The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 February 2021, 08:06 AM   #31
BillA
2024 Pledge Member
 
BillA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,616
As I said in my former post to the thread taken down, there are federal crimes going on here not just civil.
BillA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 10:17 AM   #32
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromosome View Post
Rolex is a joke at this point. Why don't they just up production and release more watches into circulation? This will kill the flippers. The 'grey market value' of Rolex watches will decrease but so what? I believe luxury watches should depreciate and people who can't afford to take the hit can't afford to own them! The real ballers can afford to lose the money
That would devalue the brand. I’d guess if anything they are going to cut production and go further up market to weather the iwatch like they did with quartz.
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 10:31 AM   #33
77T
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,725
Quote:
Originally Posted by breitlings View Post
That would devalue the brand. I’d guess if anything they are going to cut production and go further up market to weather the iwatch like they did with quartz.

They already outproduce all other Swiss mfr.’s and hasn’t hurt the GPM methinks.

But I agree they won’t quadruple production of sports models. That’s what it would take to bring fulfillment of demand to equilibrium.

I think they struggle with supply chain and distribution on top of demand issues.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 10:53 AM   #34
77T
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,725
Quote:
Originally Posted by CFR View Post
I also wonder if anything went on with their Patek pieces.


Yes the complaint included allegations that similar activity extended to PP models.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 11:08 AM   #35
Alex369
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Chicago
Posts: 170
This is really disheartening to read on many levels.

I know that the Rolex wait list issue has been beaten to death from every angle, but as a faithful AD customer who has attempted to politely and patiently navigate the Rolex AD maze - establish a buying history - establish relationships, etc - it's pretty disgusting to read that much of the fuss and waiting is likely due to blatant AD corruption and disregard for honest retail customers. And now, at least in this particular instance, the retail customers waiting for hard-to-get models have to ostensibly start from zero with other ADs (assuming CDP will lose their Rolex account regardless of the ultimate success of the lawsuit...).

I wish I didn't want another Rolex...
Alex369 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 01:11 PM   #36
T4ME
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 668
Next time they should get a proof reader... nor may they pay a feel for any referrals.


RETAIL SALES ONLY. Jewelers will sell Rolex products only to
ultimate consumers, at the retail level, in transactions that
originate over-the-counter at its authorized location(s). All
other methods of the sale (except for Rolex-approved
corporate/presentation sales) are considered transshipping. Rolex
is the sole distributor of Rolex watches in the United States.
Rolex has not authorized any ORJ or any other person to act as a
wholesaler or subdistributor; therefore, any transshipment of
Rolex watches, even if unintentional, is prohibited. ORJs may not
sell watches to customers referred from outside their local
market area (unless the sale is transacted in person at an
authorized location), nor may they pay a feel for any referrals.
T4ME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2021, 01:21 PM   #37
T4ME
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 668
Icon13

Next time they should get a proof reader... nor may they pay a feel for any referrals.


RETAIL SALES ONLY. Jewelers will sell Rolex products only to
ultimate consumers, at the retail level, in transactions that
originate over-the-counter at its authorized location(s). All
other methods of the sale (except for Rolex-approved
corporate/presentation sales) are considered transshipping. Rolex
is the sole distributor of Rolex watches in the United States.
Rolex has not authorized any ORJ or any other person to act as a
wholesaler or subdistributor; therefore, any transshipment of
Rolex watches, even if unintentional, is prohibited. ORJs may not
sell watches to customers referred from outside their local
market area (unless the sale is transacted in person at an
authorized location), nor may they pay a feel for any referrals.

Last edited by T4ME; 14 February 2021 at 02:25 PM.. Reason: double post
T4ME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2021, 12:07 AM   #38
SMD
"TRF" Member
 
SMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,661
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillA View Post
As I said in my former post to the thread taken down, there are federal crimes going on here not just civil.
And if there are, which no one can tell from a complaint, this lawsuit has nothing to do with those alleged crimes.
SMD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2021, 02:22 AM   #39
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMD View Post
And if there are, which no one can tell from a complaint, this lawsuit has nothing to do with those alleged crimes.
Well, what is claimed, is that the Chinese National, who was in the country on a student visa, but who is not enrolled in any form of education, was working for the store and selling the new pieces to China, which was paying a premium for them. I don’t know immigration laws enough to know if that is a federal or criminal offense, but if true, immigration would surely be interested.
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2021, 03:14 AM   #40
SMD
"TRF" Member
 
SMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,661
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
Well, what is claimed, is that the Chinese National, who was in the country on a student visa, but who is not enrolled in any form of education, was working for the store and selling the new pieces to China, which was paying a premium for them. I don’t know immigration laws enough to know if that is a federal or criminal offense, but if true, immigration would surely be interested.
Deleting.
SMD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2021, 04:21 AM   #41
Themarinesurveyor
"TRF" Member
 
Themarinesurveyor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Roy
Location: Ft.Lauderdale
Watch: 116520 (-;
Posts: 11
Rolex Dealer Whistleblowers lawsuit

Thank you for reposting this link. Goes without saying that the majority of those who are multiple Rolex buyers know this goes on, but this business goes on unabated because Rolex despite their conditions of sale are fully aware "that business is business" and actually benefit from the increased prices that Grey market dealers command for SOME of their models.
I am fortunate to own more than one Rolex in my collection and presently have my name on three separate ADs list for over six months for a 62510BLRO which is fetching over $19,000.00 grey market in these troubled times. Bearing in mind the official dealers that sold this model already made their profit plus whatever "bonus" they negotiated. So us "schleps" as one prominent dealer once named us just have to sit and wait .....complain as much as you like, it ain't gonna change!
Themarinesurveyor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 12:47 AM   #42
LouG
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The Great Midwest
Posts: 48
Any thoughts on where this may go now that it's made the YouTube community.....?
LouG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 01:33 AM   #43
Cloudchaser
"TRF" Member
 
Cloudchaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Wild Wild West
Watch: Watching
Posts: 1,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMD View Post
The gist is that the dealer allegedly violated their agreement with Rolex (a commercial dispute) and therefore Rico? How could this be criminal? This is a reminder that it is way too easy to get into law school. Lawsuit is going nowhere.
Two things. First, tax evasion charges will be a big part of this. Second, if they shipped internationally on any of this, their duty forms have issues...guaranteed.

Tax evasion will end up being the critical point, but a retailer exporting illegally won't be a small issue in this.

My gut tells me, though, that the AD has clean hands relating to shipping and all the hand greasing was cash and anonymous.
__________________
Two Factor Authentication Enabled On My Account.
Cloudchaser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 02:07 AM   #44
SDGT3
"TRF" Member
 
SDGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Phillip
Location: Right here
Watch: SD43 Daytona Blusy
Posts: 1,797
I actually surprised that many here are surprised this is going on at this AD. Guaranteed this is not the only AD with these practices with the caveat that they may be selling to in country grey dealers.

Imagine you own an AD. You are requested by Rolex to have certain standards and parameters to have this privledge, but you have little to no inventory to sell. Your rent is the same but display cases are always empty. You can either sell to regular customer and make $2400 per $13k watch or $2400+ to a grey.
SDGT3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 02:17 AM   #45
Joshua_J0
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4
Crazy to hear about this happening right in my backyard. Always felt the Old Orchard CDP had something shady going on
Joshua_J0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 02:18 AM   #46
Alex369
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Chicago
Posts: 170
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloudchaser View Post
Two things. First, tax evasion charges will be a big part of this. Second, if they shipped internationally on any of this, their duty forms have issues...guaranteed.

Tax evasion will end up being the critical point, but a retailer exporting illegally won't be a small issue in this.

My gut tells me, though, that the AD has clean hands relating to shipping and all the hand greasing was cash and anonymous.
But doesn't the complaint specifically allege that a large number of the purchases were made by a SA, with her own personal credit card? I mean, the scheme "profits" might have been divvied up in cash, but the purchases were still illegal and traceable, right?
Alex369 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 04:25 AM   #47
77T
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,725
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloudchaser View Post
Two things. First, tax evasion charges will be a big part of this. Second, if they shipped internationally on any of this, their duty forms have issues...guaranteed.



Tax evasion will end up being the critical point, but a retailer exporting illegally won't be a small issue in this.



What did you see in the complaint that proved the AD did not book the sales at MSRP and then did not pay the local and state sales taxes? I get that the “middle trader” accepted funds in excess of MSRP from the grey dealers. The AD likely accounted for their inbound inventory from RUSA, and later disposition to keep accounts balanced.

If the Shipper's Export Declaration is completed electronically, and declared as a Swiss watch at MSRP value, then no US Customs violation. Likely they had the requisite licenses for other aboveboard transactions.

It’s a set of shady dealings for sure. But can’t find the “illegal” part without more evidence.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 05:28 AM   #48
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
You know, I honestly don’t have a clue if there will be criminal proceedings or conviction, but I am VERY glad to see this news. As a regular and poor schlep that loves Rolex, and would love the ABILITY to be able to walk in to an AD and purchase one at MSRP, I have hopes from this lawsuit. I HOPE, that it will bring this practice to light, HOPE that it will curtail this practice and make more models available at the AD.

I am not Naive, I don’t believe this is the cure all, and that next week display cases will be over-flowing, but hope this will maybe begin the process of improving the situation.

What was that quote from Shawshank Redemption?

“Hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things, and no good thing ever dies”
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 05:29 AM   #49
daOnlyBG
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Odorious Onion
Watch: yes, it's hipster
Posts: 1,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromosome View Post
Why don't they just up production and release more watches into circulation? This will kill the flippers. The 'grey market value' of Rolex watches will decrease but so what?
No thanks. I'm happy knowing my watch retains most of its value (and then some).
__________________
Here come dat boi Jerry
daOnlyBG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 06:04 AM   #50
SMD
"TRF" Member
 
SMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,661
So, let me see if I have this right -- there has been tax fraud and RICO!, CDP blatantly cheating on their agreement with Rolex and the only place any of this is brought up is in a civil complaint by a former employee trying to claim whistle blower status?

CDP is still an AD for Rolex correct? Odd given the "facts" alleged.

Neither the US attorney nor any authority that actually has jurisdiction over this matter has not done anything to our knowledge? Again, odd given the "facts" alleged.

Or maybe the former employee didn't contact Rolex, or the state of Illinois or anyone else before filing the suit? Again, seems like a stretch since most "whistleblowers" have specific remedies to them at the state level of which they can avail themselves for free without having to hire a lawyer (although odds are this is a contingency case, because again, RICO!).

So Rolex, the federal authorities and everyone else that actually has the power to do something about this conduct has done nothing because either (1) maybe, just possibly, the facts are not quite what is being alleged, (2) this is the first time these allegations have been aired and only now will the authorities and Rolex get involved or (3) there is some conspiracy and the only truth teller in this entire tale is the former employee that just so happens to get treble damages if successful for using the magic RICO word.

Anyone who has the first bit of experience in these matters sees the RICO allegation for what it is -- a settlement shakedown. There is zero chance this goes anywhere on RICO. None. When you see RICO in a complaint you know the plaintiff has got nothing.

I appreciate people want this to be illegal, but the reality is if this is anything its a dispute between Rolex and the AD, and so far anyway Rolex is sticking with the AD.
SMD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 06:08 AM   #51
rambo99
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Tokyo
Watch: SD43,PAM1616,Hulk
Posts: 3,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromosome View Post
Rolex is a joke at this point. Why don't they just up production and release more watches into circulation? This will kill the flippers. The 'grey market value' of Rolex watches will decrease but so what? I believe luxury watches should depreciate and people who can't afford to take the hit can't afford to own them! The real ballers can afford to lose the money
it would be much easier for rolex to double up the msrp of all sought after models. grey dealers will be in big trouble.
rambo99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 06:43 AM   #52
dauster
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,863
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMD View Post
So, let me see if I have this right -- there has been tax fraud and RICO!, CDP blatantly cheating on their agreement with Rolex and the only place any of this is brought up is in a civil complaint by a former employee trying to claim whistle blower status?

CDP is still an AD for Rolex correct? Odd given the "facts" alleged.

Neither the US attorney nor any authority that actually has jurisdiction over this matter has not done anything to our knowledge? Again, odd given the "facts" alleged.

Or maybe the former employee didn't contact Rolex, or the state of Illinois or anyone else before filing the suit? Again, seems like a stretch since most "whistleblowers" have specific remedies to them at the state level of which they can avail themselves for free without having to hire a lawyer (although odds are this is a contingency case, because again, RICO!).

So Rolex, the federal authorities and everyone else that actually has the power to do something about this conduct has done nothing because either (1) maybe, just possibly, the facts are not quite what is being alleged, (2) this is the first time these allegations have been aired and only now will the authorities and Rolex get involved or (3) there is some conspiracy and the only truth teller in this entire tale is the former employee that just so happens to get treble damages if successful for using the magic RICO word.

Anyone who has the first bit of experience in these matters sees the RICO allegation for what it is -- a settlement shakedown. There is zero chance this goes anywhere on RICO. None. When you see RICO in a complaint you know the plaintiff has got nothing.

I appreciate people want this to be illegal, but the reality is if this is anything its a dispute between Rolex and the AD, and so far anyway Rolex is sticking with the AD.
thank you for this, makes a lot of sense.

Is it maybe that Rolex ultimately doesn't care as long as they sell the watches?
dauster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 06:45 AM   #53
jaisonline
2024 Pledge Member
 
jaisonline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: USA
Watch: 5 digit models
Posts: 1,515
Some consolidation of links.

Overall summary of Chicago AD:

https://atelierdegriff.com/2021/02/1...o-grey-market/

submitted Complaint

https://www.scribd.com/document_down...wrUBWs4TWvQhsI
jaisonline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 07:02 AM   #54
BS26809
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Ilinois, USA
Posts: 75
Interesting read! I hope Rolex steps in and removes their AD status.

I’ve been into that store a few times and the SA’s always had a weird/snobby vibe. During one of the visits, the SA implied that the watch I was wearing was fake, lol. not getting any business from me.
BS26809 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 07:05 AM   #55
JePro
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Seattle
Watch: 16613 / 126600
Posts: 446
C.D Peacock Lawsuit: Used to be my AD...

I have bought a watch from CD Peacock (Northbrook, IL) awhile back, a two-tone Rolex sub... Like most ADs, stainless steel sports model were a "rare" commodity and extremely hard to buy in this AD.

Now, I know with certainty...

https://atelierdegriff.com/2021/02/1...o-grey-market/
JePro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 07:11 AM   #56
cocoabutter
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: London UK
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 58
Interesting - could go either way this one
cocoabutter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 07:17 AM   #57
BS26809
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Ilinois, USA
Posts: 75
“rare”............. to be sold at MSRP to customers
BS26809 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 07:22 AM   #58
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 24,603
Think saw another thread today on the same subject


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 2230.50.00
Zenith 02.470.405
Henry Archer Eclipse

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 07:50 AM   #59
77T
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,725
Several parallel threads on this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2021, 08:04 AM   #60
HogwldFLTR
2024 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,256
Interesting article; not only does it apply to the sellers but to the buyers as well imho!! I wonder how many Greys are involved in this sort of illegal activity?
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
cd peacock , illinois , lawsuit , patek phillippe , rolex


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.