ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

SteelSubmarinerGuy · 23 July 2018, 11:13 PM

Sky Dweller or the GMT Master II?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Etschell · 23 July 2018, 11:14 PM

um gmt master no doubt.

skydwellers main function isnt the dual timezone. it is the annual calander.

toneafficianado · 23 July 2018, 11:17 PM

Better than both , legibility wise, is the Explorer II 42mm.

G'ed · 23 July 2018, 11:17 PM

Actually Sky D for me. Just look at the number pointed by the red triangle which is always at same position, at 12 o’clock. For GMT Master, you need to look for the GMT hand.

Opinion from owner of Sky D, GMT and Exp II

Cshull · 23 July 2018, 11:34 PM

I think the hand on the GMT master is harder to “pickup” at a glance than the dual time complication on the SkyDweller since it is always in the same location on the dial

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Floorguy · 23 July 2018, 11:41 PM

I think they’re all easy!

Duey · 24 July 2018, 12:06 AM

1) GMT BLRO - the red is the easiest
2) GMT LN - the green is easier to see then the light blue on the BLNR

ap1 · 24 July 2018, 12:11 AM

5164

WatchGuy1966 · 24 July 2018, 02:34 AM

I don't think my green GMT hand is easy to read at a glance. But I'm at that age where I need +1.0 reading glasses (in addition to my contacts) for a small-print cocktail menu at a fancy restaurant with dim lighting. Or "transition" bifocal glasses.

Hamstur · 24 July 2018, 02:40 AM

Out of curiosity, any specific scenario requiring very rapid dual time zone extrapolation? Asking because either option should become intrinsic with a little time, but any method will always take an extra moment to read.

23 July 2018, 11:13 PM	#1
SteelSubmarinerGuy "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Arkansas Posts: 508	Which is easier to read the GMT function on? Sky Dweller or the GMT Master II? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

23 July 2018, 11:14 PM	#2
Etschell "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: FL Watch: platinum sub Posts: 15,884	um gmt master no doubt. skydwellers main function isnt the dual timezone. it is the annual calander. __________________ If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4.

23 July 2018, 11:41 PM	#6
Floorguy 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Rob Location: Parrish fl. Watch: Tt datejust 16233 Posts: 20,947	I think they’re all easy! __________________ Rolex Omega Tag Heuer

23 July 2018, 11:17 PM	#3
toneafficianado 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Alan Location: Australia Posts: 2,201	Better than both , legibility wise, is the Explorer II 42mm.

23 July 2018, 11:17 PM	#4
G'ed "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2015 Location: RolexHQ boardroom Posts: 1,232	Actually Sky D for me. Just look at the number pointed by the red triangle which is always at same position, at 12 o’clock. For GMT Master, you need to look for the GMT hand. Opinion from owner of Sky D, GMT and Exp II

23 July 2018, 11:34 PM	#5
Cshull "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2016 Location: Idaho Posts: 132	I think the hand on the GMT master is harder to “pickup” at a glance than the dual time complication on the SkyDweller since it is always in the same location on the dial Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

24 July 2018, 12:06 AM	#7
Duey 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Duey Location: Maui Watch: Too Many To List Posts: 3,575	1) GMT BLRO - the red is the easiest 2) GMT LN - the green is easier to see then the light blue on the BLNR

24 July 2018, 12:11 AM	#8
ap1 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: usa Posts: 19,036	5164

24 July 2018, 02:34 AM	#9
WatchGuy1966 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2018 Location: Location Location Posts: 1,748	I don't think my green GMT hand is easy to read at a glance. But I'm at that age where I need +1.0 reading glasses (in addition to my contacts) for a small-print cocktail menu at a fancy restaurant with dim lighting. Or "transition" bifocal glasses.

24 July 2018, 02:40 AM	#10
Hamstur "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2017 Location: Arizona Posts: 114	Out of curiosity, any specific scenario requiring very rapid dual time zone extrapolation? Asking because either option should become intrinsic with a little time, but any method will always take an extra moment to read.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)