ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
1 February 2012, 03:00 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,347
|
This thread rocks.
I haven't laughed so hard in a long time. Love the responses.
__________________
"Appreciate your life!" |
1 February 2012, 11:32 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: anywhere but here
Posts: 690
|
Man, i thought it was a bottle opener at first!
|
2 February 2012, 11:43 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: toronto
Watch: DJ II
Posts: 327
|
By far the ugliest watch I've ever seen..... Im not a fan of that brand at all....
|
13 February 2012, 08:54 AM | #4 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: John
Location: ɹǝpun
Watch: and learn
Posts: 2,985
|
Let me be the FIRST TO SAY, I LOVE IT.........................
Actually, I hate it and just did a little vomit in my own mouth, but I just wanted to be the first to SAY I love it...
__________________
Obey Gravity, it's the Law! ROLEX --- SEIKO --- HEUER TRF REHAUT T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M |
13 February 2012, 09:07 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Hamilton, MI USA
Watch: My beloved TT DJ
Posts: 3,831
|
Its supposed allure is lost on me!
__________________
My Trusty TT DJ |
13 February 2012, 10:14 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: brazil
Watch: Rolex GMTII C
Posts: 42
|
Amazingly ugly! What a shame!
|
28 February 2012, 11:55 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Ny
Watch: Explorer ii 42mm
Posts: 219
|
That is brutal. But at least it protects your wrist from dangerous uv rays much like their sunglasses do.
|
28 February 2012, 03:34 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,385
|
Not even if you payed me $9,000
|
21 December 2012, 02:50 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brooklyn ny
Watch: Rolex sub
Posts: 504
|
Will be on Shop nbc 2013 christmas watch blowout for 4 flex payments of 149.99 free christmas delivery....garbage.
|
21 December 2012, 04:41 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Southern CA.
Watch: JLC~AP~RLX~PAM~UN
Posts: 360
|
|
29 February 2012, 05:21 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Donald
Location: Texas
Watch: Sub5513 / Choc1675
Posts: 826
|
$89.95 and a free case. Okay, Deal.
__________________
'66 5513 Meters First | '77 1675 Chocolate | '85 DateJust 2-Tone | Omega Planet Ocean Chrono XL Orange | 1978 Omega Speedmaster 1st Walk on the Moon |
29 February 2012, 05:57 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Bob
Location: Dallas, Texas
Watch: Daytona Meteorite
Posts: 3,413
|
that's a stinker.
__________________
meteor flying to Earth onto my wrist... 116509 Daytona Meteorite, 116520 Daytona Black, 116710 GMTIIC, 16013 DATEJUST, CARTIER SANTOS 100 W20090X8, IWC Big Pilot, IWC Top Gun "Everything works out in the end. If it hasn't worked out, it's not the end." |
29 February 2012, 01:35 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Henry
Location: GA
Posts: 617
|
I think my G-Shock looks better and for less money
|
22 June 2012, 05:03 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Bob
Location: Dallas, Texas
Watch: Daytona Meteorite
Posts: 3,413
|
__________________
meteor flying to Earth onto my wrist... 116509 Daytona Meteorite, 116520 Daytona Black, 116710 GMTIIC, 16013 DATEJUST, CARTIER SANTOS 100 W20090X8, IWC Big Pilot, IWC Top Gun "Everything works out in the end. If it hasn't worked out, it's not the end." |
24 March 2012, 05:18 PM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Long Island N.Y.
Posts: 55
|
I would not give 9 cents for that ugly piece of crap. If someone gave me 9k to wear the watch, along with the watch for free, I still wound not wear it. That thing is f-cking horrible looking.
|
24 March 2012, 05:53 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: the girls
Posts: 7,095
|
One of the ugliest watch ever seen
__________________
Best George "Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston --------------------- *new*https://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE *new * http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ IG @passionata1 |
24 March 2012, 09:00 PM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: WA
Watch: All the Oysters
Posts: 811
|
I just ralphed in my mouth a bit....
|
10 May 2012, 05:44 PM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: OC, CA
Posts: 5,672
|
Looks good if it's only $500.
|
13 May 2012, 04:19 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Paul
Location: UK, Dorset
Watch: and learn
Posts: 2,631
|
Perhap Rolex should start selling sunglasses!!!
I did check the dateto see if it was the 1st of april
__________________
Rolex Sub 1680, Rolex GMT 116710LN, Rolex Datejust 16220 Salmon Dial (the Mrs), Tudor BB58, Tudor Pelagos Blue and Several Seiko's ************************************************** ***************** "last one in the chopper is a rotten egg" Jonathan Quayle Higgins III |
21 June 2012, 04:59 AM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: uk
Posts: 33
|
I just couldnt wear that..how on earth could they justify the price..
|
21 June 2012, 04:34 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Watch: ing you...
Posts: 3,775
|
if it was in rose gold and had a clear case back I would think about it...
Nah I'm just playin
__________________
'I am easily satisfied with the very best' - Winston Churchill |
22 June 2012, 12:49 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Melbourne
Watch: 16610, Tudor 1960
Posts: 1,554
|
Royal Oakley (please get this thing) Offshore...
|
24 June 2012, 04:28 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 2
|
not nice at all. and waaay overpriced
|
16 July 2012, 12:35 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16520/14060/116200
Posts: 32
|
Only thing that comes to mind is: WHY?
|
16 July 2012, 11:28 PM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2005
Real Name: ACCT CLOSED
Location: -
Posts: 1,497
|
For that $ I'd be looking at something a little classier, like a JLC...
|
17 July 2012, 12:05 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Netherlands
Watch: Rolex 14060M
Posts: 37
|
But they do make some sweet Watch cases, of watch vaults :)
|
17 July 2012, 06:18 AM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Mark-O!
Location: Arlington, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 12,714
|
The Oakley website says it's COSC, but then further down it says accuracy of +/- 12 seconds a day. Did COSC standards change???
|
17 July 2012, 10:45 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Craig
Location: Seattle-ish, USA
Watch: GMTIIc, AK, LVc
Posts: 7,022
|
Older post. But it's nice to see that ugly is still ugly.
I'm guessing they modeled this fine specimen after someone's stylish can opener. Just saying. |
19 July 2012, 02:26 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Steve
Location: San Angelo, TX
Watch: Rlx,Omega,JLC,Breg
Posts: 1,699
|
Ugh, and with the valjoux movement you know they just slapped it in the case and put the brand name on it. Who's gonna pay that much for something that they basically just pieced together from other sources?
|
3 August 2012, 07:34 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: ontario
Posts: 87
|
way way overrated!!!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.