ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 February 2020, 02:36 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Nick
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: 1601
Posts: 10,477
|
I’m the only one? (Tudor GMT)
Sounds like you want a Rolex. Don’t compromise and get a Tudor despite it being a fantastic brand producing phenomenal watches considering the price point. You will be disappointed because it lacks the crown on the dial, not to mention the Mercedes hands.
No it’s not just you, as there are plenty of people who do not like the brand’s signature snowflake hand set. |
26 February 2020, 02:45 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: Frank
Location: Earth
Watch: Rolex 1665
Posts: 295
|
The Tudor is very nice, but it is also very thick - be aware and try one on. I had one and flipped it because it was too thick for me.
|
26 February 2020, 04:52 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Matt
Location: California
Posts: 162
|
Don't buy a Tudor because you can't get a Rolex. Only buy a Tudor if you like the Tudor.
|
26 February 2020, 06:13 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Canada
Watch: Sub, GMT
Posts: 712
|
I think the snowflake hands are my favourite part of the modern Tudor's. They're distinctive. That being said, I can understand why they're not to everyone's taste.
|
26 February 2020, 06:16 AM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 12,973
|
It's a fantastic watch, but if you are only buying it because you can't find a Rolex I would go a different direction. But a watch because you want it, not because you can't find what you are really looking for.
|
26 February 2020, 07:38 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,161
|
|
26 February 2020, 08:00 AM | #37 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Doug
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: Daytona BLNR SubLV
Posts: 2,253
|
Quote:
I agree, the handset on the Tudors are ugly. Why not check out Omega? To be honest, I would never take a Tudor over an Omega (and I’m a Rolex guy through and through). Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
26 February 2020, 10:32 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Location Location
Posts: 1,754
|
I think it's perfect if you are looking at the dial. but it's WAY too thick. Traded mine because of the thickness.
|
26 February 2020, 10:52 AM | #39 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 122
|
|
26 February 2020, 11:00 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 94
|
Bought the Tudor GMT. Traded it 7 months later for a 16710. Too thick and chunky for me.
__________________
Omega Railmaster 39mm Omega Speedmaster Professional Rolex Submariner 114060 Rolex GMT Master II 16710 |
26 February 2020, 11:33 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Japan
Posts: 238
|
LOL. You wanna buy apple or orange? Both are related but totally different.
|
26 February 2020, 02:47 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: US
Posts: 47
|
Yes, Tudor and Rolex share similarities but absolutely different.
|
26 February 2020, 04:01 PM | #43 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: AZ
Watch: a few
Posts: 1,068
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.