ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 February 2021, 08:06 AM | #31 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,616
|
As I said in my former post to the thread taken down, there are federal crimes going on here not just civil.
|
14 February 2021, 10:17 AM | #32 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
|
Quote:
|
|
14 February 2021, 10:31 AM | #33 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,725
|
Quote:
They already outproduce all other Swiss mfr.’s and hasn’t hurt the GPM methinks. But I agree they won’t quadruple production of sports models. That’s what it would take to bring fulfillment of demand to equilibrium. I think they struggle with supply chain and distribution on top of demand issues. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
|
14 February 2021, 10:53 AM | #34 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,725
|
Yes the complaint included allegations that similar activity extended to PP models. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
14 February 2021, 11:08 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Chicago
Posts: 170
|
This is really disheartening to read on many levels.
I know that the Rolex wait list issue has been beaten to death from every angle, but as a faithful AD customer who has attempted to politely and patiently navigate the Rolex AD maze - establish a buying history - establish relationships, etc - it's pretty disgusting to read that much of the fuss and waiting is likely due to blatant AD corruption and disregard for honest retail customers. And now, at least in this particular instance, the retail customers waiting for hard-to-get models have to ostensibly start from zero with other ADs (assuming CDP will lose their Rolex account regardless of the ultimate success of the lawsuit...). I wish I didn't want another Rolex... |
14 February 2021, 01:11 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 668
|
Next time they should get a proof reader... nor may they pay a feel for any referrals.
RETAIL SALES ONLY. Jewelers will sell Rolex products only to ultimate consumers, at the retail level, in transactions that originate over-the-counter at its authorized location(s). All other methods of the sale (except for Rolex-approved corporate/presentation sales) are considered transshipping. Rolex is the sole distributor of Rolex watches in the United States. Rolex has not authorized any ORJ or any other person to act as a wholesaler or subdistributor; therefore, any transshipment of Rolex watches, even if unintentional, is prohibited. ORJs may not sell watches to customers referred from outside their local market area (unless the sale is transacted in person at an authorized location), nor may they pay a feel for any referrals. |
14 February 2021, 01:21 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 668
|
Next time they should get a proof reader... nor may they pay a feel for any referrals.
RETAIL SALES ONLY. Jewelers will sell Rolex products only to ultimate consumers, at the retail level, in transactions that originate over-the-counter at its authorized location(s). All other methods of the sale (except for Rolex-approved corporate/presentation sales) are considered transshipping. Rolex is the sole distributor of Rolex watches in the United States. Rolex has not authorized any ORJ or any other person to act as a wholesaler or subdistributor; therefore, any transshipment of Rolex watches, even if unintentional, is prohibited. ORJs may not sell watches to customers referred from outside their local market area (unless the sale is transacted in person at an authorized location), nor may they pay a feel for any referrals. Last edited by T4ME; 14 February 2021 at 02:25 PM.. Reason: double post |
15 February 2021, 12:07 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,661
|
|
15 February 2021, 02:22 AM | #39 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
|
Well, what is claimed, is that the Chinese National, who was in the country on a student visa, but who is not enrolled in any form of education, was working for the store and selling the new pieces to China, which was paying a premium for them. I don’t know immigration laws enough to know if that is a federal or criminal offense, but if true, immigration would surely be interested.
|
15 February 2021, 03:14 AM | #40 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,661
|
Quote:
|
|
15 February 2021, 04:21 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Roy
Location: Ft.Lauderdale
Watch: 116520 (-;
Posts: 11
|
Rolex Dealer Whistleblowers lawsuit
Thank you for reposting this link. Goes without saying that the majority of those who are multiple Rolex buyers know this goes on, but this business goes on unabated because Rolex despite their conditions of sale are fully aware "that business is business" and actually benefit from the increased prices that Grey market dealers command for SOME of their models.
I am fortunate to own more than one Rolex in my collection and presently have my name on three separate ADs list for over six months for a 62510BLRO which is fetching over $19,000.00 grey market in these troubled times. Bearing in mind the official dealers that sold this model already made their profit plus whatever "bonus" they negotiated. So us "schleps" as one prominent dealer once named us just have to sit and wait .....complain as much as you like, it ain't gonna change! |
16 February 2021, 01:33 AM | #43 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Wild Wild West
Watch: Watching
Posts: 1,755
|
Quote:
Tax evasion will end up being the critical point, but a retailer exporting illegally won't be a small issue in this. My gut tells me, though, that the AD has clean hands relating to shipping and all the hand greasing was cash and anonymous.
__________________
Two Factor Authentication Enabled On My Account. |
|
16 February 2021, 02:07 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Phillip
Location: Right here
Watch: SD43 Daytona Blusy
Posts: 1,797
|
I actually surprised that many here are surprised this is going on at this AD. Guaranteed this is not the only AD with these practices with the caveat that they may be selling to in country grey dealers.
Imagine you own an AD. You are requested by Rolex to have certain standards and parameters to have this privledge, but you have little to no inventory to sell. Your rent is the same but display cases are always empty. You can either sell to regular customer and make $2400 per $13k watch or $2400+ to a grey. |
16 February 2021, 02:17 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4
|
Crazy to hear about this happening right in my backyard. Always felt the Old Orchard CDP had something shady going on
|
16 February 2021, 02:18 AM | #46 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Chicago
Posts: 170
|
Quote:
|
|
16 February 2021, 04:25 AM | #47 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,725
|
Quote:
What did you see in the complaint that proved the AD did not book the sales at MSRP and then did not pay the local and state sales taxes? I get that the “middle trader” accepted funds in excess of MSRP from the grey dealers. The AD likely accounted for their inbound inventory from RUSA, and later disposition to keep accounts balanced. If the Shipper's Export Declaration is completed electronically, and declared as a Swiss watch at MSRP value, then no US Customs violation. Likely they had the requisite licenses for other aboveboard transactions. It’s a set of shady dealings for sure. But can’t find the “illegal” part without more evidence. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
|
16 February 2021, 05:28 AM | #48 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
|
You know, I honestly don’t have a clue if there will be criminal proceedings or conviction, but I am VERY glad to see this news. As a regular and poor schlep that loves Rolex, and would love the ABILITY to be able to walk in to an AD and purchase one at MSRP, I have hopes from this lawsuit. I HOPE, that it will bring this practice to light, HOPE that it will curtail this practice and make more models available at the AD.
I am not Naive, I don’t believe this is the cure all, and that next week display cases will be over-flowing, but hope this will maybe begin the process of improving the situation. What was that quote from Shawshank Redemption? “Hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things, and no good thing ever dies” |
16 February 2021, 05:29 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Odorious Onion
Watch: yes, it's hipster
Posts: 1,568
|
No thanks. I'm happy knowing my watch retains most of its value (and then some).
__________________
Here come dat boi Jerry |
16 February 2021, 06:04 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,661
|
So, let me see if I have this right -- there has been tax fraud and RICO!, CDP blatantly cheating on their agreement with Rolex and the only place any of this is brought up is in a civil complaint by a former employee trying to claim whistle blower status?
CDP is still an AD for Rolex correct? Odd given the "facts" alleged. Neither the US attorney nor any authority that actually has jurisdiction over this matter has not done anything to our knowledge? Again, odd given the "facts" alleged. Or maybe the former employee didn't contact Rolex, or the state of Illinois or anyone else before filing the suit? Again, seems like a stretch since most "whistleblowers" have specific remedies to them at the state level of which they can avail themselves for free without having to hire a lawyer (although odds are this is a contingency case, because again, RICO!). So Rolex, the federal authorities and everyone else that actually has the power to do something about this conduct has done nothing because either (1) maybe, just possibly, the facts are not quite what is being alleged, (2) this is the first time these allegations have been aired and only now will the authorities and Rolex get involved or (3) there is some conspiracy and the only truth teller in this entire tale is the former employee that just so happens to get treble damages if successful for using the magic RICO word. Anyone who has the first bit of experience in these matters sees the RICO allegation for what it is -- a settlement shakedown. There is zero chance this goes anywhere on RICO. None. When you see RICO in a complaint you know the plaintiff has got nothing. I appreciate people want this to be illegal, but the reality is if this is anything its a dispute between Rolex and the AD, and so far anyway Rolex is sticking with the AD. |
16 February 2021, 06:08 AM | #51 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Tokyo
Watch: SD43,PAM1616,Hulk
Posts: 3,567
|
Quote:
|
|
16 February 2021, 06:43 AM | #52 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,863
|
Quote:
Is it maybe that Rolex ultimately doesn't care as long as they sell the watches? |
|
16 February 2021, 06:45 AM | #53 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: USA
Watch: 5 digit models
Posts: 1,515
|
Some consolidation of links.
Overall summary of Chicago AD: https://atelierdegriff.com/2021/02/1...o-grey-market/ submitted Complaint https://www.scribd.com/document_down...wrUBWs4TWvQhsI |
16 February 2021, 07:02 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Ilinois, USA
Posts: 75
|
Interesting read! I hope Rolex steps in and removes their AD status.
I’ve been into that store a few times and the SA’s always had a weird/snobby vibe. During one of the visits, the SA implied that the watch I was wearing was fake, lol. not getting any business from me. |
16 February 2021, 07:05 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Seattle
Watch: 16613 / 126600
Posts: 446
|
C.D Peacock Lawsuit: Used to be my AD...
I have bought a watch from CD Peacock (Northbrook, IL) awhile back, a two-tone Rolex sub... Like most ADs, stainless steel sports model were a "rare" commodity and extremely hard to buy in this AD.
Now, I know with certainty... https://atelierdegriff.com/2021/02/1...o-grey-market/ |
16 February 2021, 07:11 AM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: London UK
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 58
|
Interesting - could go either way this one
|
16 February 2021, 07:17 AM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Ilinois, USA
Posts: 75
|
“rare”............. to be sold at MSRP to customers
|
16 February 2021, 07:22 AM | #58 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 24,603
|
Think saw another thread today on the same subject
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 2230.50.00 Zenith 02.470.405 Henry Archer Eclipse 2FA security enabled |
16 February 2021, 07:50 AM | #59 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,725
|
Several parallel threads on this.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
16 February 2021, 08:04 AM | #60 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,256
|
Interesting article; not only does it apply to the sellers but to the buyers as well imho!! I wonder how many Greys are involved in this sort of illegal activity?
|
Tags |
cd peacock , illinois , lawsuit , patek phillippe , rolex |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.