ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
4 September 2011, 08:16 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
1680 White Dial Question
Hello All,
I'm new to the forum but have been collecting for a number of years. I would like to know if anyone knows the various dial makers for the 1680 white sub. The image below shows the four recognized dial variants (courtesy of VRF and watchblog.dk). From what I have gathered by reading various info on the net: Mark I: Lemerich Mark II: Beyeler Mark III: ? Mark IV: ? Here's my watch below. It is the Mark IV dial in a 5.5 mil serial. It has the more pronounced open 6's: Here's a post with the same dial in a 5.8 mil serial: http://www.network54.com/Forum/20759...e+dial+archive Thanks to anyone who can provide good info which would avoid me pulling the hands and dial off the watch. . Kayvan |
5 September 2011, 02:51 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
No one :-(
|
5 September 2011, 12:28 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: London, Ont.
Posts: 666
|
Not sure I understand what your asking? You seem to have figured it out? Hopefully someone will reply
|
5 September 2011, 02:38 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,218
|
I saw your post on the VRF and found it interesting. I have a vintage 1978 Submariner 1680 and my dial is not like the one you pictured. The dial on my watch pictured is a one owner and is still original to the watch.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
5 September 2011, 05:21 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
Hi Springer,
Thanks for replying. Very nice patina on your 1680! I guess your's would be the Mark III dial. What are the first digits of the case serial number on your watch? As with Rolex, there's always overlap. There's currently a 5.4mil serial watch on e-bay with the Mark IV dial like mine and in the VRF dial archive there's a 5.8mil serial as well. Kayvan |
5 September 2011, 05:23 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
|
5 September 2011, 08:40 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: italy
Posts: 991
|
paging Markku Alen ( "volevo far il fico ma ho fatto solo casino " ... that sounds something like " I wanted to be smart .. but I have just created a lot of confusion " LLLOOLLL )
here are the white dials for 1680 : 1) mk1 ( Lemrich ) ; note the "centered L" under the Rolex crown : 2) mk2 ( Beyerle ); the letter L is not centered : 3) mk3 ( Lemrich ) ; also in this one the L is still centered : (this is Markku ... ) thanks to SM for the 3rd picture. Last edited by HL65; 10 September 2011 at 08:44 AM.. |
5 September 2011, 09:15 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
Que casino vero ;-)
Thanks for the info. We're almost there. What about the Mark IV? Who makes that one? That's the one I'm really interested in! |
5 September 2011, 11:12 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
|
Mine is a 5.3
|
5 September 2011, 11:21 PM | #10 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,218
|
Quote:
Kayvan, my serial number would be 58XXXXX for the 1680.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
|
6 September 2011, 12:03 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
Thanks guys. The plot thickens...
IMHO I think there could be a revamping of Mark X versions necessary as: 1. Frogman's Rolex has a Mark I dial according to the list and yet the 5.3mil serial would put it in the '77-'78 range. So if we go according to the dial list it should have at least a Mark II I believe. 2. Springer has a Mark III and his serial is 5.8mi which would put it at late '78 to early '79 so looks OK according to the list. 3. I have a Mark IV with a 5.5mil which is older than Springer's (mid '78). 4. The other Mark IV dial belonging to Beaumont Miller and catalogued in the VRF dial archive is a 5.8mil so late '78 early '79. 5. There's a Mark IV 5.4mil on e-bay right now so mid '78 like mine. The 1680 was made till 1980. Then again, I guess there's always the daunting Rolex overlap issue... Anyone else who has white 1680 knowledge and would like to contribute is welcome. Kayvan |
6 September 2011, 01:54 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
|
I have the same MK IV dial on my 1680. It is in the dial archive on VRF. Before I bought the watch I did some checking around and this is what I found. It is one of the least common 1680 white dial variations. Both Eric Ku and Andrew Shear have sold 1680's with this dial variation. Watches were complete with box and papers. So, authenticity/originality not an issue for me. Some think this dial is a service dial but on the packages just mentioned, service papers weren't shown. I have seen pictures of a luminova version of this dial.
__________________
|
6 September 2011, 02:13 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
Thanks for chiming in Beaumont. You're just the guy I wanted to hear from since you started this mess in the first place
Any idea what the serials were on Andrew and Eric's watches? I'm thinking of compiling some info on this dial as it seems to be a rare one. I think maybe people see it as a service dial because it looks so different to the others. I also admit that when I first saw it I had my doubts because of the open 6's and fonts. I saw a couple others on Chrono24 but unfortunately not much serial number info. Anwyay, that's the fun of Rolex vintage. Some new piece of info always pops up! |
6 September 2011, 02:54 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Dick Clark
Location: Los Angeles CA
Watch: 1680/8 Submariner
Posts: 59
|
Cloudy with a chance of showers
There is certainly a clearing trend on the variety front but the storm has not passed regarding date ranges.
|
6 September 2011, 03:00 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
|
If you wanted me to add to the confusion, all you had to do was PM me... I changed my post to reflect the fact that Andrew has updated his website and the pic is no longer there. I think both watches were from around 1978 as is mine. My gut feeling is that this dial was the one or one of the ones used toward the end of the production run. I am not convinced it is a service dial because I have never seen them on earlier serial numbers like three and four million. When I posted the question on VRF, I didn't get much help. I think because compared to it's red counterparts, the white dial version doesn't spark as much passion.
__________________
|
6 September 2011, 03:31 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
Quote:
That being said, it makes things more interesting for us to investigate the reality. Whatever the case may be, the Mark IV has the best open 6's of any white dial. I think we should start calling it the Mark 3.5 since most of the watches we've been seeing tend to be in the 5.3-5.8 serial range. Diver Dick, Your's is clearly a Mark I dial but the 5.97 serial range puts it at 1979-80. To me there's zero question as to its authenticity being such pristine B+P piece. As I've said earlier, my conclusion is to question the commonly accepted knowledge concerning white dial "Mark" numbers. Sweet watch by the way! |
|
6 September 2011, 03:55 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: italy
Posts: 991
|
I have simple written that in mho there are 3 different dials contemporary to the time of production for white 1680 .
in any case the only thing to do is to check how is punched the back of the dial : this will say above any doubt if a dial is a replacement or not. |
6 September 2011, 04:11 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
Thanks Beaumont. Yes, this is a pitty that there's racism against the whites within the collector community
That being said, it makes things more interesting for us to investigate the reality. Whatever the case may be, the Mark IV has the coolest open 6's of any white dial. Maybe we should start calling it the Mark 3.5 since most of the watches we've been seeing tend to be in the 5.3-5.8 serial range. Diver Dick, Your's seems to clearly be a Mark I dial but the 5.97M serial range puts it at 1979! To me there's zero question as to its authenticity being such pristine B+P piece. Sweet watch by the way! Regardless of this Mark IV issue, it seems that we should question the commonly accepted knowledge concerning white dial "Mark" numbers. Marcello, What should one see at the back of such a replacement dial? I am trying to avoid ripping the hands and the dial off my watch but if I have to I will. |
6 September 2011, 04:39 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: italy
Posts: 991
|
replacement dials can be punched "ROLEX" in many different ways depending on the time of production.
in any case your dial looks like the mk3 I have posted. |
6 September 2011, 05:50 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
|
In the OP original pic the L is further to the left under the coronet and the HRO in CHRONOMETER line up over the CER in CERTIFIED. Marcello you may be right. Perhaps a pic of the back of the dial will uncover some clues. Go for it Roro.
__________________
|
6 September 2011, 06:57 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
That's right Beaumont, fully agree on the L and HRO CER alignment.
Other Mark IV vs. Mark III differences I see: 1. The coronet is different altogether 2. The Swiss - T < 25 is closer to the tick marks And last but not least: 3. The VERY open 6's That is not to refute that it could be a replacement but IMHO it is not the same as a Mark III. To add more fuel to the fire, I've combed Chrono24 and e-bay and found a handful of examples of this dial (amonst many white 1680's) and they all seem to be in the 1978 serial range. Strange coincidence if its a service dial... Thanks for the tip Marcello. I'll see about taking the dial off in the next few days (to add some suspense). If its a service dial, I'm buying drinks next time you're in Paris otherwise its a nice bottle of Valpolicella in Italy Kayvan |
6 September 2011, 07:57 AM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
|
My 1680 I bought from Eric Ku and I was told that it was all original and dead stock. I fully believe it left Rolex factory with the MKI dial and a 5.3 serial case.
|
6 September 2011, 08:39 AM | #23 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,505
|
|
6 September 2011, 10:01 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
Ditto. That watch is crisp Frogman! Dead stock is right.
Be back with more info tomorrow. Kayvan |
6 September 2011, 10:03 AM | #25 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,218
|
Here is one more for you to look at and see if you can tell what it is. I'll check back later and post what I know about this dial.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
6 September 2011, 11:48 AM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
|
|
6 September 2011, 12:54 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
|
Here is mine with the black nato band:
__________________
|
6 September 2011, 05:46 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
|
6 September 2011, 05:56 PM | #29 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
Quote:
I've seen this dial before. To me, it looks like either an early 80's dial or a luminova service dial. Maybe this should be called the "Mark V"? Here are a couple more of these "Mark V" dials I've dug up: A. http://www.chrono24.fr/rolex/rolex-s...ch%2Findex.htm B. http://www.chrono24.fr/rolex/submari...ResultIndex=76 Looking forward to having your thoughts. |
|
6 September 2011, 07:49 PM | #30 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: italy
Posts: 991
|
Quote:
such as : ( Lemrich dial btw ) |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.