. but don't expect quick, massive gains. It will be a slow process.

In my view the SD 4000 has all the makings of a future classic - short production run, lack of popularity when it was in production and the last of its kind (the current SD being a radical departure at 43mm with a cyclops). Its a gorgeous watch and the last of the Great Whites.

MinMay · 6 July 2018, 02:25 AM

too big for me...do not care for them. If it was 40mm, then I'll add it to my collection.

nachopc · 6 July 2018, 02:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MinMay

too big for me...do not care for them. If it was 40mm, then I'll add it to my collection.

Sd4000 is 40mm

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

hitman23 · 6 July 2018, 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MinMay

too big for me...do not care for them. If it was 40mm, then I'll add it to my collection.

hmmmm, then I suppose it will be added

KBM · 6 July 2018, 02:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MinMay

too big for me...do not care for them. If it was 40mm, then I'll add it to my collection.

Can't wait to see the pics!

007_Omega · 6 July 2018, 03:27 AM

Just too thick for me for a 40mm watch. The Sub is simply more versatile. SD43 is a different beast.

If I really need a Helium Escape Valve, then I'd probably enjoy the increased legibility of the SD43 anyway. I feel like 15mm thickness is better balanced by the 43mm case.

I do still think this watch has its merits. You get the function of a date without the cyclops which is huge for me. Now that I've had enough experience with the cyclops, I'm firmly in the anti-cyclops camp. I guess I wouldn't care with a Date-Just or a GMT (don't have a choice) but I really don't want that thing on a divers watch.

The matte dial is also cool. I prefer the gloss dial but I do think the matte has its merits. From a function perspective, the fully marked bezel is actually quite useful. Very easy to read your elapsed time and I actually find the countdown bezel to be the most useful function for daily activity.

The prices of these things have already shot up. Kind of a shame. I think this one could be quite valuable in the future, not just because of the small production run but also because I don't Rolex will ever make this watch in a 40mm size again.

You either have to go vintage or go with this small production run niche model to get the modern feel. If I had the $, I'd probably have snagged one of these and kept it in the safe.

MinMay · 6 July 2018, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kauebm

Can't wait to see the pics!

I learn something new today.

I thought they were 43mm.

Now, the search begins

HogwldFLTR · 6 July 2018, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MinMay

I learn something new today.

I thought they were 43mm.

Now, the search begins

SD4K = 40mm

SD43 = SD50 = 43mm.

SD43 is the first Rolex dive watch at that size and it's only been available a bit over a year. SD4K had a very short run hence the interest in their collectivity.

Quote:

Originally Posted by rushca01

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=588625

Glad I got mine!

You're not alone in that.

[QUOTE=rushca01;8335092]https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=588625

Glad I got mine!

Onequik135i · 6 July 2018, 08:59 PM

I had the chance to purchase a SD4K or my 114060 at a local AD back in Dec/Jan. They even offered it at $10250 if I recall the correct amount but passed after giving it some thought & chose the SubC for $7k before tax due to the top heavy feel of the SD4K. Now if it had been SD43 then that would have been a different story.

mistermann · 6 July 2018, 11:08 PM

The Sd4k has a really nice clasp to watch ratio, one thing I really love about the watch that nobody really mentions on here. Explorer I felt way out of balance, Submariner is close, but that little extra thickness of the Sd4k evens out the proportions. I might be crazy.

4 March 2018, 05:12 AM	#129
Bladeshot 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2015 Real Name: Grant Location: U.S. Watch: GMT 1675 PCG Gilt Posts: 5,718	I got an SD4000 at $7k, 18 months ago. I see an increase in current price levels at $9k+ and suspect they will gradually continue to increase. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Just another WIS who loves to trade...

5 June 2018, 09:38 AM	#138
viper "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Northeast Posts: 943	Such a great looking piece, glad I could get one for a reasonable price when I did __________________ 16610LV 16200 116600 116500

6 July 2018, 02:21 AM	#141
Quicksilver "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: David Location: London+Guangzhou Watch: ing watches Posts: 2,603	Prices have risen significantly on this reference and probably will continue to do so. but don't expect quick, massive gains. It will be a slow process. In my view the SD 4000 has all the makings of a future classic - short production run, lack of popularity when it was in production and the last of its kind (the current SD being a radical departure at 43mm with a cyclops). Its a gorgeous watch and the last of the Great Whites. __________________ Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M.

6 July 2018, 08:59 PM	#149
Onequik135i "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Tampa, Florida Watch: 116610LV Posts: 2,421	I had the chance to purchase a SD4K or my 114060 at a local AD back in Dec/Jan. They even offered it at $10250 if I recall the correct amount but passed after giving it some thought & chose the SubC for $7k before tax due to the top heavy feel of the SD4K. Now if it had been SD43 then that would have been a different story. __________________ 126710BLRO-0001 / 116610LV / 116613LB / Silver Snoopy / PAM24 / PAM111

4 March 2018, 01:59 AM	#122
rushca01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: Indiana Watch: GMT BLRO Posts: 1,741	Just so the highest ask for an SD4k that I’ve seen to date...11,495. That’s a significant jump if you ask me.

4 March 2018, 02:09 AM	#125
aquatimerfla Banned Join Date: Sep 2017 Location: FL Posts: 673	Prices dont 'skyrocket' upon discontinuation. The 16610LV is a lesson to all of us on how this works in the modern rolex era. Lets discuss the 116600 again in 5-10 years This isnt 'rocket' science. Excuse the pun.

4 March 2018, 03:28 AM	#126
zakattack62 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: London Ontario Ca Posts: 216	So I get and agree that the low production run is a plus for the SD4K. But please don't continually talk about how beautiful it looks aesthetically because if it did, it would still be in production.

4 March 2018, 04:17 AM	#127
karlsbad69 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Utah Posts: 72	It's cool in that it was a short run, but that was for a reason. It didn't sell. Holding one side by side with a 116610 the seadweller actually looks smaller.... in my opinion. New one in 43mm is a perfect size.

21 April 2018, 03:24 AM	#133
ArthurB Banned Join Date: Dec 2017 Location: Nowhere Watch: the Skies Posts: 78	I bought one for $6500 about a month before It was discontinued. So, yeah, it has already skyrocketed. I wish it would come back down so I can buy another. I refuse to pay these stupid current prices.

5 June 2018, 07:04 AM	#134
Turnaround "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Atlanta Posts: 186	Well, some are working on it. https://www.ebay.com/itm/Rolex-New-S...AAAOSwrptbFUz2

6 July 2018, 02:25 AM	#142
MinMay Banned Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: United States Posts: 2,410	too big for me...do not care for them. If it was 40mm, then I'll add it to my collection.

6 July 2018, 03:27 AM	#146
007_Omega "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2017 Location: Galaxy Watch: Explorer Posts: 897	Just too thick for me for a 40mm watch. The Sub is simply more versatile. SD43 is a different beast. If I really need a Helium Escape Valve, then I'd probably enjoy the increased legibility of the SD43 anyway. I feel like 15mm thickness is better balanced by the 43mm case. I do still think this watch has its merits. You get the function of a date without the cyclops which is huge for me. Now that I've had enough experience with the cyclops, I'm firmly in the anti-cyclops camp. I guess I wouldn't care with a Date-Just or a GMT (don't have a choice) but I really don't want that thing on a divers watch. The matte dial is also cool. I prefer the gloss dial but I do think the matte has its merits. From a function perspective, the fully marked bezel is actually quite useful. Very easy to read your elapsed time and I actually find the countdown bezel to be the most useful function for daily activity. The prices of these things have already shot up. Kind of a shame. I think this one could be quite valuable in the future, not just because of the small production run but also because I don't Rolex will ever make this watch in a 40mm size again. You either have to go vintage or go with this small production run niche model to get the modern feel. If I had the $, I'd probably have snagged one of these and kept it in the safe.

6 July 2018, 11:08 PM	#150
mistermann "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Real Name: Drew Location: Iowa Watch: 116600 Posts: 496	The Sd4k has a really nice clasp to watch ratio, one thing I really love about the watch that nobody really mentions on here. Explorer I felt way out of balance, Submariner is close, but that little extra thickness of the Sd4k evens out the proportions. I might be crazy.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)