ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
31 August 2016, 08:23 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Jesse
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: TinTin!
Posts: 2,704
|
How badly priced is this 1680?
I know it's high at $12k USD asking price considering condition. How off the mark do you all think it is?
https://losangeles.craigslist.org/ws...750044460.html |
31 August 2016, 08:33 AM | #2 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,846
|
I think that watch has been discussed here before. I remember the finish loss at the bottom of the dial. Let me look for the thread...
Update, found the thread and its a different watch. Price seems high to me
__________________
TRF Member 11738 |
31 August 2016, 09:07 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Jesse
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: TinTin!
Posts: 2,704
|
I was told by another buddy of mine with much more knowledge about vintage rolexes that it was an $8k watch due to dial and bezel. Is he nuts?
|
31 August 2016, 10:29 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Jason
Location: Connecticut
Watch: Tudor 7016, 94010
Posts: 256
|
Yes, he's nuts. Sorta.The bezel looks fine to me with a great ghost insert, though it is a service one. Yes, the dial chipping is pretty crapping considering most of the value is in the dial. That being said, its still a genuine red and worth around $10k in my opinion.
|
31 August 2016, 10:50 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4
|
Just curious on what would fair price be for a
"Mint" red (original dial hands bezel etc) be? |
31 August 2016, 11:09 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Jason
Location: Connecticut
Watch: Tudor 7016, 94010
Posts: 256
|
|
31 August 2016, 11:53 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA Baby!
Posts: 1,068
|
8.5 to 9 at best. Dial is a killer.....i would pass. They say the condition of your first red is not important....the condition of your second red is. Save yourself the hassle. Get the right one first. Avoid this one. Shitty dial will grate one you.
|
31 August 2016, 01:07 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: YL
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 701
|
The defect of the dial is too obvious...
|
31 August 2016, 01:13 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA Baby!
Posts: 1,068
|
IMHO ff mark 4 or 5 dial:
Shitty red (hand, case, dial, insert issues) 7.5 - 9k Nice red (polished, orig hands, non orig insert) 9 to 11k Unmolested red 12 to 15k Nice red with papers and box 14.5 to 16k Nice red with papers, box, anchor, etc. 15 to 17k Unmolested red with full set 18 to 22k |
31 August 2016, 02:16 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Jesse
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: TinTin!
Posts: 2,704
|
you are correct. that dial would drive me nuts.
|
31 August 2016, 04:34 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 5,915
|
Hard Pass
|
1 September 2016, 02:37 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Western Europe
Posts: 609
|
|
1 September 2016, 06:29 AM | #13 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,791
|
Quote:
|
|
1 September 2016, 09:59 AM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,196
|
Here is a formula that might work for you in determining the value. Buy the watch at say...$12,000. Add a correct bezel insert...$1000...add a correct dial...$$6,000. Add $7,000 to the $12,000 purchase price and you have $19,000 in the watch to get it in decent condition. Value the take-out dial at $4,000, sell it, and you have $15000 in the watch. Now decide if it is worth $12,000 in its current condition. Nice Mark IV and Mark Vs sell for around $14,000 - predicated on the condition and originality.
The problem I see is that everyone and anyone spending five figures for a vintage Rolex Sub, GMT etc want one without issues if they are paying full, or close to, retail prices.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
1 September 2016, 03:05 PM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Jesse
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: TinTin!
Posts: 2,704
|
Quote:
|
|
1 September 2016, 03:13 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: IG @onthedial
Posts: 587
|
What John said (Spinger):
_____ IG: @onthedial |
1 September 2016, 04:52 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Mr. Hsu
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Datejust
Posts: 597
|
Meh
__________________
Good things come to those who wear Rolexes. |
1 September 2016, 10:22 PM | #18 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 911
|
As usual Springer is right on target.
|
1 September 2016, 11:23 PM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Ray
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,686
|
That's a fake dial and aftermarket hands
|
2 September 2016, 01:13 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Jesse
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: TinTin!
Posts: 2,704
|
|
2 September 2016, 06:53 AM | #21 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,196
|
I just spent some additional time studying this Craig's List 1680 and I think you might be correct about the dial. It might explain some of the poor quality photos.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
4 September 2016, 11:05 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Rome
Posts: 91
|
Sorry guys but I think the dial is false / repainted... value of zero .
This 1680 in my opinion has a few things right and it is in very poor condition |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.