ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 March 2009, 07:07 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Jason
Location: AZ, USA
Watch: Sea Dweller M
Posts: 386
|
Sea Dweller repair/service question
To all who can answer this -
Just wondering if the relief valve adds a little more complexity to the maintenance/repair of the watch and what parts if any get replaced on a service. How many parts does it consist of? And, last one have you seen any go bad? Thanks!
__________________
Sea Dweller M SS Sub Date - gone but not forgotten Member NYLON NATION! #12188 |
11 March 2009, 08:25 AM | #2 | |
TechXpert & 2016 Patron
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mx
Posts: 1,572
|
Quote:
__________________
Member# 5731 Instagram: @vanessa.cw21 Watch my Rolex repair video: https://youtu.be/jDnaotCTpTA |
|
11 March 2009, 08:30 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Jason
Location: AZ, USA
Watch: Sea Dweller M
Posts: 386
|
Thanks for the quick reply Vanessa. Shoot I was hoping to use you as my local watchmaker :( Maybe someone else will chime in. Or I guess I will have to get another watch :) Oh the madness!
__________________
Sea Dweller M SS Sub Date - gone but not forgotten Member NYLON NATION! #12188 |
11 March 2009, 10:39 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
|
From what I know, the pressure test chamber for the SD is different than that off the one's used on the Submariners.
Also, on routine servicing, SD costs more to service due to the added gaskets (also thicker) used, thicker crystals etc. I would definitely bring it back to RSC esp for an SD to ensure quality work. I would.
__________________
I'm just a cook... |
14 April 2009, 01:50 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Phillip
Location: Alabama
Watch: Triple 6 SD
Posts: 1,720
|
Yes my AD had to send my sea dweller into the RSC to pressure test it. The Helium escape valve is quite simple but not everyone can test to 4000 ft. If you have a deep sea I guess you can forget anyone except Rolex doing that service.
__________________
It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye. - Antoine de Saint Exupéry |
15 April 2009, 09:58 PM | #6 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,855
|
Quote:
What equipment do you use to pressure test the Rolex watches you work on and what is the maximum test pressure you can achieve. regards, Eddie.
__________________
E |
|
16 April 2009, 01:59 AM | #7 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Dal
Location: Seattle
Watch: 168000
Posts: 1,614
|
SD's are tough to service, but not the movement. That's a piece of cake. My watchmaker friend, who's worked for Rolex for over 30 years can service SD's but parts are exchange only. The only thing that i cannot do for an SD is replace the crystal. I have to take mine apart and fool around with it some more, of course I better have some money in hand in case it needs to go to Rolex for an emergency crystal replacement.
|
16 April 2009, 04:33 AM | #8 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Rolex world
Watch: SS/W Skydweller
Posts: 527
|
As Vanessa has already said, since Rolex are the only ones capable of correctly/fully pressure testing Submariners/Sea Dwellers and Deepseas to their maximum depth, they are the only ones able to service them and Guarrantee their waterproof integrity.
I know there are plenty of watchmakers/owners out there who open them but you can never be sure of the watches waterproof unless it can be properly/fully tested. |
16 April 2009, 05:18 AM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
|
__________________
Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution! |
16 April 2009, 07:25 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: New York
Watch: too many
Posts: 705
|
Not much to it.
|
17 April 2009, 08:01 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Jason
Location: AZ, USA
Watch: Sea Dweller M
Posts: 386
|
Thanks for the picture that is great! I certainly appreciate it.
__________________
Sea Dweller M SS Sub Date - gone but not forgotten Member NYLON NATION! #12188 |
23 May 2009, 02:59 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Douglas
Location: nassau, bahamas
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 33
|
thanks for the great close-up. surprising how simple it is, yet so effective.
|
10 July 2009, 10:03 PM | #13 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rik Dietel
Location: Seminole Fla
Watch: 5512 s/s Sub
Posts: 1,818
|
The testing equipment for the sea dweller cost about 3200 for the Lititz Machine capable of 125 Bar or 4125 feet the other is the Roxer Natador about 6700 dollars which tests to the same depth the latter is what Rolex prefers.
|
16 December 2009, 02:21 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: Mountains
Watch: ALS, AP, PP, Rolex
Posts: 2,900
|
Rikki,
Do you have a Lititz or Roxer for testing SDs you service? |
20 December 2009, 06:40 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 440
|
I saw this old post just this morning and understand that you might not have the proper depth testing equipment to test for 1000 meters on a SD but, if you worked on the movement or regulated a SD, couldn't you still test it to the same 300M spec as a Sub?
__________________
Regards, Ray K. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.