The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 27 September 2020, 06:58 AM   #31
mailman
TRF Moderator & DATE-JUST41 2024 Patron
 
mailman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,356
Play nice boys before the thread is closed and infractions are handed out.
__________________
JJ
mailman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 06:59 AM   #32
HarryLime
"TRF" Member
 
HarryLime's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NY
Posts: 676
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laserflorida View Post
I would not trust anyone else at this point with vintage Rolex
I don't have a dog in this fight, but... you wouldn't trust ANYONE else?
HarryLime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 07:01 AM   #33
HarryLime
"TRF" Member
 
HarryLime's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NY
Posts: 676
Quote:
Originally Posted by swish77 View Post
What is still unclear, here or on IG, is whether Michael Morgan disclosed that the GMT was re-lumed when he sold it.

If he disclosed the re-lume when he marketed/sold the watch, he did nothing wrong, regardless of how Stephane advertised the watch when he re-sold it.

If Michael didn't disclose the relume when he marketed/sold the watch, that's really bad, obviously.

Until that part of this story is clarified, I'll reserve judgement.
It seems very clear to me that it was undisclosed. NO ONE thinks there's a problem with selling a relumed watch if it's properly disclosed. This thread wouldn't exist if it was disclosed.
HarryLime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 07:07 AM   #34
watchknut
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 57
As the person that brought all of this light, I can share with you this...

My friend sold the watch to MM with a poorly relumed dial a few months back.

I learned last night from a collector in Asia that his friend was offered the watch in August by MM with an enhanced dial and it was not sold.

MM sold the watch to Stephane with what appears to be a story about the swapped dial.

Stephane sold the watch as original to his client.

I saw the posting online, recognized the watch, found pics from text messages with my buddy who sold to MM and posted on IG after asking Stephane for clarity. He claimed as dial
Swap and that my pics were of a different dial. Not true. My pics show the distinct paint loss from 12-1 and a hashmark at 40. It’s the same dial. I post a follow comparison of the dials proving there was no dial swap.

Today it comes to light that Stephane bought from MM in its current state with a much better relume. He has refunded the buyer and getting the watch returned.

Do we know what was shared or disclosed between those 2? Nope.

Do we know that the watch came to MM in one condition and left his possession in another? Yes.

Someone needs to clear their name here. As there is this story about a swapped dial...yet that cannot be true.

Experienced dealers don’t mess up like this and sweep it under the rug.
watchknut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 07:18 AM   #35
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,887
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchknut View Post
As the person that brought all of this light, I can share with you this...

My friend sold the watch to MM with a poorly relumed dial a few months back.

I learned last night from a collector in Asia that his friend was offered the watch in August by MM with an enhanced dial and it was not sold.

MM sold the watch to Stephane with what appears to be a story about the swapped dial.

Stephane sold the watch as original to his client.

I saw the posting online, recognized the watch, found pics from text messages with my buddy who sold to MM and posted on IG after asking Stephane for clarity. He claimed as dial
Swap and that my pics were of a different dial. Not true. My pics show the distinct paint loss from 12-1 and a hashmark at 40. It’s the same dial. I post a follow comparison of the dials proving there was no dial swap.

Today it comes to light that Stephane bought from MM in its current state with a much better relume. He has refunded the buyer and getting the watch returned.

Do we know what was shared or disclosed between those 2? Nope.

Do we know that the watch came to MM in one condition and left his possession in another? Yes.

Someone needs to clear their name here. As there is this story about a swapped dial...yet that cannot be true.

Experienced dealers don’t mess up like this and sweep it under the rug.
So the watch was basically laundered. I don't have a great opinion about most of these glamour dealers to begin with, but stories like this just reinforce my feelings about how dirty the business is.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 07:31 AM   #36
Juhuatai
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: 5508 & 9401
Posts: 639
So the story is that Michael sold to Stephane as the dial being swapped instead of it being relumed? That's the big sticking point here? The dials are clearly the same. As philip pointed out on watchknut's post on IG, the paint loss at 1 and the hash at 40 are clear indicators of it being one and the same.

I would like to hear Michael's side of the story before I pass judgement. If he clearly disclosed to Stephane that it was a relume then seems to be a problem on Stephane's part. If he didn't then it's on Michael. Either way someone is in the wrong here.
Juhuatai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 07:46 AM   #37
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,887
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juhuatai View Post
Either way someone is in the wrong here.
So you want to know which one will throw the other under the bus. They could both be in the wrong. I doubt anything either one of them says is going to make the situation clear, or make them look good.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 07:47 AM   #38
V.lats97nsx
2024 Pledge Member
 
V.lats97nsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 3,858
John aka Springer has been a great asset to this community. Helped me many times and many guys I know. No reason for the bashing of John.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
V.lats97nsx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 07:54 AM   #39
JParm
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
JParm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NorCal
Watch: Yes!
Posts: 6,554
This has been a crazy thread...I've only heard good things about Morgan, so hope he can come here and speak for himself.
__________________
JParm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 07:58 AM   #40
Juhuatai
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: 5508 & 9401
Posts: 639
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan S View Post
So you want to know which one will throw the other under the bus. They could both be in the wrong. I doubt anything either one of them says is going to make the situation clear, or make them look good.
I just want to know the truth behind this situation. I’ve never heard of Stephane but Michael is one of the most respected in the business. Surely it’s not unreasonable to expect Michael to address this situation and hear his side of the story. He’s pretty active on TRF.
Juhuatai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 08:10 AM   #41
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryLime View Post
This thread wouldn't exist if it was disclosed.
The question is WHO didn’t disclose what? Michael is being accused of something we don’t know is a fact. Maybe he did disclose to all parties he had the dial relumed. Maybe not. We need to hear his side of the story.

Quote:
Originally Posted by watchknut View Post
Today it comes to light that Stephane bought from MM in its current state with a much better relume.

Do we know what was shared or disclosed between those 2? Nope.
This is the key. We don’t know.
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 08:11 AM   #42
jjfesq
"TRF" Member
 
jjfesq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: NY
Watch: 116618 LB smurf
Posts: 154
You people have too much time on your hands.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jjfesq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 08:15 AM   #43
swaini3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Mo
Location: Dubai
Watch: 1675 GMT, DRSD
Posts: 1,432
Interesting thread..... Im curious to know how the watch was sold to its last buyer from Stephane as "all original".....
swaini3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 08:18 AM   #44
swaini3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Mo
Location: Dubai
Watch: 1675 GMT, DRSD
Posts: 1,432
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjfesq View Post
You people have too much time on your hands.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Really?? I would love to see your reaction if you paid top $$ for something and then realised it was fake /messed with / not original :)
swaini3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 08:22 AM   #45
SubKing
"TRF" Member
 
SubKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Watch: where do i start??
Posts: 3,254
Quote:
Originally Posted by V.lats97nsx View Post
John aka Springer has been a great asset to this community. Helped me many times and many guys I know. No reason for the bashing of John.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So that makes it ok for John to bash others constantly? He doesn’t need others to fight his fights.. John needs to learn some manors and to stop bashing dealers and bashing people. You think it’s right he sends me an unsolicited message out of no where bashing dealers and being condescending to me for no reason?
SubKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 08:38 AM   #46
Kingface66
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kingface66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: 1966 Rolex 5513
Posts: 3,414
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjfesq View Post
You people have too much time on your hands.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The irony of you commenting on here isn’t lost.
Kingface66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 08:48 AM   #47
330ci
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: michigan
Posts: 2,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by SubKing View Post
So that makes it ok for John to bash others constantly? He doesn’t need others to fight his fights.. John needs to learn some manors and to stop bashing dealers and bashing people. You think it’s right he sends me an unsolicited message out of no where bashing dealers and being condescending to me for no reason?
nope, but moderators have already weighed in and the rest of this thread is pretty interesting so in the best interest of everyone I think it's best just to drop it and report him in the future if you feel you're personally being harassed and let the mods deal with it. no need to drag it out for the peanut gallery.

interested to see what information turns up about this, would be sad to find out MM tried passing this off.
330ci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 09:17 AM   #48
jjfesq
"TRF" Member
 
jjfesq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: NY
Watch: 116618 LB smurf
Posts: 154
Quote:
Originally Posted by swaini3 View Post
Really?? I would love to see your reaction if you paid top $$ for something and then realised it was fake /messed with / not original :)

Caveat Emptor.
Buy the seller not the watch.
A good seller would take the watch back no questions asked.
Unless you really know what you’re doing don’t buy investment grade vintage, Good chance you’re going to get burned.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jjfesq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 09:31 AM   #49
swaini3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Mo
Location: Dubai
Watch: 1675 GMT, DRSD
Posts: 1,432
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjfesq View Post
Caveat Emptor.
Buy the seller not the watch.
A good seller would take the watch back no questions asked.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
emmmm, I dont think you've read the story... They are both known sellers :) and honestly, no its not just a matter of taking the watch back....
swaini3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 09:48 AM   #50
btinl
2024 Pledge Member
 
btinl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: .
Watch: on my wrist
Posts: 1,942
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchknut View Post
As the person that brought all of this light, I can share with you this...

My friend sold the watch to MM with a poorly relumed dial a few months back.

I learned last night from a collector in Asia that his friend was offered the watch in August by MM with an enhanced dial and it was not sold.

MM sold the watch to Stephane with what appears to be a story about the swapped dial.

Stephane sold the watch as original to his client.

I saw the posting online, recognized the watch, found pics from text messages with my buddy who sold to MM and posted on IG after asking Stephane for clarity. He claimed as dial
Swap and that my pics were of a different dial. Not true. My pics show the distinct paint loss from 12-1 and a hashmark at 40. It’s the same dial. I post a follow comparison of the dials proving there was no dial swap.

Today it comes to light that Stephane bought from MM in its current state with a much better relume. He has refunded the buyer and getting the watch returned.

Do we know what was shared or disclosed between those 2? Nope.

Do we know that the watch came to MM in one condition and left his possession in another? Yes.

Someone needs to clear their name here. As there is this story about a swapped dial...yet that cannot be true.

Experienced dealers don’t mess up like this and sweep it under the rug.
What happened to all the IG posts?
btinl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 10:18 AM   #51
watchknut
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 57
I archived them.

I did my part and alerted the community, and helped save a collector from getting a watch with issues.

I didn’t like them in my feed...too much negativity.
watchknut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 10:29 AM   #52
Pitbos
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Toronto
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchknut View Post
I archived them.

I did my part and alerted the community, and helped save a collector from getting a watch with issues.

I didn’t like them in my feed...too much negativity.

I think you did a great thing by putting it all out there. But it’s much much bigger than just this one sale. If M Morgan and other very well known dealers misrepresented this 1675, then it stands to reason that every watch they’ve ever sold could come under scrutiny and be suspect. I hope lawyers didn’t get involved in this behind the scenes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Pitbos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 10:44 AM   #53
SubKing
"TRF" Member
 
SubKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Watch: where do i start??
Posts: 3,254
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchknut View Post
I archived them.

I did my part and alerted the community, and helped save a collector from getting a watch with issues.

I didn’t like them in my feed...too much negativity.
I can understand that and think you did the right thing all the way around.

Hopefully MM will address this and clear it up.. Hopefully.
Because I have always thought very highly of him.

Thank you for your keen eye on all of this. You saved someone a lot of financial pain.
SubKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 10:58 AM   #54
jjfesq
"TRF" Member
 
jjfesq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: NY
Watch: 116618 LB smurf
Posts: 154
Quote:
Originally Posted by swaini3 View Post
emmmm, I dont think you've read the story... They are both known sellers :) and honestly, no its not just a matter of taking the watch back....

Yeah it is that simple. Your word is the most important thing you have in life.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jjfesq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 11:47 AM   #55
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,887
Quote:
Originally Posted by swaini3 View Post
emmmm, I dont think you've read the story... They are both known sellers :) and honestly, no its not just a matter of taking the watch back....
Agreed, taking back the watch just because they got caught is better than denying it and not taking the watch back, but it doesn't really address the main issues of integrity and trust. Apparently, this was not just an innocent mistake.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 12:41 PM   #56
BrazenC5
2024 Pledge Member
 
BrazenC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: 1665,1675,1680,SD4
Posts: 1,837
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjfesq View Post
Yeah it is that simple. Your word is the most important thing you have in life.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's only half according to Tony Montana.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
BrazenC5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 02:55 PM   #57
phillip ridley
2024 Pledge Member
 
phillip ridley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Watch: 1971 Rolex Red Sub
Posts: 547
Quote:
Originally Posted by SubKing View Post
Right now the attention is surprisingly on Michael Morgan who is a member here. I am really very shocked by all of this revolving around worldly watches and MM.. On the flip side, in the past, I have been mislead by a very known dealer and sold something to find out the hands were relumed. It was ultimately taken care of. I think the most important thing here is the buyer of this watch is getting his money back. I think we would all be surprised at what goes on in some circles of “elite collectors and dealers” trust takes years to build and only seconds to break. Such a shame and makes this even more scary for our hobby
Unfortunately, you are correct about some of the "elite dealers" and even more so that it takes many years to build a foundation which can be devastated by one incident, ( Your word is everything).

I also feel the growing lack of interest in buying vintage Rolex's due to situations like this and how the enjoyment is no longer there. This community is small and even so with ones who are willing to purchase watches of this value. Ultimately, this will have an impact on the prices in which collectors pay, IMO.
__________________
phillip@ridleywatchmakers.com
phillip ridley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 06:46 PM   #58
Wahlberg
"TRF" Member
 
Wahlberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Paris
Posts: 3,530
I really wonder what's going on in the vintage market. Seems like a lof of vintage watches are being touched up the past few years to get that extra grand or few grands (or even more) out of the watch.

Correct me if I'm wrong, I'm sure a lot has been going on for decades now but the past few years it's more noticeable? Re-cutting cases, polishing (and overpolishing of new watches as well), re-luming, .... but all at a high(er) level. People have become really skilled at this so if you are able to pull it off and you want to walk that line, you could get away with it. Same with tropical dials and people altering it. That's how you get rich.
Wahlberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 11:20 PM   #59
linesiders
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
linesiders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,420
Reserving judgement until more info is out.

Buying the seller is not always the safe bet. There are some excellent sellers that miss things and some (most) that embellish and some spin tales.
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg!
linesiders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2020, 11:40 PM   #60
harry in montreal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
What was the asking price of this 1675? I’m just trying to understand the damage monetarily.

I do find it fascinating that everyone here is ok with a relume, so long as it is ‘disclosed’. It’s not okay, because as it filters through the relume absolutely will not get disclosed. The reality is that there is another 1675 with a piece of shite dial floating around that looks great to most people. Damage done
harry in montreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
iconic watch company , michael morgan


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.