The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 April 2018, 10:38 AM   #1
ksteryous
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Virginia
Posts: 23
Coming back to Rolex - Which Sub?

Hey guys, been a way from the watch world for a while. So I’m clearly out of touch with the goings on in the Rolex world lately. I had a Sea Dweller a while ago and sold it maybe 7 or 8 years ago...regretted it ever since!!

Now I’m ready to get another but going to stick with the Sub this time. I have a chance to get one from my local AD who just happened to have one in stock at a sister store...they can send it to my local store but I have to put 20% down.

I’ve never seen first hand the modern ceramic one, and from pictures alone, I’m not 100% sure I like it better than the older 5 digit non ceramic models. So I’m a little hesitant to put 20% down. It looks bulkier to me in the pics???

I’ve really had my eyes on the classifieds trying to pick up a 16610 for less $$, but then this opportunity popped up at my AD.

So realizing this is totally subjective and personal, what would you do? Stick to the used model I know I love, or just screw it, get the new one at the AD? Have the new ones been well received, holding good resale value, etc?

Thanks,
Kenton
ksteryous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 10:52 AM   #2
DLRIDES
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
DLRIDES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,596
Since you liked your SD, find a nice 116600 (pre-clops), newer yet considered a classic.



The Submariner maxi-case is not proportional to the bracelet.
__________________
”When citizens learn to vote themselves the treasury, they limit prosperity.”
DLRIDES is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 10:55 AM   #3
c41006
"TRF" Member
 
c41006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Joshua
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Pelagos
Posts: 7,918
Coming back to Rolex - Which Sub?

You can’t go wrong with the 5 digit models but you should try on a ceramic Sub before you make a final decision.
c41006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 10:56 AM   #4
Urosfan
"TRF" Member
 
Urosfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,184
Welcome back sub nd would be a great choice imo
Urosfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 10:57 AM   #5
Finslayer83
"TRF" Member
 
Finslayer83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tennessee
Watch: DW-5600
Posts: 1,584
I preferred the 14060M until I held it next to a 114060....it fits the price better in terms of feel and most modern design.

The bracelet is awesome, beyond awesome.

Plus you get killer good lume.
Finslayer83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 11:15 AM   #6
HogwldFLTR
2024 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLRIDES View Post
Since you liked your SD, find a nice 116600 (pre-clops), newer yet considered a classic.



The Submariner maxi-case is not proportional to the bracelet.
I agree; it's more of a classic design then any of the other ceramic bezel watches which Rolex makes.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 11:24 AM   #7
ksteryous
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Virginia
Posts: 23
Hey so is the maxi-case on the new one? Just not familiar with that term.

And yeah, I’d go back to the SD, but price is a little issue right now.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DLRIDES View Post
Since you liked your SD, find a nice 116600 (pre-clops), newer yet considered a classic.



The Submariner maxi-case is not proportional to the bracelet.
ksteryous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 12:29 PM   #8
HogwldFLTR
2024 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,256
The maxi cases have significantly wider lugs everywhere and they tend to be boxy in appearance instead of tapered looking. Notice how the taper decreased from the 14060 to the 114060 with the 116600 being more in the middle. Also the crown guard lugs increase in width going from the 14060 to the 114060. I wish I had all three side by side to show you.

Here's my 116600:



My former 114060 with its really wide crown guard lugs,



and my 14060 which I'm wearing tonight.

__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 01:05 PM   #9
ksteryous
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Virginia
Posts: 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR View Post
The maxi cases have significantly wider lugs everywhere and they tend to be boxy in appearance instead of tapered looking. Notice how the taper decreased from the 14060 to the 114060 with the 116600 being more in the middle. Also the crown guard lugs increase in width going from the 14060 to the 114060. I wish I had all three side by side to show you.
Hmmm...that’s very helpful. I’m just not sure I’m digging the maxi case on the Sub. Definitely would help to actually see it on and hold it.
ksteryous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 01:39 PM   #10
MTdweller
"TRF" Member
 
MTdweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Ty
Location: West Coast
Watch: the time fly!
Posts: 1,475
I wanted the 16613LB for years and when the six-digit models came out, I wasn’t a big fan of the wider lugs. But when I finally got to handle the 116613LB, the ceramic bezel, bracelet (with Glidelock clasp), and overall heft of the watch was noticeably superior to the old five-digit models. The concerns I had with the wider lugs (from looking at pictures) were no longer a factor for me.

Bottom line: I would try on a SubC before you make your decision. Good luck!
MTdweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 01:43 PM   #11
Chadkd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 13
I feel the same way. The new subs are too wide in the hips. I wanted to like it, but didn’t. Bought a used 2007/2008 sub instead.
Chadkd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 01:56 PM   #12
kauffee
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,379
Overall the ceramic Subs feel more solid to me than 5 digit. Bezel, case, and especially bracelet are all over-engineered in a good way. You should try it on before making a decision. Remember that at the current moment, you can’t really go wrong buying a new Sub. If you decide it’s not for you, you can recoup your money (and maybe more) in a heartbeat.
kauffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 02:57 PM   #13
Andrés G
"TRF" Member
 
Andrés G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 3,391
I’ve had several 5 digit and 6 digit Subs. I greatly prefer the newer version.
Andrés G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 02:59 PM   #14
WEST HAM ROLEX
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London/Asia
Watch: GMT LN/SD43/D Blue
Posts: 872
I have an old no date

But you could go 114060
WEST HAM ROLEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 03:24 PM   #15
Nairn1980
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,254
How about a GMT instead?
Nairn1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 04:04 PM   #16
Quicksilver
"TRF" Member
 
Quicksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
Coming back to Rolex - Which Sub?

I had a 114060 ceramic. The fit and finish and the bracelet were superb. But those lugs! They destroy the classic proportions of the watch and make it look boxy (more so than the GMT where the lugs don’t seem quite as noticeable). The bezel also seemed wider. After a while I found the lugs so ugly and tiresome that I flipped it for a 14060M which I much prefer. My advice is to try both. As an old Rolex aficionado that has been away for a while, you may find the change startling.

Here are some comparison pics -


__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M.
Quicksilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 06:17 PM   #17
andyxxx
"TRF" Member
 
andyxxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Andy
Location: England
Watch: with confusion
Posts: 626
I have the latest sub c and the earlier model.

The ceramic does not look as 'sleek' but feels far more substantial (I think mainly because of the bracelet) and I choose it out of the two every time.
andyxxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 06:24 PM   #18
SeaDweller50
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Sandy
Location: England.
Watch: 14060M 2 liner
Posts: 3,204
Plus one for the SD4K for the best of both worlds but you will pay a premium for one now.
SeaDweller50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 06:27 PM   #19
kans86
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Berlin
Posts: 1,340
I would try a ceramic one before making a decision. I prefer the 5 digit but others may opt for the new one.
kans86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 07:41 PM   #20
WJGESQ
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
Hulk.
WJGESQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 07:50 PM   #21
The Libertine
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLRIDES View Post
Since you liked your SD, find a nice 116600 (pre-clops), newer yet considered a classic.



The Submariner maxi-case is not proportional to the bracelet.
#truth.
The Libertine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 08:32 PM   #22
mmmmp
"TRF" Member
 
mmmmp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mark P
Location: Toronto
Watch: SS Wimbledon DJ41
Posts: 2,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTdweller View Post
I wanted the 16613LB for years and when the six-digit models came out, I wasn’t a big fan of the wider lugs. But when I finally got to handle the 116613LB, the ceramic bezel, bracelet (with Glidelock clasp), and overall heft of the watch was noticeably superior to the old five-digit models. The concerns I had with the wider lugs (from looking at pictures) were no longer a factor for me.

Bottom line: I would try on a SubC before you make your decision. Good luck!
Mtdweller - Your story is identical to mine!

To the OP all I want to add / say is: I'd like to think you'll go to an AD and see it in person. Go see it, try it on, you know, get a feel for the watch. Sometimes, as most of us know, a piece can look and feel quite different from photos or video. Often a watch looks even *better* when inspected 'up close and personal' although sometimes the opposite is true.

In any event to make a significant purchase 'sight unseen' is not only a little dangerous but a touch foolhardy. (Not calling *you* foolish but I've witnessed pretty - let's say heavily...*motivated* buyers. I'm guilty of impulse buying too but never on expensive items.

Slide down to your local AD and really give the piece a solid visual inspection. Hell, when it's on your wrist hammer off some cell phone pix to look at when you get home. If the watch has a GlideLock bracelet, that's a bonus as you'll be able to get a great fit with little hassle.

Nice to have you back to TRF and good luck with your upcoming acquisition. Make sure to create an incoming thread to post some pics.

Cheers,
Mark

Sent from my SGH-I547C using Tapatalk
mmmmp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 10:39 PM   #23
Angelis
"TRF" Member
 
Angelis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Sy
Location: London
Watch: GMT Coke
Posts: 63
I was looking at getting a SubC and tried it at a Grey Seller on Wednesday. I really wanted to like it and would have got it there and then but it felt very large and blocky. A few hours later and I purchased a 14060M. Definetly try one one before you buy.

Yesterday I ordered a NATO strap for it whilst the steel bracelet goes off for refurbishment. The plan was to use it temporarily but I'm really liking the NATO. So much so I've just ordered another 3 different colours from Amazon and will swap the NATo's depending on what I'm wearing.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg NATO.jpg (55.2 KB, 232 views)
File Type: jpg nato2.jpg (37.6 KB, 233 views)
Angelis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 10:51 PM   #24
siempreko
"TRF" Member
 
siempreko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Maryland, USA
Watch: Sometimes
Posts: 1,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTdweller View Post
I wanted the 16613LB for years and when the six-digit models came out, I wasn’t a big fan of the wider lugs. But when I finally got to handle the 116613LB, the ceramic bezel, bracelet (with Glidelock clasp), and overall heft of the watch was noticeably superior to the old five-digit models. The concerns I had with the wider lugs (from looking at pictures) were no longer a factor for me.

Bottom line: I would try on a SubC before you make your decision. Good luck!


I had the exact same experience! Plus the benefit of the solid links!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
siempreko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 11:12 PM   #25
Tombstone
"TRF" Member
 
Tombstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Richard
Location: LV, NV
Watch: LV Sub and others
Posts: 2,689
Love the SubC no date. A bit crazy right now trying to get one most ADs have had only a handful since Nov. of 2017.
__________________
Always working...by choice
Tombstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2018, 11:17 PM   #26
MCO1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Missouri USA
Watch: Daytona C white
Posts: 2,248
The old ones are great! I don't love the boxy lugs as well but if I were coming back into the fold I would go with the new one. I would do it for the ceramic bezel and bracelet alone.
MCO1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2018, 12:12 AM   #27
T01
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: T
Location: AZ, NV, CA
Posts: 6,481
ND sub
T01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2018, 12:12 AM   #28
Maiden
"TRF" Member
 
Maiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,650
You must simply try it on and decide what is right for YOU. Only YOU will know this. No right answer either way. I would add that if you are in a situation where you may be adversely affected by the current SS shortages (ie if you pass on this you may have trouble sourcing another in a reasonable time frame) you should consider trying the Sub C site unseen as you will probably be able to unload for little to no loss if you don't bond with it. Good luck.
__________________
Rolex 116613LN
Rolex 16610LN
Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 41mm
Omega Geneve
Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAY2112
Orient Ray 2
Maiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2018, 12:15 AM   #29
ksteryous
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Virginia
Posts: 23
Good stuff guys...I guess bottom line is I need to at least try on the new one before I decide against it. And I guess the fact that my AD can even get one right now is a bit lucky, so maybe I just need to take advantage of that.

Plus, like someone said, if I really end up not liking the boxy look, I probably won't have a difficult time selling it, and could easily go for a 5 digit model then.
ksteryous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2018, 12:23 AM   #30
mjclark32
"TRF" Member
 
mjclark32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by ksteryous View Post
Good stuff guys...I guess bottom line is I need to at least try on the new one before I decide against it. And I guess the fact that my AD can even get one right now is a bit lucky, so maybe I just need to take advantage of that.

Plus, like someone said, if I really end up not liking the boxy look, I probably won't have a difficult time selling it, and could easily go for a 5 digit model then.
Yeah, try it on and go from there.
The new subs just don't work for me either, but I have a few friends with them and they love them. Maybe if I never had a 5 digit I'd have a different opinion... who knows
All the best
__________________
mjclark32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.