ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 December 2012, 12:07 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
|
Have your tastes changed over the years???
I have noticed that over the many many years in this hobby my likes and dislikes have changed...
As an example there was a time when I cared not for Box & Paper watches... But lately I have discovered a fascination with all of the bits and pieces that come (or came) with these watches... What exactly came with this watch??? Is it original??? Is it proper??? Fascinating! My basic love of these time pieces has never changed, but I find the direction of what I want to own has taken many roads over time... The one thing that I find so wonderful is that if you get tired of owning something, you can simply sell it and move on... Cheers... |
8 December 2012, 12:34 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
|
Not really!
i seem to gravitate to the same models as i did when i was just getting into Rolex and Tudor. i could never get myself interested in a Daytona. maybe with time... |
8 December 2012, 01:25 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
|
Clay, great topic. A friend of mine once said that over time collections evolve, sometimes in different directions. In the past I might have passed on a particular piece if it had a few dings, nicks, swirls, and scuffs on the case. In my opinion that represents wear consistent with age without signs of abuse. However, at present those are the watches that spark my passion provided that the case is sharp with fat lugs and the original chamfers are present.
__________________
|
8 December 2012, 01:38 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,805
|
Tastes definitely change. I went toward the big-watch trend a couple of years ago, for example, but now I'm back at vintage sizes being the way to go. I don't want a hubcap on my wrist. Could be an age thing for this 40-something!
|
8 December 2012, 01:47 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Emanuele
Location: Italy
Watch: 6263 FAP
Posts: 795
|
Over the years maybe I'm changed year after year, always searching something beautiful, and year after year my tastes changed, always seraching something rarer and more collectible!
__________________
EAT, DRINK AND BE MAUI |
8 December 2012, 02:06 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,293
|
I've always loved vintage and antiques and 'old stuff' in general. Had a lot in my family, including vintage one-owner watches (Heuer, V&C), but until this last 2 or 3 years, I had only previously owned new Rolex (first one in 1997). Well and truly got the bug now though!
My tastes have therefore not really changed, fundamentally. Mostly love divers and sports models. Cheers, K. |
8 December 2012, 03:12 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
|
1. air king date. traded up
2. gmt (black) 16750. traded up 3. SD 16600 sold 3.5 DJ 1601/1603 and an airking winn dixie 4. flipped a few tudors,and a 1625 Tbird. nothing kept. wore then sold. 5. snowflake 7021 6. gmt 1675 full circle to a GMT over a 15 year period. |
8 December 2012, 03:38 AM | #8 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,753
|
I used to think the Submariner and the GMT were the bees knees but as I go along I've realized the fixed bezels, ie the Expy 1 and 2, AK, OP are more my taste. I don't like fiddly moving parts.
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
8 December 2012, 04:45 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Watch: Rolex Cellini 5115
Posts: 512
|
Hi,
A very interesting question, and one I've actually been thinking about these last few days. I've kind of gone almost full-circle, in terms of preferring steel, then two-tone, then all gold, then back to stainless steel again. Before I got my first Rolex, I'd been wearing a stainless-steel Seiko all my adult life, and could never have imagined myself wearing a gold watch. I just thought of gold as too gaudy, too blingy, and not for me at all. So, when I went to get my first Rolex in 2005, I was planning on an all stainless-steel Datejust, maybe with a white gold bezel at most, and that would be that. However, at that time the new case, bracelet and dial designs had only filtered down as far as the yellow Rolesor Datejust, and not the all-steel model. And I was so blown away by the difference in quality between the old and new bracelet, that I went for the yellow Rolesor without hesitation. Then a year or so later, I got a call from a dealer I'd asked to keep an eye out for an Oysterquartz. I'd been thinking the all-steel Datejust model, but what the dealer got was a yellow gold Day-Date. A first I was very unsure, but I went for it. And I loved it. It became more or less my daily wearer for the next six years. And then, just this week, I actually sold the Day-Date, and as part of the deal got a white Rolesor Oysterquartz Datejust. And I have to say that when I look at photos of the Day-Date on my wrist, and compare them with the Datejust, the white metal Datejust just looks so much better on me than the yellow gold Day-Date did. So I've come full circle, it seems, back to preferring stainless steel (or white metal, at least). So who knows what the future holds? |
8 December 2012, 12:04 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 158
|
I've shifted toward simpler models over time. I've sold all of mine that had a date and only have one left with a bezel that rotates. My first was a Sub (30 years ago), whereas now I prefer wearing models that 99.9% of the population don't realize to be a Rolex.
|
8 December 2012, 12:35 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: John
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Watch: Rolex - a few!
Posts: 1,472
|
My horological horizons continue to broaden, but my taste in Rolex seems to remain about the same. I continue to collect them slowly, without flipping a single one - to date!
|
8 December 2012, 01:08 PM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: janice
Location: St.Petersburg Fl
Watch: all of them!
Posts: 673
|
yes our taste has changed--->
used to be we liked fresh sparkling watches even when old, but now we are much wiser and choosey. we prefer to keep our watches as found and much prefer a watch that has not been previously "restored" (butchered) by some well meaning collector or dealer. un polished and un altered is our focus now. we also prefer oldies and with it's originally issued bracelet. not so easy to find on the net and in the more developed western world where watches pass thru many hands and dealers, but these original virgin beauties do pop up in these tropical isolated south pacific islands quite often and when they do we snap them up :)
janice cebu |
8 December 2012, 02:02 PM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
|
Still prefer vintage, still prefer the submariner :)
|
8 December 2012, 02:41 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Midwest-USA
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,942
|
My taste has changed to less gold and more stainless, but I love both modern and vintage looks. This one from 1980 is an exception..........
or maybe I've grown to love some gilt on the dial......to set off the stainless from 1965 |
8 December 2012, 02:53 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Linda
Location: New York State
Watch: Boys Tudor Sub
Posts: 1,131
|
I started with vintage Rolex watches from WWII and still love them but now I collect 1930s-1960s. I am considering branching out to small men's Rolex watches of old. I don't know what I will be collecting a year from now. Who knows? That's part of the fun.
|
8 December 2012, 03:12 PM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Mario
Location: USA / NZ
Watch: All sorts
Posts: 799
|
Good post, Mate.
Yeap, my taste certainly changed too, from TT and YG to SS and found the love and passion for Vintage. As for different brands, No...always crowns. |
8 December 2012, 03:30 PM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Midwest-USA
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,942
|
Quote:
My wife's first taste was a 14K, diamond bracelet Gruen with Rolex movement from 1940's. My grandmother gave it to her in 1984 because she could wear the small size....3.5" wrist. She has been hooked since.......Now she wears this Tudor 75090 daily...... |
|
8 December 2012, 04:42 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New Zealand
Watch: Day Date
Posts: 1,409
|
|
10 December 2012, 09:48 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: 16600
Posts: 728
|
Clay:
Great topic. I've always liked Dive watches, so that hasn't changed. However, my focus has begun to narrow on vintage (I don't even look at modern watches anymore), and that is all that I see myself getting in the future. It has also narrowed to a few watches - 5508, PloProf, Rail Dials, gilt Subs, etc. I also find myself liking banged up models much more than the pristine models, as the banged up ones (so long as they are original parts) show life and wear and tear, which is what I think these watches were intended for. V/R Mike
__________________
V/R Mike |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.