ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Perdu · 2 September 2007, 08:17 AM

For 13 years I've worn a TT sub. Before that I had a GMT II. This week I added to my one watch collection with an Omega GMT. Only time will tell if it holds up, but here are my initial thoughts.

Sword hands and oversized number markers: As elegant as the mercedes hands are these are so incredibly visible and the lume on this face is the as good as it gets. I think Rolex are trying to improve on lowlight visibility with the new maxi dial. The markers are painted directly onto the face, but I don't mind that at, all as it suites the overall design very well. Personally, I like the more subtle GMT hand over the Rolex.

Dial: Semi gloss with a wave pattern. Not as nice as the Rolex deep gloss dial, but pleasant never-the-less.

Caliber: I hear very good things about the Omega 1120, but I'll be surprised if it matches the consistency of the 3135. In the three days I've had it, it has gained three seconds and then lost them again. So far, so good.

Bracelet: The "Speedy" bracelet is very solid. No hollow links and beautifully finished. I always wear my Rolex loose, but the Speedy is very comfortable to wear with no slack. While the speedy is probably a better bracelet and more comfortable, I prefer the classic look of the Oyster, rattles and all.

Bezel: The Rolex is the time honored classic. What can beat that, but the Omega is very positive and smooth - more like the new GMT.

I really like the Omega and think is a great compliment to my Sub.
So, here are my two watches.

Ed Rooney · 2 September 2007, 09:31 AM

I've been looking hard at the Omega GMT. I want a GMT watch, and I want a diver. I like a 60-minute bezel. The co-axial Seamaster (2535.80) with the Bond hands seems to fit the bill.

Tools · 2 September 2007, 10:30 AM

The Omega is a top quality watch..

They know the competition is Rolex and make their watches look and perform in a similar manner...

ROLEXAHOLIC · 2 September 2007, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tools

The Omega is a top quality watch..

They know the competition is Rolex and make their watches look and perform in a similar manner...

leopardprey · 3 September 2007, 12:21 AM

Well another thing you forgot to add about the Omega. It cost less than half of what Rolex cost!!!!!

I had an opportunity back in May, and I now regret it, to get a BNIB OMege White Dialed GMT for $1600 at an Omega AD in Cambodia!!! SHould have bought it. Had been in the store for 3 years already with no buyers. That is 1/3 the cost of an old style GMT II and only around 1/4 the cost of a new style GMT II !!!!!!!!!!

Jeelan · 4 September 2007, 12:42 PM

nt

Letsgodiving · 4 September 2007, 12:48 PM

Pics aren't showing up for me.

daunwaun · 4 September 2007, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tools

The Omega is a top quality watch..

They know the competition is Rolex and make their watches look and perform in a similar manner...

UHHH i dun think so!!!

roadcarver · 4 September 2007, 02:59 PM

Omegas are quality time pieces... the only thing holding them back is their advertising dept

Quote:

Originally Posted by daunwaun

UHHH i dun think so!!!

JJ Irani · 4 September 2007, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Letsgodiving

Pics aren't showing up for me.

Agreed....only tiny red crosses for me!!

daunwaun · 4 September 2007, 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roadcarver

Omegas are quality time pieces... the only thing holding them back is their advertising dept

i dont think they are on the same level

puffnmo · 5 September 2007, 01:02 AM

Not getting pix either...

Agreed, the Omegas are not quite up to the Rolex standard, but they can happily co-exist side by side in a good collection.
I love my PO's, even wear my small ss early 70's Constellation... Larry.

daunwaun · 5 September 2007, 11:18 AM

i guess...they can co-exist

roadcarver · 5 September 2007, 02:26 PM

Sure they can LOL! The photo evidence shows it!

Quote:

Originally Posted by daunwaun

i guess...they can co-exist

Perdu · 6 September 2007, 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Agreed....only tiny red crosses for me!!

OK, let me try again. . .

1995 Rolie

2007 Omega

2 September 2007, 08:17 AM	#1
Perdu "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Gary Location: GMT-6 Watch: GMT Posts: 3,350	Omega gmt and Rolex Sub. For 13 years I've worn a TT sub. Before that I had a GMT II. This week I added to my one watch collection with an Omega GMT. Only time will tell if it holds up, but here are my initial thoughts. Sword hands and oversized number markers: As elegant as the mercedes hands are these are so incredibly visible and the lume on this face is the as good as it gets. I think Rolex are trying to improve on lowlight visibility with the new maxi dial. The markers are painted directly onto the face, but I don't mind that at, all as it suites the overall design very well. Personally, I like the more subtle GMT hand over the Rolex. Dial: Semi gloss with a wave pattern. Not as nice as the Rolex deep gloss dial, but pleasant never-the-less. Caliber: I hear very good things about the Omega 1120, but I'll be surprised if it matches the consistency of the 3135. In the three days I've had it, it has gained three seconds and then lost them again. So far, so good. Bracelet: The "Speedy" bracelet is very solid. No hollow links and beautifully finished. I always wear my Rolex loose, but the Speedy is very comfortable to wear with no slack. While the speedy is probably a better bracelet and more comfortable, I prefer the classic look of the Oyster, rattles and all. Bezel: The Rolex is the time honored classic. What can beat that, but the Omega is very positive and smooth - more like the new GMT. I really like the Omega and think is a great compliment to my Sub. So, here are my two watches. __________________ Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter

4 September 2007, 12:42 PM	#6
Jeelan "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Perth, West Aus Posts: 60	i'm holding out in the hope they'll bring out a PO based GMT [nt] nt

5 September 2007, 11:18 AM	#13
daunwaun "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Ken Location: toronto Watch: 18K YG Day Date Posts: 2,985	i guess...they can co-exist __________________ DAUNWAUN

2 September 2007, 09:31 AM	#2
Ed Rooney "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Annapolis, MD Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600 Posts: 5,081	I've been looking hard at the Omega GMT. I want a GMT watch, and I want a diver. I like a 60-minute bezel. The co-axial Seamaster (2535.80) with the Bond hands seems to fit the bill.

2 September 2007, 10:30 AM	#3
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,080	The Omega is a top quality watch.. They know the competition is Rolex and make their watches look and perform in a similar manner...

3 September 2007, 12:21 AM	#5
leopardprey Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Chad Location: Around the world Watch: Panerai 233 Posts: 4,204	Well another thing you forgot to add about the Omega. It cost less than half of what Rolex cost!!!!! I had an opportunity back in May, and I now regret it, to get a BNIB OMege White Dialed GMT for $1600 at an Omega AD in Cambodia!!! SHould have bought it. Had been in the store for 3 years already with no buyers. That is 1/3 the cost of an old style GMT II and only around 1/4 the cost of a new style GMT II !!!!!!!!!!

4 September 2007, 12:48 PM	#7
Letsgodiving "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Mike Location: Virginia, US Watch: SD 16600 Posts: 4,310	Pics aren't showing up for me.

5 September 2007, 01:02 AM	#12
puffnmo Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 848	Not getting pix either... Agreed, the Omegas are not quite up to the Rolex standard, but they can happily co-exist side by side in a good collection. I love my PO's, even wear my small ss early 70's Constellation... Larry.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)