ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

GsurgBM · 7 May 2017, 06:49 AM

Wow. Tough choice. Not sure which I'd give up.

gwalker · 9 May 2017, 04:55 PM

Sub

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

OutofControl8 · 9 May 2017, 05:09 PM

I say bluesy but that is my opinion. I'm a little bias though

roadie1 · 9 May 2017, 08:32 PM

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SpyShops718 · 9 May 2017, 08:38 PM

BLNR all the way, two-tones are the thing of the past, late 90s-2009 and the only two-tones that are acceptable are the classic or vintage. Also the newer subs are so ugly only the white gold one is ok

shenzenus · 10 May 2017, 12:21 AM

If you want to look stunning, Bluesy. Otherwise...

Mirx · 10 May 2017, 12:45 AM

BLNR for me too . . .

cdbeaver66 · 10 May 2017, 12:56 AM

BLNR for me

ny_yeti · 10 May 2017, 12:57 AM

Bluesy. Iconic, timeless and classy!

breitlings · 10 May 2017, 03:32 AM

Full gold bluesy>blnr = 16710 > two tone bluesy. Imo

Lemieux66 · 10 May 2017, 03:56 AM

116613LB. The blue, gold and silver colour scheme works so well. Also I find the bezel handy for timing things during the day.

subtona · 10 May 2017, 04:05 AM

Steel over TT

Pmt2 · 10 May 2017, 05:21 AM

Blnr would be my choice. The bluesy is more of a weekend watch. It's way too loud. It's beautiful but not for an everyday piece.

Old Geezer · 10 May 2017, 05:30 AM

Bluesy. IMO it can be dressed up or down.

GsurgBM · 10 May 2017, 05:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpyShops718

BLNR all the way, two-tones are the thing of the past, late 90s-2009 and the only two-tones that are acceptable are the classic or vintage. Also the newer subs are so ugly only the white gold one is ok

Lol. Yeah, ok. Two tone may not be your thing, and that's fine. But they sell a boat load of them, so I wouldn't say they are a thing of the past. That's personal perception.

BDL · 10 May 2017, 06:42 AM

I think in the near future, Gold is coming back in a big way, the Bluesey is starting to become my 100% obsession.

roaddog359 · 10 May 2017, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BDL

I think in the near future, Gold is coming back in a big way, the Bluesey is starting to become my 100% obsession.

Climb aboard the bluesy train!

superstarmar · 24 June 2017, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BDL

I think in the near future, Gold is coming back in a big way, the Bluesey is starting to become my 100% obsession.

I agree ... it's a Rolex icon !!!
Arguably one of the most recognizable Rolex sport models !!!!

116710er · 24 June 2017, 07:57 PM

BLNR all the way, no question.

WEST HAM ROLEX · 24 June 2017, 10:55 PM

BLNR for sure,,,

chfoong · 24 June 2017, 11:00 PM

Bluesy, blnr is not even a close second, just my opinion

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

zjd168 · 24 June 2017, 11:27 PM

Blnr if only one watch. Bluesy is too flashy in many situations

dr.fiddy · 24 June 2017, 11:57 PM

Canefan1 · 25 June 2017, 12:32 AM

IMO not even close. 116613LB

Muzz · 25 June 2017, 01:44 AM

LB for me, all day long. I really like the BLNR but I love the LB. I have said it many times but it can be my one and only very easily.

carwash66 · 25 June 2017, 04:26 AM

No contest. Sub C

lig · 25 June 2017, 05:38 AM

I'm allergic to two-tone. BLNR all the way. :)

WS9D · 25 June 2017, 05:55 AM

I have a bluesy and a 116710LN. Compared the LN to the BLNR as I was thinking of flipping. In a lot of low light conditions,the BLNR looks almost the same as a LN. So I didn't flip. It's a beautiful watch, just didn't do much for ME in person. My vote is bluesy. It's the only watch anyone ever compliments me on (not that I'm looking for them) outside of an AD or WIS type. Those ppl compliment the Pepsi and D-Blue. A lot of ppl say bluesy is a weekend watch as it's flashy. The reality is, in a world of apple watches, no one really cares but you.

If I were to shrink my collection to two pieces, I would keep bluesy and D-blue.

Boaters · 25 June 2017, 06:08 AM

All super nice but BLNR

BiH115 · 25 June 2017, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikesupremedunk

Blnr but even then I wouldn't choose it for my only watch. It's pretty flashy in real life and I'd rather have a LN sub for my only watch if you are going to wear it daily.

TT bluesy will get old pretty fast as an only watch.

Strange, my BLNR doesn't seem that flashy to me, and it's my main watch currently, though my collection is a little small for now.

Is it the pcl's you think that give off that vibe, or?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beauregard

I honestly think I'd go for the BLNR, for me a GMT is more practical than a dive watch and the blue/black is pretty choice looking.

Exactly! Still want the LVc though as my next Rolex. I love the crazy colors, they're just perfect.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

10 May 2017, 12:56 AM	#128
cdbeaver66 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: Surrey/W.SussexUK Posts: 1,340	BLNR for me __________________ 1. Breitling Colt Chronograph 2. Melbourne Watch Company Portsea 3. Tudor Black Bay ETA Blue 4.Rolex GMT Master IIc LN 5. Tudor Heritage Ranger 6. Tudor Pelagos LHD 7. Tudor Black Bay Bronze Bucherer Blue Edition 8. Tudor Black Bay GMT 9. Tudor Black Bay Harrods Instagram: mykicksandticks

10 May 2017, 04:05 AM	#132
subtona "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: gus Location: East Coast Watch: APK & sometimes Y Posts: 25,997	Steel over TT __________________

24 June 2017, 11:57 PM	#143
dr.fiddy "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Location: Norway Watch: Sea-D, Sky-D Posts: 134	__________________ AP・Panerai・Rolex

25 June 2017, 04:26 AM	#146
carwash66 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: United States Watch: Rolex/Tudor Posts: 1,411	No contest. Sub C __________________ The Times They Are A-Changin' - Bob Dylan

9 May 2017, 04:55 PM	#122
gwalker "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Gunter Location: AL/NJ Watch: DSSD; 116610LN Posts: 5,509	Sub Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

9 May 2017, 08:32 PM	#124
roadie1 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Southeast Watch: Divers, GMT Posts: 2,144	Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

9 May 2017, 08:38 PM	#125
SpyShops718 Banned Join Date: Jan 2017 Real Name: Steven Demeter Location: New York Watch: Rolex YM2 Gold '08 Posts: 319	BLNR all the way, two-tones are the thing of the past, late 90s-2009 and the only two-tones that are acceptable are the classic or vintage. Also the newer subs are so ugly only the white gold one is ok

10 May 2017, 12:21 AM	#126
shenzenus "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Location: Singapore Posts: 57	If you want to look stunning, Bluesy. Otherwise...

10 May 2017, 12:45 AM	#127
Mirx "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: UK Watch: RLX Posts: 437	BLNR for me too . . .

10 May 2017, 12:57 AM	#129
ny_yeti "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Real Name: Aaron Location: portland, or Watch: 126610LN Posts: 530	Bluesy. Iconic, timeless and classy!

10 May 2017, 03:32 AM	#130
breitlings Banned Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Bethesda Watch: Apple TV Posts: 5,744	Full gold bluesy>blnr = 16710 > two tone bluesy. Imo

10 May 2017, 03:56 AM	#131
Lemieux66 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2016 Real Name: Greg Location: UK Watch: $10 Casio Posts: 521	116613LB. The blue, gold and silver colour scheme works so well. Also I find the bezel handy for timing things during the day.

10 May 2017, 05:21 AM	#133
Pmt2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: USA Posts: 1,145	Blnr would be my choice. The bluesy is more of a weekend watch. It's way too loud. It's beautiful but not for an everyday piece.

10 May 2017, 05:30 AM	#134
Old Geezer "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2015 Location: Earth Watch: 126619LB and more Posts: 5,207	Bluesy. IMO it can be dressed up or down.

10 May 2017, 06:42 AM	#136
BDL 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2016 Location: @ticks_and_sticks Posts: 949	I think in the near future, Gold is coming back in a big way, the Bluesey is starting to become my 100% obsession.

24 June 2017, 07:57 PM	#139
116710er "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Location: 'murica Watch: yer six. Posts: 576	BLNR all the way, no question.

24 June 2017, 10:55 PM	#140
WEST HAM ROLEX "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: London/Asia Watch: GMT LN/SD43/D Blue Posts: 872	BLNR for sure,,,

24 June 2017, 11:00 PM	#141
chfoong "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2016 Location: Malaysia Posts: 71	Bluesy, blnr is not even a close second, just my opinion Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

24 June 2017, 11:27 PM	#142
zjd168 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: US Posts: 2,698	Blnr if only one watch. Bluesy is too flashy in many situations

25 June 2017, 12:32 AM	#144
Canefan1 Banned Join Date: Apr 2017 Location: Homestead Posts: 1,247	IMO not even close. 116613LB

25 June 2017, 01:44 AM	#145
Muzz "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Real Name: Steve Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN Watch: MP 18946 Posts: 7,292	LB for me, all day long. I really like the BLNR but I love the LB. I have said it many times but it can be my one and only very easily.

25 June 2017, 05:38 AM	#147
lig "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: PacNW Watch: Enthusiast Posts: 2,605	I'm allergic to two-tone. BLNR all the way. :)

25 June 2017, 05:55 AM	#148
WS9D "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Real Name: Steve Location: Shasta Watch: es..More Watches! Posts: 2,371	I have a bluesy and a 116710LN. Compared the LN to the BLNR as I was thinking of flipping. In a lot of low light conditions,the BLNR looks almost the same as a LN. So I didn't flip. It's a beautiful watch, just didn't do much for ME in person. My vote is bluesy. It's the only watch anyone ever compliments me on (not that I'm looking for them) outside of an AD or WIS type. Those ppl compliment the Pepsi and D-Blue. A lot of ppl say bluesy is a weekend watch as it's flashy. The reality is, in a world of apple watches, no one really cares but you. If I were to shrink my collection to two pieces, I would keep bluesy and D-blue.

25 June 2017, 06:08 AM	#149
Boaters 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2015 Real Name: Mike Location: Pacific Northwest Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD Posts: 10,649	All super nice but BLNR

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)