ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 September 2022, 02:56 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 86
|
Help with mismatched (or fake?) 5512
Hello TRF.
I am looking at a watch offered at auction locally. Lots going on with this particular sale including a Seller (more specifically the auction house as this is a consignment) that is either ill informed... or not being forthright with me. I asked for a photo of the movement and inside of the case back, they replied by saying "the watch is running fine". In short, what is being presented is a 5512 with a SN of less than 1 Million, serviced in 2016 but then apparently drug down the sidewalk on the crystal. I realize the bezel insert looking essentially NEW is not a good thing, but I also have some concerns about the font and spacing on the dial and also the bracelet and clasp not being correct for the vintage Any help or insight is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Phil |
21 September 2022, 03:00 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 86
|
|
21 September 2022, 05:00 AM | #3 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,037
|
There isn't anything that would scream fake, but the images aren't good enough for a good look. I think that the hands are newer as well as the insert.
There is usually a reason why things go to auction. Frequently it's because more can often be made by up-bidding. Plexi crystals are easily polished or replaced.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
21 September 2022, 05:06 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 86
|
I was somewhat thrown off by the wordage on the invoice in the notes section, seems a little casual to me.
Thoughts on the "Rolex" and Submariner lettering being so dark? In most 5512 examples I'm seeing (early 60's?) they are lighter in color. Maybe I'm over simplifying it with the font/spacing/color thing, I'm very new to the idea of a vintage sub. |
21 September 2022, 05:13 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,037
|
My observations:
1. Pictures are poor 2. The word submariner looks red? Or at least very dark. That’s mysterious to me and looks off 3. Replacement hands 4. The Lume plots look off to me. The glistening of the seven plot would indicate modification to me. 5. obviously unoriginal bracelet I wouldn’t mess with this unless I could hold it in my hands, and closely inspect it, and see the inside. Unless of course you love surprises. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
21 September 2022, 09:00 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 86
|
I'm going to get a chance to handle it just before it goes to sale, but..... with limited knowledge/experience....it's still going to be a gamble for me.
I've asked again (in writing this time) for a pic of the movement, at least at that point maybe I'll know if the internals are correct. |
21 September 2022, 11:35 AM | #7 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,037
|
Quote:
It doesn’t even appear that the external‘s are completely correct; but I would be interested in seeing the internals Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
21 September 2022, 11:41 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 86
|
Unless the service invoice is fake/altered.... someone at Rolex believed it to be a 5512 and references the S/N....
The question might become, what is the absolute bottom dollar value of a vintage Sub, less than a million S/N, even WITH all the deficiencies? |
21 September 2022, 12:23 PM | #9 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,037
|
Quote:
True, but a lot can happen to a watch in five years. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
21 September 2022, 12:25 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: mississippi river
Posts: 2,940
|
Dial appears to be aftermarket, or poorly redone. They never mixed gold and white text on a dial.
Solid link bracelet, that you can't see the date codes on, don't really trust it but definitely not age correct. |
21 September 2022, 03:21 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Mo
Location: Dubai
Watch: 1675 GMT, DRSD
Posts: 1,432
|
They did have gold and white. This dial could be legit but hard to tell with these pictures and scratches on the crystal. Case looks like a polished PCG which is period correct.
|
22 September 2022, 12:08 AM | #12 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,037
|
Quote:
And of course how easy to craft ‘papers,’ particularly a service receipt. Bidding on this watch based on this information is wildcatting. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
22 September 2022, 01:15 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 86
|
Got some more photos from the auction house.
My thought process here (albeit admittedly under limited experience on the topic) would be that for the "right" price it would be an awesome daily. Thinking of myself as more of a "steward" of the item, maybe to just preserve or revert some of the parts back to what is correct over time? Obviously we can't go back in time and un-rig whatever has been done at this point. image1.jpgimage2.jpgimage0.jpg |
22 September 2022, 02:54 AM | #14 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,037
|
Quote:
Unfortunately, for whatever reason, the pictures are not visible to me, like your earlier ones were. Eager to see them though! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
22 September 2022, 04:42 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 86
|
|
22 September 2022, 04:46 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 86
|
Speaking of mismatched colors on the dial, here is an example of a 5512 just listed:
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=873354 |
22 September 2022, 12:19 PM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,037
|
Good add’l pics. I’m interested in others’ views; some thoughts:
1. I believe the 1560 was a chronometer grade movement (unlike the 1530 in earlier 5512s) as reflected on dial, so that’s good. 2. Any idea How much “less than 1 million, as you initially indicated, is the SN? Case back reads iii59, which most estimates would place around SN400,000. Plus 1959 is so early in the production, would it have been a 1530? Interesting piece. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
22 September 2022, 08:46 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 86
|
Case serial number is stated to be 578,480.
|
22 September 2022, 10:31 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 68
|
Not sure if I am missing something regarding the differing views on the dial originality.
Its a 5512 with red submariner text, what more is there to discuss? |
22 September 2022, 10:45 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 86
|
I'm seeing orange or "gold" (not red) looks the same or very similar to one in the classifieds I posted a link to the other day.
Looks very similar..... to me anyway. |
22 September 2022, 11:48 PM | #21 | |||
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,037
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Looks gilt-ish not reddish; also I’m unaware of a 5512 ‘red’ dial (but happy to be schooled if I’m mistaken!) and see none listed in the 17 different 5512 variations pictured in the Imai reference guide. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|||
22 September 2022, 11:50 PM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,037
|
|
23 September 2022, 01:26 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 86
|
Ultimately here it will come down to is it "worth" fooling with. I'm (obviously) not a watchmaker with a drawer full of vintage parts. I'm thinking along the lines of something nice to wear around, a conversation piece of sorts, a piece of history.
Figure this, not much in this world survives fully intact ~60 years later, particularly not something with some utility (back in the day). I am determined to at least SEE it sell (this is an live auction only, no internet bidding). It's really just a matter of what it's worth (to me) at this point, if the Auction House is being truthful and it's running, I feel like it's worth a gamble. How much ($) of a gamble?..... that I truly don't know. |
23 September 2022, 02:13 AM | #24 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,037
|
Quote:
Good luck with it! And thanks for the interesting discussion. I’ll be interested to hear how it goes and what you decide to do. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
24 September 2022, 12:05 AM | #25 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,037
|
Quote:
How’d it go Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
24 September 2022, 03:10 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 86
|
6PM tonight....
|
24 September 2022, 08:54 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 86
|
Opening bid was $7,200, sold for $10,500 plus a 15% Buyers premium.
The watch actually looked REALLY nice in person, the photos were terrible. I didn't bid, there were two main bidders in the room, it zoomed right up to $10K quick. $12,705 all in with State sales tax. A learning experience if anything! |
24 September 2022, 09:11 AM | #28 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,037
|
Quote:
Interesting! Thanks for closing the loop Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.