The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 May 2011, 04:32 AM   #31
KingJames
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danand View Post
Huh? Not following what you are saying?..
ED HARDY = Trendy Fad, wares off with time
TT ROLEX = Classy, refined, timeless (obviously this is my opinion)

You get it now?
KingJames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 04:32 AM   #32
cornerstore
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,999
It is an economic thing, as gold climbed some people felt embarassed showing their good fortune while others lost out.
cornerstore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 04:41 AM   #33
gimpex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Greg
Location: Austria
Watch: Sub C LV / Exp II
Posts: 609
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrick09 View Post
It is an economic thing, as gold climbed some people felt embarassed showing their good fortune while others lost out.
I have seen this arguement in numerous posts on TRF and I do not understand it.

How is a watch more in your face than a car or a house for example ( among all other things) ??

Assuming you are in the fortunate category , do you sell your house so people dont think you are better off than others ? Do you sell your car and get a scooter ? Do you not go to your favourite restaurant ? You go but order burger instead of steak in case a neighbour sees you ???

Besides those really interested in watches ( maybe 1 % of population ) , I doubt most people give the watch a second glance... and if they do, how many care.... and if they do care how many think it might not be real.

Just be yourself !
gimpex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 04:43 AM   #34
moviefreak
"TRF" Member
 
moviefreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: in my house...
Posts: 5,524
[QUOTE=gimpex;2510534]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bananas View Post
TT is a dated 80's look, and you are just advertising the fact that you can't afford the full gold version.

QUOTE]

So what does it say if you wear SS - that you can't even afford half gold ???
__________________
Cheers, Eduardo
Be a WIS not a WUSS... and remove all the stickers..
moviefreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 04:44 AM   #35
Danand
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Ottawa
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingJames View Post
ED HARDY = Trendy Fad, wares off with time
TT ROLEX = Classy, refined, timeless (obviously this is my opinion)

You get it now?
Must be a generational thing but have never heard of "Ed Hardy" as a term, don't know who he is. So your statement looked like gibberish to me.

As far as classy, refined, timeless that is just a matter of opinion. There are a few posters above that seem to indicate that TT is less than classy and rather dated (80's). To each his own.
Danand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 04:46 AM   #36
RRGHOST1
"TRF" Member
 
RRGHOST1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,900
Well i love the TT models, and to say it says you cant afford gold is the same as saying getting a SS model shows you cant afford WG. Its just in fashion to wear SS at the moment, and it seems to me anyone who differs from wearing a SS is seen as old fashioned or weird. The only way years ago to get on the Rolex ladder was to get the cheapest model and that invariably was the SS. I find it quite amusing the people who wouldn't be seen dead with a TT as if it has some kind of stigma attached to it. Also amusing the people who wouldnt wear a TT blue Sub but love the WG model as from a distance it could be an SS model. This is just my opinion anyway.
RRGHOST1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 04:50 AM   #37
ArcticMoose
"TRF" Member
 
ArcticMoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Sea
Posts: 1,894
Well, if you don't want them, I'll be happy to take them all off your hands! :-)

ArcticMoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 04:51 AM   #38
buke45
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Ponce, PR
Watch: Your Butt
Posts: 1,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duey View Post
I have to admit I prefer SS myself. Just find it odd that SS is worth more than ss/gold!
Which SS is worth more than TT exept Daytona?
buke45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 04:53 AM   #39
Scunner
"TRF" Member
 
Scunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Ian
Location: Lanarkshire, SCOT
Watch: the Weather
Posts: 257
Quote:
Originally Posted by buke45 View Post
Which SS is worth more than TT exept Daytona?
Vintage Sports.
Scunner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 04:55 AM   #40
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 25,995
1 reason: check the price of a replacement bracelet for a TT vs SS.

HUGE.
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 04:59 AM   #41
speedo
"TRF" Member
 
speedo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: bp, hu, eu
Watch: dj 16234, 116610ln
Posts: 2,376
Have no prejudice just don't like the look of yg at all. Though i do fancy the tt gmtc. Go figure.
__________________
16234 jubilee dial, 116610 ln, grand seiko sbgm221g, omega speedmaster mark II, longines legend diver, breguet 3910, nomos club campus 38, swatch sistem51, mares nemo, seiko ripley, g-shock rangeman

instagram: modus_horologicus
speedo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 05:01 AM   #42
Puffy
"TRF" Member
 
Puffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
they usually have stretched bracelet and the gold tends to have nicks and dings - and who would want that?
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten
Puffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 06:00 AM   #43
The Joker
"TRF" Member
 
The Joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gotham
Posts: 9,634
[QUOTE=gimpex;2510534]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bananas View Post
TT is a dated 80's look, and you are just advertising the fact that you can't afford the full gold version.

QUOTE]

So what does it say if you wear SS - that you can't even afford half gold ???
I don't think it says that at all. Time has shown that all things considered, SS is the best material for a watch. Look, durability. Obviously price is a factor, but regardless of this not everybody wants a gold watch.

I think gold only works in certain circumstances, SS always looks great.
The Joker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 06:18 AM   #44
Megalobyte
"TRF" Member
 
Megalobyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Ari
Location: Florida
Watch: ...me go broke
Posts: 2,428
I don't dislike TT Rolexes, but prefer SS. Truth is, when I think of "too tone" watches, I picture a hairy chested 65 year old guy from Long Island who reeks of Pierre Cardin, sporting a ridiculous dyed black comb-over.

Oh crap, that's my stepfather Marty! (who won't wear any watch that's NOT
TT, they go well with his 70's leisure suits, he's vintage.)
Megalobyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 06:36 AM   #45
L-16610
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Watch Professor View Post
Not too popular in the US, but more popular in Europe. Why? Good question.
In Europe ??
No way !
Steel or 100% gold but nut the mix
L-16610 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 06:38 AM   #46
Puffy
"TRF" Member
 
Puffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by Megalobyte View Post
I don't dislike TT Rolexes, but prefer SS. Truth is, when I think of "too tone" watches, I picture a hairy chested 65 year old guy from Long Island who reeks of Pierre Cardin, sporting a ridiculous dyed black comb-over.

Oh crap, that's my stepfather Marty! (who won't wear any watch that's NOT
TT, they go well with his 70's leisure suits, he's vintage.)
it's funny cos it's true!!

http://youtu.be/8DYje57V_BY
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten
Puffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 06:39 AM   #47
hawg
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 263
In good shape there is nothing like a TT shining in the light. I don't think it is a cost factor like mentioned earlier. Very Classy. I don't think it says that gold and stainless together means you are not well enough off to get the full gold. Maybe it means you are better off than the guy who just buys stainless. All kidding aside it really doesn't matter what model one has, it is to each their own.
hawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 06:50 AM   #48
The Joker
"TRF" Member
 
The Joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gotham
Posts: 9,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexplorer2 View Post
Well i love the TT models, and to say it says you cant afford gold is the same as saying getting a SS model shows you cant afford WG. Its just in fashion to wear SS at the moment, and it seems to me anyone who differs from wearing a SS is seen as old fashioned or weird. The only way years ago to get on the Rolex ladder was to get the cheapest model and that invariably was the SS. I find it quite amusing the people who wouldn't be seen dead with a TT as if it has some kind of stigma attached to it. Also amusing the people who wouldnt wear a TT blue Sub but love the WG model as from a distance it could be an SS model. This is just my opinion anyway.
Is SS just a fashion thing? Newman knew what he was doing. 1986
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ColorOfMoney_Rolex2.jpg (77.6 KB, 1632 views)
The Joker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 06:59 AM   #49
Denver Dick
"TRF" Member
 
Denver Dick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Wayne
Location: Ventura County CA
Watch: TT DateJust 16013
Posts: 428
I don't care for most Rolex TT watches. The exception is the DateJust. In fact, I love it so much that I still have (and love) my 1987 TT DJ 16013.

__________________
Rolex DateJust 16013
Omega Railmaster 2503.52


Denver Dick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 08:00 AM   #50
mrbill2mrbill2
"TRF" Member
 
mrbill2mrbill2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
For me TT doesn't work on the sports models.

__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13
mrbill2mrbill2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 08:09 AM   #51
OLJR
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Oliver
Location: Qatar
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 260
Is there any data to support this?
OLJR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 08:12 AM   #52
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,398
If you like them- go for it! For me- SS works! To each his own though.....
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 08:22 AM   #53
bkandj2000
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: B A
Location: Oklahoma
Watch: None specifically
Posts: 651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bananas View Post
TT is a dated 80's look, and you are just advertising the fact that you can't afford the full gold version.

And while I'm at it I think you can only pull off a full gold watch with gold bracelet if you are Tony Soprano or Elle Macpherson.

A gold watch with leather strap is hot though, not too over the top.

Stick with SS, it rules!


Quote:
Originally Posted by Bananas View Post
I don't think it says that at all. Time has shown that all things considered, SS is the best material for a watch. Look, durability. Obviously price is a factor, but regardless of this not everybody wants a gold watch.

I think gold only works in certain circumstances, SS always looks great.



The fashion police are on patrol again at TRF.
bkandj2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 08:33 AM   #54
The Joker
"TRF" Member
 
The Joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gotham
Posts: 9,634
Sorry, didn't mean to offend anyone
The Joker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 08:40 AM   #55
Rags
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,183
I think my TT datejust 16233 doesn't say old from the 80's. I think what it says is the man wearing this watch has extremely good taste in time pieces a very elegant watch..
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Snug & DJ 007.JPG (267.6 KB, 1569 views)
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust
16610 Z Serial Submariner
214270 Explorer

114300 Oyster Perpetual
76200 Tudor Date+Day
Rags is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 08:47 AM   #56
Kiddodoc
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kiddodoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: Texas
Watch: 15 and counting!
Posts: 3,476
TT do look good in certain models. DJ, Daytona to me look the best. I don't think they look 80's. Most like SS. Most of mine are SS but I do like a little bling here and there.
Kiddodoc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 08:49 AM   #57
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,758
I remember a chap in an office that I used to take supplies to who had a TT sub. He was a total arsehole! This topic reminded me of the conversation on watches I tried to have with him. He was just too up his own to be talking to a seamaster wearing peasant like me. I don't mind TT, though I'm probably soured to them by this isolated incident.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 08:52 AM   #58
hsfrank
"TRF" Member
 
hsfrank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Herbert Frank
Location: Middletown,De
Watch: President
Posts: 1,641
I have. No idea why they are unwanted. I think that the TT version of the sport watches such as the GMT and the Daytona are absolutely striking. The contrast in metals is what does it for me.
__________________

Time and Tide wait for no man

Rolex Cellini 4133
Tudor North Flag

HERS:
Rolex TTDJ
hsfrank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 08:54 AM   #59
BOA
"TRF" Member
 
BOA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Bruce
Location: Chicago, IL
Watch: Meteorite DD
Posts: 2,159
I don't think anyone's offended. I'm not, anyway. I usually wear my stainless watches, but I like gold on a strap, particularly the Breitling Chronomat 18k yellow gold on a black band. I have a white gold meteorite DD, which I love, and I'd never strap it. The bracelet is great, and it doesn't flash like yellow gold, so nobody's going to mistake me for Tony Soprano. It's very understated and elegant.

I hadn't realized that TT Rolexes were drugs on the market. Obviously, the prices need to come down until sales start to kick in. That's right. Come on down, prices. Keep coming. More, more. I mean less, less.

Then I'll buy that TT black submariner to go with my TT blue one. Oh yeah!!!
BOA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 08:57 AM   #60
Matchbox
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PA - USA
Posts: 100
2-tone

I think the 2-tone DJ with a jubilee band is a very pretty watch!

I much prefer it over most other watches.

I do have a SS model too, but it just doesn't have that same "sparkle"!!!

To each his own ... whatever floats your boat!!
Matchbox is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.