ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Tri-National-Man · 25 March 2018, 09:45 PM

I reckon this is fake, seller says usual "given to me as a gift"..
What do you guys reckon??
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Rolex-Sub...0AAOSwWxNas~om

jhvalente · 25 March 2018, 10:24 PM

Must have just updated it. Doesn’t say anything about a gift but now he’s thinning his collection.

JayB · 25 March 2018, 10:53 PM

It's either fake or a really poor example of workmanship.

I'd say fake.

This seller has also only sold 2 other items before, 1 being a ladies Rolex Oyster Perpetual Date which I also believe to be fake.

JayB · 25 March 2018, 11:00 PM

Also big red flag for me, while the actual items are private in the last month looking at feedback he's received he has made at least 2 purchases from sellers who sell boxes, hang tags etc.

No looking good to me

antrolexsub · 26 March 2018, 12:13 AM

It’s junk. Not even close.

Tri-National-Man · 26 March 2018, 02:31 AM

Bezel pip looks wrong..Coronet at 12 looks too far away from triangular marker, hour plots look wrong...And wrong box for a 2016 sub 114060..

CaveDweller · 26 March 2018, 03:07 AM

The booklet that says "Submariner Date" is a bit of a give-away ......

GLADIATOR · 26 March 2018, 04:52 AM

Reported

Tri-National-Man · 26 March 2018, 05:59 AM

Just noticed the wrong type of diver’s extension link in the clasp in photo#3..That’s a DeepSea type one..

crowncollection · 26 March 2018, 07:30 AM

Reported

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

eelpie · 26 March 2018, 09:03 PM

. . . the seller is a liar.

On the lady's Date he recently sold, he says, "Solid white gold bezel surrounds the face with further white gold traveling down centre links with stainless steel on the outer links and main case."

The bracelet is not steel and white gold.

It's all steel, and his description was misleading, i.e., not true.

PRSWILL · 27 March 2018, 04:12 AM

Reported- it's still up tho.

Valenciawatchrepair · 27 March 2018, 05:18 AM

Garbage

sourdough · 9 April 2018, 11:37 AM

reported

Bello_nyc · 9 April 2018, 02:14 PM

Lol

Imad Dababneh · 16 April 2018, 10:16 PM

I agree with all above, the manual say "submariner date", while the watch is no date model, the stamp looks fake from the poor threads on it, there is a seem between the Rolex logo "crown" and the clasp "the logo should be part of the clasp not glued to it", and I think the most obvious one is the central second hand which should cover part of the second indices, in this case it is shorter! also the text 300m, there should be a space between the 300 and m but I am not sure of such remarks whether it is true for all models or not. With all that said the seller managed to get a 4250 Pounds with 8 bidders competing for a possible fake watch!!!

25 March 2018, 09:45 PM	#1
Tri-National-Man "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Shaun Location: Devonshire Watch: SubND/D/LV Posts: 648	Fake Sub 114060? I reckon this is fake, seller says usual "given to me as a gift".. What do you guys reckon?? https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Rolex-Sub...0AAOSwWxNas~om

25 March 2018, 11:00 PM	#4
JayB "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: UK Watch: EXP, DJ, NF Posts: 710	Also big red flag for me, while the actual items are private in the last month looking at feedback he's received he has made at least 2 purchases from sellers who sell boxes, hang tags etc. No looking good to me __________________ In 1953 they used Rolex Oysters and oxygen on Everest. In 1978 they managed without the oxygen. Rolex Explorer -- Rolex Datejust -- Tudor North Flag -- Omega De Ville Trésor -- Tudor Black Bay GMT -- Omega Speedmaster Professional -- Tudor Black Bay Fifty Eight

26 March 2018, 04:52 AM	#8
GLADIATOR "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Adam Location: Costa Blanca, Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA Posts: 5,288	Reported __________________ The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill "We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."

26 March 2018, 07:30 AM	#10
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,157	Reported Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ watches many

26 March 2018, 09:03 PM	#11
eelpie "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: USA Watch: 15223, 6305/2 Posts: 583	At best . . . . . . the seller is a liar. On the lady's Date he recently sold, he says, "Solid white gold bezel surrounds the face with further white gold traveling down centre links with stainless steel on the outer links and main case." The bracelet is not steel and white gold. It's all steel, and his description was misleading, i.e., not true.

25 March 2018, 10:24 PM	#2
jhvalente "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Mi Watch: 18038,16800, 16233 Posts: 70	Must have just updated it. Doesn’t say anything about a gift but now he’s thinning his collection.

25 March 2018, 10:53 PM	#3
JayB "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: UK Watch: EXP, DJ, NF Posts: 710	It's either fake or a really poor example of workmanship. I'd say fake. This seller has also only sold 2 other items before, 1 being a ladies Rolex Oyster Perpetual Date which I also believe to be fake. __________________ In 1953 they used Rolex Oysters and oxygen on Everest. In 1978 they managed without the oxygen. Rolex Explorer -- Rolex Datejust -- Tudor North Flag -- Omega De Ville Trésor -- Tudor Black Bay GMT -- Omega Speedmaster Professional -- Tudor Black Bay Fifty Eight

26 March 2018, 12:13 AM	#5
antrolexsub "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: Earth Posts: 758	It’s junk. Not even close.

26 March 2018, 02:31 AM	#6
Tri-National-Man "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Shaun Location: Devonshire Watch: SubND/D/LV Posts: 648	Bezel pip looks wrong..Coronet at 12 looks too far away from triangular marker, hour plots look wrong...And wrong box for a 2016 sub 114060..

26 March 2018, 03:07 AM	#7
CaveDweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2017 Location: Gogland Watch: Timex Posts: 267	The booklet that says "Submariner Date" is a bit of a give-away ......

26 March 2018, 05:59 AM	#9
Tri-National-Man "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Shaun Location: Devonshire Watch: SubND/D/LV Posts: 648	Just noticed the wrong type of diver’s extension link in the clasp in photo#3..That’s a DeepSea type one..

27 March 2018, 04:12 AM	#12
PRSWILL "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Location: Minnesota Posts: 246	Reported- it's still up tho.

27 March 2018, 05:18 AM	#13
Valenciawatchrepair Banned Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: Ellijay, GA Posts: 1,504	Garbage

9 April 2018, 11:37 AM	#14
sourdough Banned Join Date: Apr 2018 Real Name: JP Location: Vietnam Watch: 116610LN, 16610LV Posts: 25	reported

9 April 2018, 02:14 PM	#15
Bello_nyc "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Real Name: Bello Location: NYC Watch: Rolex Posts: 698	Lol __________________ Ap Royal oak offshore 🌹 ♛ Sky-Dweller 326934🤍 ♛ Datejust41 126333 ♛ Datejust2 116334 💎💎

16 April 2018, 10:16 PM	#16
Imad Dababneh "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2018 Location: Jordan Posts: 2	I agree with all above, the manual say "submariner date", while the watch is no date model, the stamp looks fake from the poor threads on it, there is a seem between the Rolex logo "crown" and the clasp "the logo should be part of the clasp not glued to it", and I think the most obvious one is the central second hand which should cover part of the second indices, in this case it is shorter! also the text 300m, there should be a space between the 300 and m but I am not sure of such remarks whether it is true for all models or not. With all that said the seller managed to get a 4250 Pounds with 8 bidders competing for a possible fake watch!!!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)