Ap 15450

[XOREL]

Hi guys

Has anybody a size comparison between a an AP 15450 and for example a Rolex Submariner or GMT etc.
thx

[ChipWong]

Its slightly smaller than a preceramic sub but substantially larger than a dj 36

[MichelleP]

I have all 3 and it wears smaller than the Sub and GMT but a perfect fit for my 6.5" wrist.

[XOREL]

Thx. Do you have any pictures?

[nsguy]

I have a 15450, 14060 (pre-ceramic submariner) and a 116610ln (ceramic submariner date). I can take more photos tomorrow, but for now, you can see how they all compare here. To me, the 15450 and 14060 fit the same

[huncho]

here it is with a daytona and a dd36

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=585678

[rohk]

Originally Posted by huncho

here it is with a daytona and a dd36

Thanks for the thread with all the pictures and information!

[Jsol]

AP 15450st and GMT 1675

[XOREL]

Thank you Jsol.
Very nice!
But the AP does not look smaller.
Whatwould you say?

[myusernamez]

I don't understand how it looks so big on these pictures. When I tried it on it was way smaller than the GMT Master 2, way way smaller.

[Laglag]

Originally Posted by myusernamez

I don't understand how it looks so big on these pictures. When I tried it on it was way smaller than the GMT Master 2, way way smaller.

Same for me!

[tonupbklyn]

u tried on gmtii in current supercase form or prior gen?
it's definitely larger if supercase, but not markedly different than prior gen, imho.

[myusernamez]

Originally Posted by tonupbklyn

u tried on gmtii in current supercase form or prior gen?
it's definitely larger if supercase, but not markedly different than prior gen, imho.

2017 model so current supercase.

[soran]

I was in the market for a 15450 but decided to pass as I found it wore small compared to for example my 116520.

[Jsol]

Originally Posted by myusernamez

I don't understand how it looks so big on these pictures. When I tried it on it was way smaller than the GMT Master 2, way way smaller.

The newer GMTS have the maxi case so they are a bit bigger than my Pepsi 1675.

[dxbtousa]

Originally Posted by nsguy

I have a 15450, 14060 (pre-ceramic submariner) and a 116610ln (ceramic submariner date). I can take more photos tomorrow, but for now, you can see how they all compare here. To me, the 15450 and 14060 fit the same

What watch box is that mate?

[cloudplay]

Originally Posted by Laglag

Same for me!

Same here. I've gone through the same cycle a few times now - saw pictures where the size looks just fine compared to Daytona etc, went to try one at AP AD/boutique, looked like a kid's watch, wait a few months, repeat... Here again it looks fantastic in pictures!

[pkrussel]

I had the same experience. I tried on a gold/diamond bezel 15450 at the Botique since that’s all they had in stock and it felt pretty small. I don’t know if the diamond bezel made it look smaller or what. I love the look of it in pictures and it looks similar to modern 39mm models but felt smaller on me when on my wrist (7”+)

[holdtime]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Golden Ellipse]

Here is a 15450 against a 15202BA and a 126711chnr




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[killoman]

Very nice

[holdtime]

Nice ��

[Muxi]

May I respectfully inquire from 15450 owners if the watch only comes with 8 links? I got mine wrapped in the original plastic and there are only 8 links installed. It’s a bit tight on my 6.5-ish inch wrist.

[holdtime]

15450 10 links per side


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[holdtime]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[HBA 88]

Originally Posted by nsguy

I have a 15450, 14060 (pre-ceramic submariner) and a 116610ln (ceramic submariner date). I can take more photos tomorrow, but for now, you can see how they all compare here. To me, the 15450 and 14060 fit the same



]

What box is this? And where can I purchase one from?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Gotemandrew]

Originally Posted by myusernamez

I don't understand how it looks so big on these pictures. When I tried it on it was way smaller than the GMT Master 2, way way smaller.

It is really confusing.

[Frits1980]

15450 size has been debated many times. Some claim it wears like a pre-ceramic or daytona, others incl myself think it wears a lot smaller. Its a weird watch imo. Case size to dial size makes this piece weird. Incomparable with nothing i know. Forget (close-up) pics, they wont help. I guess its the royal oak to get for anyone with slim wrists (<6,25) but I strongly recommend you try one on before you buy it.

I ('7+ wrists) didnt, thought it would wear like a daytona and had to get a 15400 afterwards because the 15450 was way to small for me.

[CoveWatch]

Agree with the comments above... the 450 looks fantastic on close up wrist pics online.. even looks like a great size when compared side by side with some larger ref watches. But when you put it on in person, it wears a lot smaller. When I tried it on, I thought it wore much smaller than my daytona, for example. I kept wondering if they gave me a 33mm to try on instead

[JR16]

Originally Posted by CoveWatch

Agree with the comments above... the 450 looks fantastic on close up wrist pics online.. even looks like a great size when compared side by side with some larger ref watches. But when you put it on in person, it wears a lot smaller. When I tried it on, I thought it wore much smaller than my daytona, for example. I kept wondering if they gave me a 33mm to try on instead

I agree 1000%... was totally disappointed by this and then the illusion that it is abnormally thick bc of the height proportional to diameter.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro