ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Buckeyehunter · 15 January 2018, 12:20 PM

Hello all,

Inquiring to see if the watch the seller is selling in the pictures attached is real or fake? The crown that should be on the face at 12 is loose, and moving around in the pictures. This should be a give away that this watch is fake?

Thanks in advance.

tamiya · 15 January 2018, 12:46 PM

yeah it's pretty rough

christo4 · 15 January 2018, 12:57 PM

Maybe the date window looks wrong? Maybe too big or wrongly shaped, and looking at the date and the detail on the dial, I don't see the magnification as being appropriate. The stamping on the backside of the bracelet ...I just don't recognize that number. I thought all jubilees were 62510 or something closer to that, and I don't recall seeing any stamped in quite that heavy/crude a manner: "Rough", I'll go with that!

You might try to find a "match" on Chrono 24 for comparison. Go slow and good luck!

goldfixer21 · 15 January 2018, 12:59 PM

16233 is not a band model #
I believe this watch is no good

tamiya · 15 January 2018, 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by christo4

... and I don't recall seeing any stamped in quite that heavy/crude a manner: "Rough", I'll go with that!

Rough is the hint

, as in...

Ruff ruff!

Woof woof!

K9 on patrol, stand clear of the perimeters people...

Canook · 15 January 2018, 01:30 PM

its complete rubbish! as fake as it comes in my opinion

Dishpro01 · 15 January 2018, 01:41 PM

This one isn't even close. I can start a list of flaws but it's just about everything!! It's really fake!!

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Tools · 15 January 2018, 02:26 PM

An applied coronet could come unattached on an authentic Rolex Datejust so that in itself is not a giveaway.

However, this one is not authentic and there are plenty of other reasons to see that.

crowncollection · 15 January 2018, 10:32 PM

junk

Greatwatch1 · 16 January 2018, 12:51 AM

Piece of junk

15 January 2018, 01:30 PM	#6
Canook "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2016 Real Name: Jason Location: Aussie/Malaysia Watch: too many to list Posts: 1,470	its complete rubbish! as fake as it comes in my opinion __________________ Current lineup -116610LV Sub -16233 Tapestry Datejust -16610LV KERMIT -116600 SD4000....16612 Yachtmaster- 16710 PEPSI -216570(polar)- -Yachtmaster II 116688 126300 Datejust 41 jubilee * Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons *

15 January 2018, 02:26 PM	#8
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,033	An applied coronet could come unattached on an authentic Rolex Datejust so that in itself is not a giveaway. However, this one is not authentic and there are plenty of other reasons to see that. __________________ (Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member

15 January 2018, 10:32 PM	#9
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,157	junk __________________ watches many

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

15 January 2018, 12:46 PM	#2
tamiya "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2017 Real Name: Willy Location: AU, SG, MY Posts: 1,248	yeah it's pretty rough

15 January 2018, 12:57 PM	#3
christo4 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2016 Location: kansas city Posts: 171	Maybe the date window looks wrong? Maybe too big or wrongly shaped, and looking at the date and the detail on the dial, I don't see the magnification as being appropriate. The stamping on the backside of the bracelet ...I just don't recognize that number. I thought all jubilees were 62510 or something closer to that, and I don't recall seeing any stamped in quite that heavy/crude a manner: "Rough", I'll go with that! You might try to find a "match" on Chrono 24 for comparison. Go slow and good luck!

15 January 2018, 12:59 PM	#4
goldfixer21 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Florida Posts: 773	16233 is not a band model # I believe this watch is no good

15 January 2018, 01:41 PM	#7
Dishpro01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Real Name: Michael Location: Northern NM Watch: Rolex 16610 Posts: 181	This one isn't even close. I can start a list of flaws but it's just about everything!! It's really fake!! Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

16 January 2018, 12:51 AM	#10
Greatwatch1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Location: Uk Posts: 11	Piece of junk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)