ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 July 2018, 10:48 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: At Sea
Posts: 394
|
Has the Tourbillon has its day?
With the advent of new materials and technical advances and in terms of accuracy (aesthetics aside), it would appear that it has. Here is a good read on the subject. What do you think?
|
27 July 2018, 11:08 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,861
|
its cool but it isnt for me at all. i appreciate the complexity and beauty of the design. i just dont ever consider myself one to shell out excess cash for it.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4. |
27 July 2018, 11:54 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: At Sea
Posts: 394
|
I’m in the same boat. While I appreciate the technical artistry and the aesthetic beauty of a high end tourbillon, for me accuracy and durability are paramount. But what I find most interesting about this article is the allegation that the tourbilliin, which was developed in the pursuit of accuracy, may no longer be relevant in that respect.
|
28 July 2018, 01:16 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: USA
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 73
|
I don't see the link.
But I think the tourbillon was never a useful feature on a wristwatch. The objective of it is to reduce the effects of gravity by rotating the escapement, and moving your arm has always done a pretty good job of that. I think they look really cool though. |
28 July 2018, 01:33 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 25,958
|
Cost and complexity to service does not appeal to me as well as the common presentation of a hole in the dial.
No thank you. Ps Is there supposed to be a link in your post? It’s not there.
__________________
|
28 July 2018, 08:28 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: At Sea
Posts: 394
|
Here is the link that I neglected to post above:
https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/do...n-a-wristwatch |
29 July 2018, 01:28 AM | #7 | |||
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,114
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The Tourbillon is in fact an additional mechanism that consumes energy without producing anything except misinformation.The energy it consumes is taken from the reserve destined to the regulator. As a result, the balance wheel with less energy will have reduced advantages.Now I agree totally the skill needed to make the cage plus the Tourbillon itself etc is a great horological skill.But in reality any Tourbillon watch is no more accurate that several other non Tourbillon watches that cost very very very much less.And even today's modern watches,with or without Tourbillons are not so accurate as one produced by John Harrison almost 300 years ago. Gravity is one of the main causes of rate variations in watches,by creating the Tourbillon,when Breguet thought he was eliminating its effects,It looks like it was an big error on his part,he only masked them like Tourbillons do.Now if someone could come up and counteract the effect on gravity on a wrist watch totally.Now that would be a big break through but until then Tourbillons,IMHO are just good to look at,and they are very very expensive to own,and they make them because they can.But again looking at the other side of the coin,in Breguets day a hundred plus years ago when he invented the Tourbillon and the tools he had then.And now today with modern machines and computers puts a different perspective on the making side of Tourbillons today.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
|||
29 July 2018, 04:21 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: At Sea
Posts: 394
|
Peter, thank you for your astute and informative reply.
Roger Smith pretty much sums it up. "I think George (Daniels) would have happily admitted that a tourbillon has no practical purpose within modern horology, and I would agree. The tourbillon was invented to cope with the vagaries of a split bimetallic balance, which due to its nature (two flexible arms) is impossible to poise, due to the varying temperatures, centrifugal forces and repeated shocks that a watch will receive. The tourbillon moderated these issues." "Today, the industry all use mono metallic balances which do not move once poised in the factory or workshop, and so for practical purposes relegates the tourbillon to the history books....” |
29 July 2018, 07:26 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,634
|
I don't think many would argue they serve a practical purpose for timekeeping these days, its about the artistry, complexity and rarefaction of owning one.
You will also notice many high end tourbillons are not visible from the dial side, rather a hidden gem for just the wearer to passively enjoy.
__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.” ― Winston S. Churchill |
29 July 2018, 05:39 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Uk
Watch: ALS 1815 up & down
Posts: 29
|
One could argue if the tourbillon has had it's day so has the mechanical wristwatch. But that's not the point.
|
29 July 2018, 10:43 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: At Sea
Posts: 394
|
|
31 July 2018, 12:26 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,861
|
__________________
If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4. |
31 July 2018, 01:58 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Michael
Location: Melbourne, Aust
Watch: Polar 16570
Posts: 1,166
|
If we're going to talk about usefulness and purpose, we may as well throw away all mech watches. They don't achieve what they were designed to with regards to accuracy any longer but when did needs come back into watchmaking?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
31 July 2018, 10:34 PM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: At Sea
Posts: 394
|
Quote:
Three of my Rolexs, two Subs and an Explorer II, have now been regulated by my AD to sub +1 sec/day. This more than meets my needs in terms of accuracy. |
|
1 August 2018, 04:19 AM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Juan Luis
Location: Dominican Rep.
Watch: Undecided
Posts: 1,319
|
Interesting thread. Thanks.
|
1 August 2018, 06:02 AM | #16 |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,444
|
It's a fun complication to look at, other than that, rather useless and overly expensive.
|
1 August 2018, 06:11 AM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,634
|
Quote:
Frivolous and knowingly expensive
__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.” ― Winston S. Churchill |
|
1 August 2018, 06:21 AM | #18 | |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,444
|
Quote:
As a watchmaker I can appreciate the fine details of the movement and definitely enjoy looking at them, but I do not have a desire to own one. Funny, I used to have a big list of all kinds of high end watches that I'd wish to own one day. Now having seen and briefly worn some of the world's most precious watches (RM, AP, Lange, PP, anything) I can only say my list is now pretty much empty. I definitely still enjoy getting my hands on this stuff, but that is enough. Saves me a lot of money |
|
1 August 2018, 07:23 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: At Sea
Posts: 394
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.