ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 April 2018, 11:25 AM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: JP
Location: Vietnam
Watch: 116610LN, 16610LV
Posts: 25
|
wrist size and lug to lug length are two most important factors imo
|
9 April 2018, 12:15 PM | #32 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Grant
Location: U.S.
Watch: GMT 1675 PCG Gilt
Posts: 5,718
|
Glad you posted this! I am considering a 25940 and have 7.5” wrist. Constantly wonder if I can pull it off. Looks good on you. It may inspire me to try the ROO. Appreciate all the the comments and the one about dial size making it work better, relative to case size.... enjoy it!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Just another WIS who loves to trade... |
9 April 2018, 01:34 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Bello
Location: NYC
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 698
|
Looks good!!
__________________
Ap Royal oak offshore 🌹 ♛ Sky-Dweller 326934🤍 ♛ Datejust41 126333 ♛ Datejust2 116334 💎💎 |
9 April 2018, 02:03 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sal
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: Patek/Rolex/GS
Posts: 1,096
|
I think you pull it off really well. Looks sharp, man.
My wrists are about your size-- 6 3/4, and I wear a PAM 1312 (44mm) in addition to my Breitling (also a 44) and my Green sub. But I think when (fingers crossed) I get my first Royal Oak, I'll get the 37mm in the even I can't get my hands on the Jumbo. I'll steer clear of the 41mm. |
9 April 2018, 04:59 PM | #35 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: somewhere
Posts: 350
|
looks fine
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.