The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 20 July 2020, 09:43 AM   #31
305watchcollector
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 79
Nice
305watchcollector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2020, 11:22 AM   #32
sgwatchguy
"TRF" Member
 
sgwatchguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Real Name: KP Jimmy
Location: Singapore
Watch: R/AP/FPJ/Hermès/et
Posts: 6,597
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xeer View Post
They don't have to promote it because they dont make the 15300 anymore!

:) I think the underlying point was on it being a good picture
__________________
sgwatchguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 July 2020, 12:42 AM   #33
amateurcollector
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: US
Posts: 87
Can someone explain to me why 15300 prices keep going up on the secondary markets? Surprised they are going in the mid $20's these days.
amateurcollector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 July 2020, 12:50 AM   #34
J to the Z
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex, AP
Posts: 237
Quote:
Originally Posted by amateurcollector View Post
Can someone explain to me why 15300 prices keep going up on the secondary markets? Surprised they are going in the mid $20's these days.

The 15202 keeps proving to be extremely difficult to get at retail for many and the 15300 is one of the only 39mm royal oaks ever made so naturally it’s a very comparable watch. The 39mm size seems to be the consensus “perfect size” for small and large wrists alike. The 15300 also had a relatively short production run so there are a fairly small number of them in existence. This combination of factors is basically the “perfect storm” for the 15300’s recent popularity.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
J to the Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 July 2020, 10:41 AM   #35
amateurcollector
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: US
Posts: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by J to the Z View Post
The 15202 keeps proving to be extremely difficult to get at retail for many and the 15300 is one of the only 39mm royal oaks ever made so naturally it’s a very comparable watch. The 39mm size seems to be the consensus “perfect size” for small and large wrists alike. The 15300 also had a relatively short production run so there are a fairly small number of them in existence. This combination of factors is basically the “perfect storm” for the 15300’s recent popularity.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That makes sense - thanks!
amateurcollector is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.