The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10 August 2011, 10:40 PM   #1
PanosI
2024 Pledge Member
 
PanosI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Panos
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: 16710
Posts: 8,704
312-000, 1950-luminor case, exhibition-solid caseback

Some photos for the viewing pleasure of TRF members and to better understand the differences in the cases 1950 and Luminor and transparent and not casebacks.


In some pics 312 is above and in others 000, they are also shoot from both sides and from different angles.

Enjoy







































































PanosI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2011, 11:01 PM   #2
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
Very nice shots for differences in 1950 vs base.
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2011, 11:03 PM   #3
jay_man2
"TRF" Member
 
jay_man2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jay
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,490
Great comparison shots!
jay_man2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2011, 11:23 PM   #4
karmatp
"TRF" Member
 
karmatp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
Nice comparison Panos. Enjoy those two, great combo.
__________________
My grails:
karmatp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2011, 11:30 PM   #5
marcinthemiddle
Vacated
 
marcinthemiddle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Marc
Location: Connecticut
Watch: PAM 111 'N'
Posts: 2,558
Great shots, Panos!
I definitely like the sandwich dial and 1950's case a whole lot more than the standard Luminor case/sausage dial combo.
__________________
NAWCC Member
Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

Executive Dorklehead
marcinthemiddle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2011, 11:32 PM   #6
superb
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: anywhere but here
Posts: 690
Thanks for the comparison pics.
superb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2011, 02:16 AM   #7
MortgageGuy
"TRF" Member
 
MortgageGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Adam
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: Me
Posts: 9,935
Great pics, love that 312
__________________
The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki
MortgageGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2011, 02:18 AM   #8
ocwatching
"TRF" Member
 
ocwatching's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
nicely done...
__________________
too much into watches...
ocwatching is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2011, 02:45 AM   #9
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
Great comparison PICs Panos, thanks for sharing.

Gotta Luv that 000.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2011, 08:28 AM   #10
timepieceaddict
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Nick
Location: Sussex, UK
Watch: 116520, Pam 312
Posts: 286
You have good taste! I have the same pair!!
timepieceaddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2011, 02:28 PM   #11
mocheen
"TRF" Member
 
mocheen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Aaron
Location: San Francisco
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 187
What a great pair!
mocheen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2011, 05:17 PM   #12
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
I still feel the date throws the balance off from the 312. I wish it had no date.
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2011, 08:46 PM   #13
aussiewatchnut
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: mark pearce
Location: australia
Watch: PO, 20000ft Diver
Posts: 170
Great shots. Thanks.
aussiewatchnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 August 2011, 01:13 PM   #14
TopNotchChach
"TRF" Member
 
TopNotchChach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Near the Ocean!
Watch: 116610
Posts: 1,253
Mos def love the 50s case I just want to spend that much.
I prefer a sandwich dial, seconds hand (or no seconds) with the 50s case. That would be the best! However, it wouldnt need to be limited or pricey! I don't favor the 9 and the seconds right next to each other.

Great pics!
TopNotchChach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 August 2011, 08:31 PM   #15
walds11
"TRF" Member
 
walds11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,634
Very nice comaprison pics. Those pics really show how much thicker the 1950 case is compared to the Luminor case. Any comparsion shots of a 1950 case vs. Lumnor Marina Auto (104)?
__________________
Adam
walds11 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2011, 12:13 AM   #16
fc3s2k
"TRF" Member
 
fc3s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Barry
Location: california
Watch: OFFICINE PANERAI
Posts: 1,289
Putting it side by side, the 1950 case is sexier with all those curves!!!

Looking at your photos, I'm glad I went with the 312!!!!

Thanks for sharing
__________________
fc3s2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.