ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Mike B · 31 July 2008, 10:47 PM

Good day all,
I was thinking about possibly getting a new Omega Planet ocean in the next few months (more specifically, the 2900.50.91 with the rubber strap). The thing is, I currently have the SMP "bond" auto (2531.80), and with all the hype of the new Planet Ocean, and new movement (Co-axel), etc. I figure I would try one out. You guys think it's worth it to get the new PO, or save my money, and just keep what I have (well, I'm going to keep it anyway lol). Any thoughts and comments on the PO are very welcome :)

DSJ · 1 August 2008, 12:53 AM

PO is a nice watch. What other watches besides the SMP do you have? Why do you want another Seamaster? I'm just asking...

Tools · 1 August 2008, 12:58 AM

Mike

The PO is a good looking watch.. A bit much for me, but that's why there are different models..

The great thing about watches as a hobby/activity is that you don't really have to justify one for the other.. No different than stamp collecting...

Now if you're just a guy who only wants a watch to "tell time", that's OK too, but it makes the decisions harder.

Here is what I did with Omega. I got a 6 hole cherry wood watch box...It's my Omega box and the Omega collection. I never thought I would fill it but there is only one slot left now....and they all see some wrist time. And when friends learn of my Watch addiction, it's one of the boxes that come out so they can see how crazy I really am..

roadcarver · 1 August 2008, 12:58 AM

The PO (42mm) is a great watch, it has a simple design yet robust. I haven't heard of any issues with the co-axial movements for the non-chronos yet.

Do note that the PO has both sides of the glass AR coated. I'm not sure if it will bother you or not. I used to have a PO, but had to flip it since I had some financial duties to uphold and I already have the 2531.80.

Here are some side by side comparisons between the PO and 16600.

haakon59 · 1 August 2008, 01:33 AM

The PO is a nice watch--I don't see any reason to hesitate.

Mike B · 1 August 2008, 01:54 AM

Wow, thanks for the side by side comparison photos

I haven't actually went to an Omega AD yet to physically see the PO, from the looks of it, it's a BIG watch :). I was trying to decided which watch to get, a SeaDweller, or the PO. I've already owned a Sub. Date a while ago, and sold it unfourtantly

but, will soon be in the market for another watch. I've had my eye on the PO for a while, and, since I still have my "bond" model (2531.80), I figure that, while saving a few bucks, the PO would be a nice addition to my collection. The watch I had in mind was the "Big Size" PO, which is 45.5mm. My seamaster (I believe is 40mm) is a great size, but I wanted to try something a big bigger. I went to a Rolex AD a few weeks ago, and tried on a SD. I loved the watch, but I didn't want to stop there, I wanted to "test drive" other watches as well.

I will use the watch as my everyday wearer, and leave the SMP for special occasions. Being that I work in retail, she'll see some action :) That's also why I was thinking of getting her with a rubber strap, instead of a bracelet (so I won't scratch the heck out of the bracelet).

So then, the PO would survive as a good daily watch ? The only time I would take it off is the shower.

Thanks for all the responses for far :)

wilfreb · 3 August 2008, 04:59 PM

the outer AR really bothers me.

frostie · 3 August 2008, 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wilfreb

the outer AR really bothers me.

Same here

Perdu · 4 August 2008, 04:56 AM

I think the Rolex has the better movement - you can't beat a cal.3135. Also I'm not a big fan of Omega's implementation of a helium escape value. But. . . the PO is a beautiful watch, especially the 45.5mm version. The 42mm version actually wears smaller than the 41mm SmP. My choice would be the Sea Dweller if money was not a factor, but I wouldn't feel cheated if I had a PO.

feudallordcult · 7 August 2008, 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike B

Good day all,
I was thinking about possibly getting a new Omega Planet ocean in the next few months (more specifically, the 2900.50.91 with the rubber strap). The thing is, I currently have the SMP "bond" auto (2531.80), and with all the hype of the new Planet Ocean, and new movement (Co-axel), etc. I figure I would try one out. You guys think it's worth it to get the new PO, or save my money, and just keep what I have (well, I'm going to keep it anyway lol). Any thoughts and comments on the PO are very welcome :)

just bought a pre-owned 45mm PO orange bezel last night. here's my thots: it's HUGE, has presence and imho, it's definitely more value for money compared to the SD which I bought in Jan 2008. i'll be honest, rollies are way over-priced these days and that's why i stopped my quest for a polar exp-II.

as for the AR, so far so good. no problems whatsoever at the moment.

here's a lousy wristshot

ROGERB · 7 August 2008, 11:52 PM

Regarding the outer A/R coating, has anyone had it removed??
R

airhkg · 8 August 2008, 12:11 AM

Had many AR coated watches.. never a problem.

little jack · 8 August 2008, 01:40 PM

I've had my 42mm Blk on Blk PO for 6 weeks. I enjoy the weight and mass of this watch. It is completely legible in all lighting situations. Unfortunately, my beloved Sub no-date has an annoying glare from over head lighting. The exterior AR coating of the PO makes the crystal all but disappear. I don't baby this watch, but I do use common sense and take it off before working on my car or the lawn mower.
I would recommend that you get the bracelet with the purchase of the watch and then order the rubber strap later. The PO is one beautiful watch and when you see it on your wrist, you'll know what I mean.

little jack · 8 August 2008, 01:41 PM

Oh, by the way, here is shot of my Planet Ocean

WJGESQ · 9 June 2013, 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike B

Good day all,
I was thinking about possibly getting a new Omega Planet ocean in the next few months (more specifically, the 2900.50.91 with the rubber strap). The thing is, I currently have the SMP "bond" auto (2531.80), and with all the hype of the new Planet Ocean, and new movement (Co-axel), etc. I figure I would try one out. You guys think it's worth it to get the new PO, or save my money, and just keep what I have (well, I'm going to keep it anyway lol). Any thoughts and comments on the PO are very welcome :)

Having both is a good thing.

Survivor · 10 June 2013, 03:29 AM

Here's my caliber 2500......

wingku · 10 June 2013, 04:12 AM

Adding a PO to your collection you won't regret it

Boardman · 10 June 2013, 04:21 AM

They are from the same line but still different enough.

I love em all!

The PO is thick, but it's so marvelous to stare at. I love all the AR coating.

Finewatch · 10 June 2013, 11:13 AM

Was in the market for a sub or sea dweller and ended up with PO 45.5
No regrets. Like the rubber strap for daily wear as not so scratch prone

31 July 2008, 10:47 PM	#1
Mike B "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Mike Location: Gilbert, AZ Watch: DSSD, Omega SMP Posts: 3,055	Thinking of getting a new PO. Good day all, I was thinking about possibly getting a new Omega Planet ocean in the next few months (more specifically, the 2900.50.91 with the rubber strap). The thing is, I currently have the SMP "bond" auto (2531.80), and with all the hype of the new Planet Ocean, and new movement (Co-axel), etc. I figure I would try one out. You guys think it's worth it to get the new PO, or save my money, and just keep what I have (well, I'm going to keep it anyway lol). Any thoughts and comments on the PO are very welcome :)

1 August 2008, 12:53 AM	#2
DSJ "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: David Location: USA Watch: your step! Posts: 7,882	PO is a nice watch. What other watches besides the SMP do you have? Why do you want another Seamaster? I'm just asking... __________________ Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP

1 August 2008, 12:58 AM	#3
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,049	Mike The PO is a good looking watch.. A bit much for me, but that's why there are different models.. The great thing about watches as a hobby/activity is that you don't really have to justify one for the other.. No different than stamp collecting... Now if you're just a guy who only wants a watch to "tell time", that's OK too, but it makes the decisions harder. Here is what I did with Omega. I got a 6 hole cherry wood watch box...It's my Omega box and the Omega collection. I never thought I would fill it but there is only one slot left now....and they all see some wrist time. And when friends learn of my Watch addiction, it's one of the boxes that come out so they can see how crazy I really am.. __________________ (Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member

1 August 2008, 12:58 AM	#4
roadcarver "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Vernon Location: C-a-n-a-d-a Watch: 16600 Posts: 5,641	The PO (42mm) is a great watch, it has a simple design yet robust. I haven't heard of any issues with the co-axial movements for the non-chronos yet. Do note that the PO has both sides of the glass AR coated. I'm not sure if it will bother you or not. I used to have a PO, but had to flip it since I had some financial duties to uphold and I already have the 2531.80. Here are some side by side comparisons between the PO and 16600. __________________ I'm just a cook...

4 August 2008, 04:56 AM	#9
Perdu "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Gary Location: GMT-6 Watch: GMT Posts: 3,350	I think the Rolex has the better movement - you can't beat a cal.3135. Also I'm not a big fan of Omega's implementation of a helium escape value. But. . . the PO is a beautiful watch, especially the 45.5mm version. The 42mm version actually wears smaller than the 41mm SmP. My choice would be the Sea Dweller if money was not a factor, but I wouldn't feel cheated if I had a PO. __________________ Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter

1 August 2008, 01:33 AM	#5
haakon59 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Seattle Posts: 1,571	The PO is a nice watch--I don't see any reason to hesitate.

1 August 2008, 01:54 AM	#6
Mike B "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Mike Location: Gilbert, AZ Watch: DSSD, Omega SMP Posts: 3,055	Wow, thanks for the side by side comparison photos I haven't actually went to an Omega AD yet to physically see the PO, from the looks of it, it's a BIG watch :). I was trying to decided which watch to get, a SeaDweller, or the PO. I've already owned a Sub. Date a while ago, and sold it unfourtantly but, will soon be in the market for another watch. I've had my eye on the PO for a while, and, since I still have my "bond" model (2531.80), I figure that, while saving a few bucks, the PO would be a nice addition to my collection. The watch I had in mind was the "Big Size" PO, which is 45.5mm. My seamaster (I believe is 40mm) is a great size, but I wanted to try something a big bigger. I went to a Rolex AD a few weeks ago, and tried on a SD. I loved the watch, but I didn't want to stop there, I wanted to "test drive" other watches as well. I will use the watch as my everyday wearer, and leave the SMP for special occasions. Being that I work in retail, she'll see some action :) That's also why I was thinking of getting her with a rubber strap, instead of a bracelet (so I won't scratch the heck out of the bracelet). So then, the PO would survive as a good daily watch ? The only time I would take it off is the shower. Thanks for all the responses for far :)

3 August 2008, 04:59 PM	#7
wilfreb "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Miami Posts: 537	the outer AR really bothers me.

7 August 2008, 11:52 PM	#11
ROGERB "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Roger Location: WHITE ROCK BC Watch: 89 16610, 57 7914, Posts: 897	Regarding the outer A/R coating, has anyone had it removed?? R

8 August 2008, 12:11 AM	#12
airhkg Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Hong Kong Watch: Sub, SMP GMT Co-Ax Posts: 193	Had many AR coated watches.. never a problem.

8 August 2008, 01:40 PM	#13
little jack Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bob Location: Colorado Posts: 82	I've had my 42mm Blk on Blk PO for 6 weeks. I enjoy the weight and mass of this watch. It is completely legible in all lighting situations. Unfortunately, my beloved Sub no-date has an annoying glare from over head lighting. The exterior AR coating of the PO makes the crystal all but disappear. I don't baby this watch, but I do use common sense and take it off before working on my car or the lawn mower. I would recommend that you get the bracelet with the purchase of the watch and then order the rubber strap later. The PO is one beautiful watch and when you see it on your wrist, you'll know what I mean.

8 August 2008, 01:41 PM	#14
little jack Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bob Location: Colorado Posts: 82	Oh, by the way, here is shot of my Planet Ocean

10 June 2013, 04:12 AM	#17
wingku "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Wing Location: Calgary,AB,Canada Watch: the World unfold Posts: 1,019	Adding a PO to your collection you won't regret it

10 June 2013, 04:21 AM	#18
Boardman "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Jay Location: Houston Watch: Rolex, Omega, IWC Posts: 321	They are from the same line but still different enough. I love em all! The PO is thick, but it's so marvelous to stare at. I love all the AR coating.

10 June 2013, 11:13 AM	#19
Finewatch "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Hamilton Watch: GMT II C, Omega PO Posts: 182	Was in the market for a sub or sea dweller and ended up with PO 45.5 No regrets. Like the rubber strap for daily wear as not so scratch prone __________________

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)