ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

davor · 19 March 2007, 01:23 PM

ok guys have patience with this young soul...

i want to find out how big is the SD and how big is the submariner...
in translation how wide and how "tall" are the two beauties???

thanks

pcarson · 19 March 2007, 01:27 PM

I have to say, it's a pity the letters "o" and "i" are so close on a QWERTY keyboard, otherwise this could have been the most interesting thread in the history of the forum.

It reminds me of the old vaudeville gag about the guy who gets the telegram saying his Father shot himself, and was devastated until he realised that the telegraph operator had made the made mistake as Davor!

(Not funny anymore, if it ever was)

davor · 19 March 2007, 01:36 PM

Sorry Everybody 4 The Mistake....

well now everybody has a big smile on there faces reading the name of this thread...that makes it a lil bit less embarrassing 4 me

pcarson · 19 March 2007, 02:15 PM

Davor, typos are part of the fun. If JJ doesn't jump on this question and answer it beautifully in less than a minute, I'll stand naked, but for my Sub, in the town square.

puffnmo · 19 March 2007, 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pcarson

Davor, typos are part of the fun. If JJ doesn't jump on this question and answer it beautifully in less than a minute, I'll stand naked, but for my Sub, in the town square.

Wouldn't ya know it. JJ must be getting a bit of much needed sleep...

Alex Stylianou · 19 March 2007, 04:23 PM

Ahh , Just Wait For Mr Irani to Reply .

pcarson · 19 March 2007, 04:38 PM

It's killing me this waiting. Especially when I have the spec sheets up on my screen. Alas, no. To steal the thunder is to tempt the storm.

tonelar · 19 March 2007, 05:54 PM

The SD is just taller than the Submariner (by 1.65mm) with it's deeper case back accounting for most of the difference.

The face on the SD is actually 0.65mm less in diameter, but that's not easily detected due to it having a thicker crystal.

Mike has posted a chart in the past that showed the various dimensions of the SS Rolex models...

Incidentally, the Dweller weighs in a good 12 grams over the Submariner as well.

mike · 19 March 2007, 06:23 PM

Here it is,

or this,

padi56 · 19 March 2007, 06:40 PM

Well I have both,and on the wrist I feel very very little difference if wearing a shirt with cuffs or not.And I am sure the difference height of less that 2mm is not going to make any difference at all. And the extra 12 grams weight well you dont have to be built like Arnold Schwarzenegger to carry it around.

mansion · 19 March 2007, 07:19 PM

Davor,

You might want to look at this recent thread:

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=14723

JJ Irani · 19 March 2007, 08:31 PM

Well Davor,

Looks like I was too late to the party. Your questions have all been answered!!!

davor · 20 March 2007, 12:47 AM

hey u guys thanks 4 all of ur answers...and a big thanks to that somebody who changet the name of the thread

davor

nko51 · 20 March 2007, 12:52 AM

SD is good to 4000 feet vs 1000 feet Sub.
SD crystal is 2mm thick vs 1 mm for Sub.

19 March 2007, 01:23 PM	#1
davor "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: davor Location: croatia Posts: 669	Difference In Size SD Submariner. ok guys have patience with this young soul... i want to find out how big is the SD and how big is the submariner... in translation how wide and how "tall" are the two beauties??? thanks

19 March 2007, 01:27 PM	#2
pcarson Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Peter Carson Location: Australia Watch: 16610 Sub Date Posts: 265	I have to say, it's a pity the letters "o" and "i" are so close on a QWERTY keyboard, otherwise this could have been the most interesting thread in the history of the forum. It reminds me of the old vaudeville gag about the guy who gets the telegram saying his Father shot himself, and was devastated until he realised that the telegraph operator had made the made mistake as Davor! (Not funny anymore, if it ever was) Last edited by pcarson; 19 March 2007 at 06:55 PM.. Reason: Forum name changed

19 March 2007, 05:54 PM	#8
tonelar "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: Tony Location: san francisco Watch: Seadweller Posts: 1,367	The SD is just taller than the Submariner (by 1.65mm) with it's deeper case back accounting for most of the difference. The face on the SD is actually 0.65mm less in diameter, but that's not easily detected due to it having a thicker crystal. Mike has posted a chart in the past that showed the various dimensions of the SS Rolex models... Incidentally, the Dweller weighs in a good 12 grams over the Submariner as well. __________________ It's a rarity that something popular is actually right... Wear 'em with PRIDE, y'all.

19 March 2007, 06:40 PM	#10
padi56 "TRF" Life Patron Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Peter Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng Watch: ing you. Posts: 52,268	Well I have both,and on the wrist I feel very very little difference if wearing a shirt with cuffs or not.And I am sure the difference height of less that 2mm is not going to make any difference at all. And the extra 12 grams weight well you dont have to be built like Arnold Schwarzenegger to carry it around. __________________ ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder

19 March 2007, 08:31 PM	#12
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,320	Well Davor, Looks like I was too late to the party. Your questions have all been answered!!! __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

19 March 2007, 01:36 PM	#3
davor "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: davor Location: croatia Posts: 669	Sorry Everybody 4 The Mistake.... well now everybody has a big smile on there faces reading the name of this thread...that makes it a lil bit less embarrassing 4 me

19 March 2007, 02:15 PM	#4
pcarson Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Peter Carson Location: Australia Watch: 16610 Sub Date Posts: 265	Davor, typos are part of the fun. If JJ doesn't jump on this question and answer it beautifully in less than a minute, I'll stand naked, but for my Sub, in the town square.

19 March 2007, 04:23 PM	#6
Alex Stylianou "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: UK Posts: 1,785	Ahh , Just Wait For Mr Irani to Reply .

19 March 2007, 04:38 PM	#7
pcarson Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Peter Carson Location: Australia Watch: 16610 Sub Date Posts: 265	It's killing me this waiting. Especially when I have the spec sheets up on my screen. Alas, no. To steal the thunder is to tempt the storm.

19 March 2007, 06:23 PM	#9
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	Here it is, or this,

19 March 2007, 07:19 PM	#11
mansion Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: switzerland Posts: 196	Davor, You might want to look at this recent thread: http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=14723

20 March 2007, 12:47 AM	#13
davor "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: davor Location: croatia Posts: 669	hey u guys thanks 4 all of ur answers...and a big thanks to that somebody who changet the name of the thread davor

20 March 2007, 12:52 AM	#14
nko51 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Alex Location: USA Watch: TT Blue Sub Posts: 2,542	SD is good to 4000 feet vs 1000 feet Sub. SD crystal is 2mm thick vs 1 mm for Sub. __________________

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)