The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 23 October 2021, 02:45 AM   #1
Ferdelious
2024 Pledge Member
 
Ferdelious's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Matt
Location: Tampa, FL
Watch: Hulk/SD4K/SeaQ/P39
Posts: 3,177
Glashutte SeaQ Blue

I'm playing the waiting game for a Yacht-Master 126622 Blue Dial from my AD. Recently the Glashutte SeaQ Blue 39.5mm has caught my eye. Would it be crazy to cancel the Rolex order and go with the SeaQ? Price is cheaper and Glashutte has a solid history in horology.

For those who have both Rolex and Glashutte, what are your thoughts? Currently own 116600 SD and 116610LV.
__________________
Why is it, "A penny for your thoughts," but, "you have to put your two cents in?" Somebody's making a penny.
Ferdelious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2021, 03:00 AM   #2
DVR
"TRF" Member
 
DVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Denis
Location: Flanders, EU
Watch: Diver watches
Posts: 1,844
You shouldn't compare a Rolex to a GO. You can of course but you shouldn't.
They play in different categories. One is a hyped but extremely good watch. The other is HH.
I have owned a dozen Rolexes, still own 2. Great watches. But the SeaQ is 'next level'.

I love mine.

__________________
AP - BP - UN - GO - GS - JLC - RLX
DVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2021, 03:23 AM   #3
gnuyork
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,247
Not crazy. I'd take the SeaQ (39.5mm version) over any new Rolex at this point (my opinion). Though the Yachtmaster is one of the few new ones I would certainly consider myself.
gnuyork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2021, 05:57 AM   #4
Justindo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: California
Posts: 2,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVR View Post
You shouldn't compare a Rolex to a GO. You can of course but you shouldn't.
They play in different categories. One is a hyped but extremely good watch. The other is HH.
I have owned a dozen Rolexes, still own 2. Great watches. But the SeaQ is 'next level'.

I love mine.

I agree with all of this.
Justindo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2021, 06:06 AM   #5
Ferdelious
2024 Pledge Member
 
Ferdelious's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Matt
Location: Tampa, FL
Watch: Hulk/SD4K/SeaQ/P39
Posts: 3,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVR View Post
You shouldn't compare a Rolex to a GO. You can of course but you shouldn't.
They play in different categories. One is a hyped but extremely good watch. The other is HH.
I have owned a dozen Rolexes, still own 2. Great watches. But the SeaQ is 'next level'.

I love mine.

Great looking watch. I'd actually like to try on the 43.5mm Panorama version to see how it fits. Thank you for the feedback.
__________________
Why is it, "A penny for your thoughts," but, "you have to put your two cents in?" Somebody's making a penny.
Ferdelious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2021, 06:47 AM   #6
PhilLynott
"TRF" Member
 
PhilLynott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Illinois
Watch: Breguet marine
Posts: 698
I haven't seen the 39.5 in person that's more the size I'd normally prefer but my favorite parts about the 43.5 are the see thru caseback and pano-date. If they could find a way to do all that in a 41 I'd walk into an AD and throw my wallet at them but the 43.5 still works and is an awesome watch just gotta own the larger size. Just took it on an adventure in Iceland felt like it was made for that country.
PhilLynott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2021, 07:25 AM   #7
2001jesper
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Jesper
Location: Earth
Watch: 116234
Posts: 1,644
Have to agree with most reviewers out there, that the lack of a see-through caseback is disappointing, considering the beauty right behind.
2001jesper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2021, 08:06 AM   #8
GB-man
2024 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,850
Not sure I would call a sea q HH but it’s definitely a cut above in many regards.

I’d say go for it.
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2021, 08:38 AM   #9
stockae92
"TRF" Member
 
stockae92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,878
No brainer, go with GO. They are not playing in the same league.

Even stronger case to do it given that you already have 2 other Rolex.
__________________
135
├┼┼╕
246 R
stockae92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2021, 09:37 AM   #10
dchang81
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 2,040
i think the spacing of the numerals works better for the 39.5 but i like the movement and exhibition back of the larger one.

edit: i sold my 39.5 to buy my wife some jewelry. RARELY regret selling watches especially if to fund gifts, but now im strongly considering getting another. 39.5 sizing i thought was great, but just to try something different may go 43.2. seems to say GO more than the 39.5. though the reed green would match my wife's hulk
dchang81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2021, 09:42 AM   #11
RidingDonkeys
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 147
These two aren't even in the same arena. GO wins every time.

Sent from the voices in my head and transcribed by their drinking buddy.
RidingDonkeys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2021, 04:35 PM   #12
DVR
"TRF" Member
 
DVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Denis
Location: Flanders, EU
Watch: Diver watches
Posts: 1,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Not sure I would call a sea q HH
The finish and execution of my 43.2 SeaQ is just a tad higher than a AP ROO. I can compare as I owned that one for several years.

I believe the BP FF is HH and the SeaQ is on the same level, not saying they are finished in the same manner but the end result is in both cases 'the ultimate diver watch'. Which of those two wins is personal preference.

__________________
AP - BP - UN - GO - GS - JLC - RLX
DVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2021, 11:29 PM   #13
GB-man
2024 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,850
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVR View Post
The finish and execution of my 43.2 SeaQ is just a tad higher than a AP ROO. I can compare as I owned that one for several years.

I believe the BP FF is HH and the SeaQ is on the same level, not saying they are finished in the same manner but the end result is in both cases 'the ultimate diver watch'. Which of those two wins is personal preference.


Looks great honestly I haven’t handled a sea q yet. I was speaking more in regards to movement finishing but on a diver that’s secondary to function and the case and dial etc for me.

HH is so subjective it’s not really worth debating anything on the fringe. We can all agree a datograph or 5370 is HH but there’s plenty of stuff that’s made to a higher standard than 95% of watches even if it’s not at the very high end.

I’d very much like to try one of these on. Congrats
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2021, 11:41 PM   #14
DVR
"TRF" Member
 
DVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Denis
Location: Flanders, EU
Watch: Diver watches
Posts: 1,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
I was speaking more in regards to movement finishing
I agree with you, this describes Caliber 36 which is powering the SeaQ (with the panorama date complication added becoming 36-13).

HH or not ? For me a definite yes.

https://deployant.com/glashutte-orig...or-excellence/
__________________
AP - BP - UN - GO - GS - JLC - RLX
DVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2021, 11:47 PM   #15
GB-man
2024 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,850
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVR View Post
I agree with you, this describes Caliber 36 which is powering the SeaQ (with the panorama date complication added becoming 36-13).

HH or not ? For me a definite yes.

https://deployant.com/glashutte-orig...or-excellence/

You make a good case
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2021, 11:47 PM   #16
nan7yo
"TRF" Member
 
nan7yo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: APAC
Posts: 1,033
Glashutte SeaQ Blue

I went to the boutique to try it on, it’s a great watch and almost pull the trigger.

The only minor thing that didn’t meet my expectation is the polishing & finishing of the SS case.





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
nan7yo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2021, 12:25 AM   #17
DVR
"TRF" Member
 
DVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Denis
Location: Flanders, EU
Watch: Diver watches
Posts: 1,844
The execution of the case is better than anything I have ever owned.

How can it "not meet your expectations" when the watch is wrapped in plastic?
Or they unwrapped the watch for your examination but when you took the pictures it was wrapped again?

Whatever, with or without plastic. The SeaQ made me a GO fanboy. I am extremely picky and if something bothers me it goes out the door sooner than later.
In this case I recently bought my second GO because I learned from the SeaQ you get HH for Rolex money.

__________________
AP - BP - UN - GO - GS - JLC - RLX
DVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2021, 12:58 AM   #18
DVR
"TRF" Member
 
DVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Denis
Location: Flanders, EU
Watch: Diver watches
Posts: 1,844
A fanboy picture from a few minutes ago. SeaQ rules, together with the BP FF, nothing else matters. :)
__________________
AP - BP - UN - GO - GS - JLC - RLX
DVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2021, 01:36 AM   #19
nan7yo
"TRF" Member
 
nan7yo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: APAC
Posts: 1,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVR View Post
The execution of the case is better than anything I have ever owned.

How can it "not meet your expectations" when the watch is wrapped in plastic?
Or they unwrapped the watch for your examination but when you took the pictures it was wrapped again?

Whatever, with or without plastic. The SeaQ made me a GO fanboy. I am extremely picky and if something bothers me it goes out the door sooner than later.
In this case I recently bought my second GO because I learned from the SeaQ you get HH for Rolex money.


You are right, of course the sales unwrapped the watch for me, just that I didn’t take another photo.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying the quality is bad (it’s a G.O.!), might be the vintage vertical satin finish on the case side and the case shape remind me of my Seiko 62mas divers.

The panorama date with 100 hours power reserved and bigger case is different, I really love the transparent case back. However my 16.5cm wrist just can’t carry it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
nan7yo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2021, 02:02 AM   #20
DVR
"TRF" Member
 
DVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Denis
Location: Flanders, EU
Watch: Diver watches
Posts: 1,844
I own the SLA017 and really, with all due respect to Seiko, you can't compare these watches with each other. I do not want to question your findings but can't agree with them. The watch case of the SeaQ is made in such a way that there is no debate possible IMO.
So I am surprised to read your comment.
Even between the horns everything is finished to such a high degree it is crazy.
__________________
AP - BP - UN - GO - GS - JLC - RLX
DVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2021, 08:40 PM   #21
Ferdelious
2024 Pledge Member
 
Ferdelious's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Matt
Location: Tampa, FL
Watch: Hulk/SD4K/SeaQ/P39
Posts: 3,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVR View Post
The finish and execution of my 43.2 SeaQ is just a tad higher than a AP ROO. I can compare as I owned that one for several years.

I believe the BP FF is HH and the SeaQ is on the same level, not saying they are finished in the same manner but the end result is in both cases 'the ultimate diver watch'. Which of those two wins is personal preference.


Does the 43mm wear like a 43mm? I feel like the Submariner is the biggest watch I can pull off with my size wrist. I definitely prefer the Panorama to the standard SeaQ.

I plan on going to an AD a few hours away to try on both GO SeaQs and some Fifty Fathoms variations.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Why is it, "A penny for your thoughts," but, "you have to put your two cents in?" Somebody's making a penny.
Ferdelious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2021, 10:33 PM   #22
DVR
"TRF" Member
 
DVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Denis
Location: Flanders, EU
Watch: Diver watches
Posts: 1,844
It wears true to size. So yes, it is a 'substantial' watch but anyone with a wrist from 16cm and over can wear it. A sport watch can (and should) be prominent on the wrist. Allow your brain the time to adjust to the bigger watch and you'll be fine.
__________________
AP - BP - UN - GO - GS - JLC - RLX
DVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2021, 10:56 PM   #23
ap1
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,026
I like the case shape of the 39.5 cq. The bezel action is no where near that of a Rolex sub. Also, the bracelet was a bit wide for my liking on a 39.5mm. It’s a nice watch but I’d take a sub all day long. As expected, resale was meh. I lost about 1500 but that’s ok and part of owning these niche brands. Only thing that was excellent was the dial.
At least the large one has long power reserve etc. the lume lasted about 3 mins
ap1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2021, 11:10 PM   #24
DVR
"TRF" Member
 
DVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Denis
Location: Flanders, EU
Watch: Diver watches
Posts: 1,844
Bezel action is best in class. Indeed nowhere near the smooth Rolex bezel.
Al of my Sub's had the same problem, the bezel turns without me wanting it to. Their is simply not enough resistance. Normal for a luxury watch but not for a real tool watch.
The SeaQ bezel turns very mechanic and with hard clicks. It is meant to be this way!
This guy has it right: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2N14XK6fms&t=387s

The lume is an allnighter with my SeaQ. Without even specially charging it.
But hey, to each their own.
__________________
AP - BP - UN - GO - GS - JLC - RLX
DVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2021, 01:38 PM   #25
Birch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 101
Ugh. Right when I think I have made my decision for the blue Santos, I see this thread.
Birch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2021, 04:03 PM   #26
squall1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 443


There may be reasons for going with Rolex over GO, but GO is by far a better watch. The finishing is outstanding as many have pointed out, but the dials...pictures just don't capture how incredible they are.

I'd say the 43 wears like a 43, but it is a substantial watch. Yes, you get used to it, but if there are any concerns I'd recommend trying it on first before committing to it.
squall1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2021, 11:29 PM   #27
PhilLynott
"TRF" Member
 
PhilLynott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Illinois
Watch: Breguet marine
Posts: 698
Quote:
Originally Posted by squall1 View Post


There may be reasons for going with Rolex over GO, but GO is by far a better watch. The finishing is outstanding as many have pointed out, but the dials...pictures just don't capture how incredible they are.

I'd say the 43 wears like a 43, but it is a substantial watch. Yes, you get used to it, but if there are any concerns I'd recommend trying it on first before committing to it.
It's so hard to capture the blue dial in pics it's a struggle I know well but man it's a beautiful dial. I had it at the bank for a few weeks recently and opened the SDB and saw the light hit the dial and thought how on earth did I leave this for weeks
PhilLynott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2021, 04:11 AM   #28
cotway
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Zeitwerk Date
Posts: 287
Love the blue. Just changed over my green from the bracelet to the deployment strap. Missing the quick adjust from the bracelet though…enjoy…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
cotway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2021, 09:34 AM   #29
mbalmz
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
mbalmz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: marc
Location: nyc
Posts: 1,354
I’m looking into this exact watch currently—I’ve tried it on and it’s outstanding.
__________________
_______________
___________
_______
___

instagram: @brooklynwatchguy
mbalmz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2021, 11:24 AM   #30
SoylentGreenChi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: États-Unis
Watch: Patek, Rolex, Sinn
Posts: 836
I bought the green SeaQ this past summer, and absolutely love it. I have several Rolexes - which I appreciate - and my sense is that the GO is finished to an equal if not better standard. I also like the under the radar nature of the GO, but that could be a detractor depending on your preferences.
SoylentGreenChi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.