The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 December 2012, 12:07 AM   #1
Clay
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
Have your tastes changed over the years???

I have noticed that over the many many years in this hobby my likes and dislikes have changed...
As an example there was a time when I cared not for Box & Paper watches...
But lately I have discovered a fascination with all of the bits and pieces that come (or came) with these watches...
What exactly came with this watch???
Is it original???
Is it proper???
Fascinating!
My basic love of these time pieces has never changed, but I find the direction of what I want to own has taken many roads over time...
The one thing that I find so wonderful is that if you get tired of owning something, you can simply sell it and move on...
Cheers...
Clay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2012, 12:34 AM   #2
harry in montreal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
Not really!

i seem to gravitate to the same models as i did when i was just getting into Rolex and Tudor. i could never get myself interested in a Daytona. maybe with time...
harry in montreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2012, 01:25 AM   #3
Beaumont Miller II
"TRF" Member
 
Beaumont Miller II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
Clay, great topic. A friend of mine once said that over time collections evolve, sometimes in different directions. In the past I might have passed on a particular piece if it had a few dings, nicks, swirls, and scuffs on the case. In my opinion that represents wear consistent with age without signs of abuse. However, at present those are the watches that spark my passion provided that the case is sharp with fat lugs and the original chamfers are present.
__________________
Beaumont Miller II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2012, 01:38 AM   #4
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,805
Tastes definitely change. I went toward the big-watch trend a couple of years ago, for example, but now I'm back at vintage sizes being the way to go. I don't want a hubcap on my wrist. Could be an age thing for this 40-something!
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2012, 01:47 AM   #5
eparisini
"TRF" Member
 
eparisini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Emanuele
Location: Italy
Watch: 6263 FAP
Posts: 795
Over the years maybe I'm changed year after year, always searching something beautiful, and year after year my tastes changed, always seraching something rarer and more collectible!
__________________
EAT, DRINK AND BE MAUI
http://www.rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=20260&dateline=123539  8486
eparisini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2012, 02:06 AM   #6
Vincent65
"TRF" Member
 
Vincent65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,293
I've always loved vintage and antiques and 'old stuff' in general. Had a lot in my family, including vintage one-owner watches (Heuer, V&C), but until this last 2 or 3 years, I had only previously owned new Rolex (first one in 1997). Well and truly got the bug now though!
My tastes have therefore not really changed, fundamentally. Mostly love divers and sports models. Cheers, K.
Vincent65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2012, 03:12 AM   #7
harry in montreal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
1. air king date. traded up
2. gmt (black) 16750. traded up
3. SD 16600 sold
3.5 DJ 1601/1603 and an airking winn dixie
4. flipped a few tudors,and a 1625 Tbird. nothing kept. wore then sold.
5. snowflake 7021
6. gmt 1675

full circle to a GMT over a 15 year period.
harry in montreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2012, 03:38 AM   #8
joe100
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,753
I used to think the Submariner and the GMT were the bees knees but as I go along I've realized the fixed bezels, ie the Expy 1 and 2, AK, OP are more my taste. I don't like fiddly moving parts.
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2012, 04:45 AM   #9
KZZN
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Watch: Rolex Cellini 5115
Posts: 512
Hi,

A very interesting question, and one I've actually been thinking about these last few days. I've kind of gone almost full-circle, in terms of preferring steel, then two-tone, then all gold, then back to stainless steel again.

Before I got my first Rolex, I'd been wearing a stainless-steel Seiko all my adult life, and could never have imagined myself wearing a gold watch. I just thought of gold as too gaudy, too blingy, and not for me at all.

So, when I went to get my first Rolex in 2005, I was planning on an all stainless-steel Datejust, maybe with a white gold bezel at most, and that would be that. However, at that time the new case, bracelet and dial designs had only filtered down as far as the yellow Rolesor Datejust, and not the all-steel model. And I was so blown away by the difference in quality between the old and new bracelet, that I went for the yellow Rolesor without hesitation.

Then a year or so later, I got a call from a dealer I'd asked to keep an eye out for an Oysterquartz. I'd been thinking the all-steel Datejust model, but what the dealer got was a yellow gold Day-Date. A first I was very unsure, but I went for it. And I loved it. It became more or less my daily wearer for the next six years.

And then, just this week, I actually sold the Day-Date, and as part of the deal got a white Rolesor Oysterquartz Datejust. And I have to say that when I look at photos of the Day-Date on my wrist, and compare them with the Datejust, the white metal Datejust just looks so much better on me than the yellow gold Day-Date did.

So I've come full circle, it seems, back to preferring stainless steel (or white metal, at least). So who knows what the future holds?
KZZN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2012, 12:04 PM   #10
hatidua
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 158
I've shifted toward simpler models over time. I've sold all of mine that had a date and only have one left with a bezel that rotates. My first was a Sub (30 years ago), whereas now I prefer wearing models that 99.9% of the population don't realize to be a Rolex.
hatidua is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2012, 12:35 PM   #11
JohnBoy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: John
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Watch: Rolex - a few!
Posts: 1,472
My horological horizons continue to broaden, but my taste in Rolex seems to remain about the same. I continue to collect them slowly, without flipping a single one - to date!
JohnBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2012, 01:08 PM   #12
janice&fred
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: janice
Location: St.Petersburg Fl
Watch: all of them!
Posts: 673
yes our taste has changed--->

used to be we liked fresh sparkling watches even when old, but now we are much wiser and choosey. we prefer to keep our watches as found and much prefer a watch that has not been previously "restored" (butchered) by some well meaning collector or dealer. un polished and un altered is our focus now. we also prefer oldies and with it's originally issued bracelet. not so easy to find on the net and in the more developed western world where watches pass thru many hands and dealers, but these original virgin beauties do pop up in these tropical isolated south pacific islands quite often and when they do we snap them up :)

janice

cebu
janice&fred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2012, 02:02 PM   #13
Frogman4me
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
Still prefer vintage, still prefer the submariner :)
Frogman4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2012, 02:41 PM   #14
Warnsboy
"TRF" Member
 
Warnsboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Midwest-USA
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,942
My taste has changed to less gold and more stainless, but I love both modern and vintage looks. This one from 1980 is an exception..........





or maybe I've grown to love some gilt on the dial......to set off the stainless from 1965

Warnsboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2012, 02:53 PM   #15
DrLindaPhD
"TRF" Member
 
DrLindaPhD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Linda
Location: New York State
Watch: Boys Tudor Sub
Posts: 1,131
I started with vintage Rolex watches from WWII and still love them but now I collect 1930s-1960s. I am considering branching out to small men's Rolex watches of old. I don't know what I will be collecting a year from now. Who knows? That's part of the fun.
DrLindaPhD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2012, 03:12 PM   #16
Kiwinz
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Mario
Location: USA / NZ
Watch: All sorts
Posts: 799
Good post, Mate.

Yeap, my taste certainly changed too, from TT and YG to SS and found the love and passion for Vintage.
As for different brands, No...always crowns.
Kiwinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2012, 03:30 PM   #17
Warnsboy
"TRF" Member
 
Warnsboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Midwest-USA
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,942
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrLindaPhD View Post
I started with vintage Rolex watches from WWII and still love them but now I collect 1930s-1960s. I am considering branching out to small men's Rolex watches of old. I don't know what I will be collecting a year from now. Who knows? That's part of the fun.
Linda, you have been a breath of fresh air to the true vintage colector's movement

My wife's first taste was a 14K, diamond bracelet Gruen with Rolex movement from 1940's. My grandmother gave it to her in 1984 because she could wear the small size....3.5" wrist. She has been hooked since.......Now she wears this Tudor 75090 daily......

Warnsboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2012, 04:42 PM   #18
andyboy39
"TRF" Member
 
andyboy39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New Zealand
Watch: Day Date
Posts: 1,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by swish77 View Post
tastes definitely change. I went toward the big-watch trend a couple of years ago, for example, but now i'm back at vintage sizes being the way to go. I don't want a hubcap on my wrist. Could be an age thing for this 40-something!
+1
andyboy39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2012, 09:48 AM   #19
Mike1066
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: 16600
Posts: 728
Clay:

Great topic. I've always liked Dive watches, so that hasn't changed. However, my focus has begun to narrow on vintage (I don't even look at modern watches anymore), and that is all that I see myself getting in the future. It has also narrowed to a few watches - 5508, PloProf, Rail Dials, gilt Subs, etc. I also find myself liking banged up models much more than the pristine models, as the banged up ones (so long as they are original parts) show life and wear and tear, which is what I think these watches were intended for.

V/R

Mike
__________________
V/R
Mike
Mike1066 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.