ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 December 2012, 01:11 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: SWFL
Posts: 359
|
Date or No Date?
I posted last week looking for advice about trading my 116234 DateJust for a 16610 Submariner. I am leaning toward doing the trade, but I am now considering a 14060 Sub because I never could read the date on my Datejust without my reading glasses. The date function is almost useless for me. So, is the 14060 just as desirable as the 16610?
Thank you! |
7 December 2012, 01:18 PM | #2 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 116710 BLNR
Posts: 34,347
|
I think the 14060 is more desirable, but that's just my personal preference and may not describe most people's view.
What I'm wondering though is why you're not wearing progressive or bifocal glasses, if your vision is that impaired. I do know what you're talking about though. The cyclops is perfectly useless to me without my glasses and I can barely read the time without them, too.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
7 December 2012, 01:24 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,950
|
I love my 14060. I have the non-COSC version. I love the clean dial.
__________________
|
7 December 2012, 01:25 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DM[V]
Watch: 16710 | 16600
Posts: 3,546
|
If useless, no date. Easy peasy. Please post wrist shots when you do decide.
|
7 December 2012, 01:27 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: SWFL
Posts: 359
|
Quote:
|
|
7 December 2012, 01:28 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: SWFL
Posts: 359
|
|
7 December 2012, 01:32 PM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,870
|
14060 is so easy to read!
|
7 December 2012, 01:38 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Adelaide
Watch: 14060 Sub
Posts: 332
|
Many people lean towards a Sub-Date because of the functionality but will concede that the Submariner is the nicer looking of the two. I generally only need to look at a date every two or three days, and even then if I use a bit of brain power I can usually deduce what it is. I just can't see how anyone could say that a date function is essential - if they are being honest with themselves.
Now if you like the aesthetics of the date better then that's another matter entirely. |
7 December 2012, 01:43 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Adelaide
Watch: 14060 Sub
Posts: 332
|
..and another
|
7 December 2012, 01:45 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Heath
Location: Lawrenceburg KY
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 3,982
|
I love and have both the sub date and sub. Personally, I like the sub date better because I am used to having and looking at the date but I also like the clean look of the sub. It all comes down to personal preference and what you like.
Post up pics when you decide
__________________
“You may delay, but time will not.” ― Benjamin Franklin |
7 December 2012, 01:45 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,594
|
I chose date!
Why not keep the 116234? I bought that first then a 116610 after for casual days. |
7 December 2012, 02:07 PM | #12 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 DATE-JUST41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tony Geha
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Yacht-Master
Posts: 49,223
|
If you're single go for a date otherwise No date
__________________
Instagram @JustRolexes 2FA security active |
7 December 2012, 02:08 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Matte
Location: Toronto
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,006
|
i used to have a sub date, as i felt at the time that a date was a mandatory feature of any watch i owned.
i have since seen the light no date is simply perfect :) |
7 December 2012, 02:13 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: USA
Watch: A few
Posts: 8,852
|
If you don't use the date then go with dateless, it's a nice clean look. However I use the date on all of my watches often so it's a feature I definitely like.
|
7 December 2012, 02:42 PM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1,125
|
I love the clean look of 14060, 14060M, 14060M COSC, or 114060M.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
7 December 2012, 02:58 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: United States
Watch: Overseas
Posts: 992
|
No date
|
7 December 2012, 05:41 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sweden
Posts: 791
|
Why no date? its important. I vote date.
__________________
Submariner 116613 "Flat" First serial "V" 116610V Hulk |
7 December 2012, 05:43 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sweden
Posts: 791
|
Just read what ya wrote :) yeah then its does not matter which route you go since with or without date is the same to you. Choose which one you like the best
__________________
Submariner 116613 "Flat" First serial "V" 116610V Hulk |
7 December 2012, 06:20 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
|
The 14060 is more desirable to those that like it.
The 16610 is more desirable to those that like it. So the question really is which group do you think you belong in (irrespective of the size of each group)? Personally, I think the 14060 looks better, but I would still choose the 16610. For me, the extra functionality of the date is enough of a draw card. Good luck deciding! Last edited by Bangel; 7 December 2012 at 06:21 PM.. Reason: Addition |
7 December 2012, 06:26 PM | #20 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,501
|
if you don't "need" the date, then, the submariner (i.e., no date) is the way to go for sure. so clean and well-balanced.
|
7 December 2012, 06:29 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: West
Watch: Day-Date
Posts: 932
|
14060
Check the date on your mobile phone. |
7 December 2012, 10:26 PM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Mass/Vegas/disney
Watch: Hulk,114060,14060
Posts: 929
|
For me the no date is far more desirable
|
7 December 2012, 11:15 PM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Detroit Michigan
Watch: 18078
Posts: 1,142
|
There is nothing like the flat clean surface of a sub.
|
7 December 2012, 11:30 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Midlands
Posts: 1,515
|
It's beyond me why people need to be constantly reminded what date it is. Days are pretty simple. Today is yesterdays date + 1.
A watch has a purpose because time is funny. Sometimes when I'm sat in class 10 minutes can feel like an hour and when I'm playing football manager 4 hours can fly by in what seems like less than one. That's why I need to know the time. It's one date, I go to sleep and wake up and it's the next date. I also check my planner every morning and when I saw this morning it was the 7th I could tell you all day that it was the 7th even with my ND on my wrist. If you prefer the date by all means go for it but for me the date isn't a very useful complication. Also dislike the cyclops on a Sub. Love it on a DJ but on Sub and Explorer II I'm not a fan. |
7 December 2012, 11:33 PM | #25 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 3,212
|
Quote:
|
|
8 December 2012, 12:08 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 685
|
__________________
Bell & Ross: BRS-98S Casio: G-Shock GW-5000 / DW-5040 40th / DW-5035D 35th / DW-5030C 30th / DW-5025D 25th / DW-5000SP 20th / DW-5600C-9CV / Marlin W-150 / W-450 / W-30 Panerai: Luminor 000i Seiko: SBGX117 / SBGX335 / 7548 / SNE543P1 |
8 December 2012, 01:34 AM | #27 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,793
|
Aesthetically the Sub dial is so much more beautiful without the date and cyclops. I've written this many times, but just use your bezel for the date. Set the bezel to the minute-marker of whatever day it is, so today your bezel is set to "7." Voila, your ND Sub CAN tell the date!
|
8 December 2012, 01:38 AM | #28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Midwest
Posts: 746
|
Quote:
|
|
8 December 2012, 02:44 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Sherwood Park, Ab
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,509
|
Yep, another vote for here for the sub. As for desirability, they both are, so there's no bad choice between them.
|
8 December 2012, 02:48 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Manny
Location: MA
Watch: DD,Sub,GMT,Daytona
Posts: 4,448
|
Date all the way
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.