The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 November 2019, 07:00 AM   #1
ericmeds
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: NYC
Watch: Rolex/AP
Posts: 26
Royal Oak VS Nautilus

Royal Oak 15500 MSRP 19.2 - trades for 24.8k
Nautilus 5711 MSRP 30.6 - trades for 68k

Seems like Royal Oaks is massively undervalued - What do you guys think?

For starters the RO clasp is far better than 5711 although the 5740 has a much improved one so that may be next. Overall seems like RO is more or less on par with a Nautilus besides that hairspring (and maybe some finishing details?). I suppose Patek does a better job at restricting supply, but less familiar with the other nuances in the current market.

Are APs next?
ericmeds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2019, 08:46 AM   #2
pyceasyas123
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Toronto
Posts: 68
I’d sooner compare the 15202 vs 5711 pricing instead of the 15500 pricing. A 15202 is going for ~40k now, I believe retail is around 24k? This is already quite a bit over retail.

The 5711 pricing is just crazy right now. Not sure if this is going to sustain itself. You could find pateks sitting in showcases 5 years ago. There’s a lot of hype in the watch market right now across Rolex, AP and Patek.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
pyceasyas123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2019, 09:53 AM   #3
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,220
If you truly like the 500 then now is the time to buy, wait times at ADs are still in the months and so are reasonable, grey prices too. Don't buy for any other reason, trying to make money now is very risky.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2019, 10:06 AM   #4
Token74
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,707
I prefer the RO to the AP. Buy AP now!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count.

Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune
Token74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2019, 10:50 AM   #5
Peterandwatches
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: WA
Watch: 5167/15400/Sub/JLC
Posts: 1,023
It all depends when you get in. Wasn't the 15400 trading at 12K a few years ago?
Peterandwatches is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2019, 02:38 PM   #6
singe89
"TRF" Member
 
singe89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: Orange County, CA
Watch: Rolex, AP & Patek
Posts: 3,722
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peterandwatches View Post
It all depends when you get in. Wasn't the 15400 trading at 12K a few years ago?
New around $10k 6 years ago
singe89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2019, 03:09 PM   #7
texasmade
"TRF" Member
 
texasmade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Lone Star State
Watch: AP RO 15400, FOIS
Posts: 2,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peterandwatches View Post
It all depends when you get in. Wasn't the 15400 trading at 12K a few years ago?
Yep. I got mine for just over $13k about 3 years ago. I also remember going to the AP boutique in NYC a month after getting my RO and seeing a blue 15400, 15203 open work in RG, and a blue dial RO chrono all for sale.
texasmade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2019, 06:23 PM   #8
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
I wouldn't say AP is undervalued, I'd say Patek is extremely overvalued.

The 5711 Nautilus is no-where near a 60K watch.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2019, 09:25 PM   #9
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by bayerische View Post
I wouldn't say AP is undervalued, I'd say Patek is extremely overvalued.

The 5711 Nautilus is no-where near a 60K watch.
Yup in the UK its more like $80K.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2019, 09:26 PM   #10
KennyS
"TRF" Member
 
KennyS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 36
The 5711 Nautilus is no-where near a 60K watch -
I won't pay 5711 for even $35,000
Prefer Rolex Daytona / GMT
KennyS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2019, 09:41 PM   #11
PPFANBOY
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 324
Nautilus is the hype watch of the day and even that has taken a beating in value. Lot of people having a hilarious cry about it. It's a classic therefore worthy in any collection and a nice watch for what is, a basic steel watch that literally ripped off the RO... And compare any Nautilus with the latest ROs. No comparison. The AP RO PC Ceramic openwork puts every single Nautilus in its pocket for example.

This is coming for someone who is actually a Nautilus fan, but facts are facts too.
__________________
PP, AP, VC, RM, FPJ, GF, GS, ALS, JLC, GO, Breitling, Zenith, Bulgari, Rolex, Tudor
PPFANBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2019, 10:45 PM   #12
0315
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 105
The only allowable counterpart to 5711 is 15202.
I don't see a 15500 close to that.
If you had the chance to wear a 15202 you would most likely agree.
IMHO, the proportions of 15500 are off. I had watches even up to panerai and big pilot. Huge watches. But they made sense.
At the moment I see a trend going back to smaller sizes. At least on myself. APs 41mm are simply to big.
I would even consider a 38mm AP right now, which still feels same size as for instance Skydweller.
Given the thinner housing, I see the 15202 as the most perfect balanced watch at AP today.
In terms of comfort,FAR BETTER than the other models.
But as usual, everyone has his own cup of tea

Cheers
0315 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2019, 12:35 AM   #13
Vipes
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by 0315 View Post
The only allowable counterpart to 5711 is 15202.
I don't see a 15500 close to that.
If you had the chance to wear a 15202 you would most likely agree.
IMHO, the proportions of 15500 are off. I had watches even up to panerai and big pilot. Huge watches. But they made sense.
At the moment I see a trend going back to smaller sizes. At least on myself. APs 41mm are simply to big.
I would even consider a 38mm AP right now, which still feels same size as for instance Skydweller.
Given the thinner housing, I see the 15202 as the most perfect balanced watch at AP today.
In terms of comfort,FAR BETTER than the other models.
But as usual, everyone has his own cup of tea

Cheers
Well stated. 15300, 15400, and 15500 are all really nice APs. The 15202 is truly the iconic AP.
Vipes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2019, 02:14 AM   #14
pyceasyas123
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Toronto
Posts: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by bayerische View Post
I wouldn't say AP is undervalued, I'd say Patek is extremely overvalued.

The 5711 Nautilus is no-where near a 60K watch.


Agree with this big time. It’s a nice watch but nowhere near 60k. Plenty of other options available at that price point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
pyceasyas123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2019, 02:20 AM   #15
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
I had a new RO 39mm for about a week and did not bond with it. And when I was going to buy a 5711 5 or so years ago, which was in the counter, the wife said it looked like a TV screen and persuaded me not to buy. I bought a Platinum Daytona instead, which she loved.
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2019, 05:58 AM   #16
ericmeds
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: NYC
Watch: Rolex/AP
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by 0315 View Post
The only allowable counterpart to 5711 is 15202.
I don't see a 15500 close to that.
If you had the chance to wear a 15202 you would most likely agree.
IMHO, the proportions of 15500 are off. I had watches even up to panerai and big pilot. Huge watches. But they made sense.
At the moment I see a trend going back to smaller sizes. At least on myself. APs 41mm are simply to big.
I would even consider a 38mm AP right now, which still feels same size as for instance Skydweller.
Given the thinner housing, I see the 15202 as the most perfect balanced watch at AP today.
In terms of comfort,FAR BETTER than the other models.
But as usual, everyone has his own cup of tea

Cheers
What size wrist? My 15500 looks great on 7" wrist but I do agree the trend might be going down in size.
ericmeds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2019, 08:42 AM   #17
SMD
"TRF" Member
 
SMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,660
The answer is obviously both.
SMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2019, 08:49 AM   #18
lukey77
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: london
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by 0315 View Post
The only allowable counterpart to 5711 is 15202.
I don't see a 15500 close to that.
If you had the chance to wear a 15202 you would most likely agree.
IMHO, the proportions of 15500 are off. I had watches even up to panerai and big pilot. Huge watches. But they made sense.
At the moment I see a trend going back to smaller sizes. At least on myself. APs 41mm are simply to big.
I would even consider a 38mm AP right now, which still feels same size as for instance Skydweller.
Given the thinner housing, I see the 15202 as the most perfect balanced watch at AP today.
In terms of comfort,FAR BETTER than the other models.
But as usual, everyone has his own cup of tea

Cheers


The 15202 is strange. I completely agree- until you’ve worn it I don’t think you can really appreciate it. I have a 5712 , Rolexes , a Royal Oak offshore etc.
My wife hates my watch addiction. But the one watch she will not let me sell , the one watch that she absolutely loves, is the 15202. It doesn’t have a seconds hand, it’s not fancy - but it’s just unbelievably well proportioned, the bracelet is unbelievably well made , and that blue!

It’s a strange one- but I genuinely think the 15202 is perfection.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
lukey77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2019, 11:04 PM   #19
Frits1980
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: N/A
Posts: 600
Anyone with an average wrist can wear the Nautilus. The 15400/15500 is just to big for most. I have the 15400 and 7+ wrists, i love it but i only wear it with t-shirts to balance the size as it looks even bigger with sleeves. I will flip mine for a 15202 someday. Wish they made 15500 a 40mm.
Frits1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2019, 12:15 AM   #20
karasus
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: N/A
Watch: Royal Oak
Posts: 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frits1980 View Post
Anyone with an average wrist can wear the Nautilus. The 15400/15500 is just to big for most. I have the 15400 and 7+ wrists, i love it but i only wear it with t-shirts to balance the size as it looks even bigger with sleeves. I will flip mine for a 15202 someday. Wish they made 15500 a 40mm.
There was an interesting article a while back about wrist sizes. The average, more exactly median, wrist size is 7.25inches / 18.42cm. https://theslenderwrist.com/average-...ize-for-a-man/

From the article, you can see that 60% of men have a wrist size between 6.75 in/17.5cm and 7.75 in / 19.67cm. At that size anything from 39mm-42mm should be wearable without overhang. So any 15202,15300,15400,15500, 5711, and even a 42mm ROO should fit 60% of male wrists. Of course a 7.75 would wear a 42mm watch slightly better but a 41mm watch is still wearable without overhang on a 6.75mm wrist. There is also some preference in play for watch to wrist size but in terms of fit 39mm-42mm is the sweet spot.

That said, the bell curve in the study is a bit more bottom heavy rather than top heavy, meaning that it is more common to have a smaller wrist than Arnold level wrists, which represent more of the extremes.

If we consider watches that are on the lower end of 39mm-42mm spectrum (39mm-40mm) have the benefit of fitting both people in the "normal" range and also a larger proportion of the "below normal" wrist sizes. Then 39mm-40mm 15202/15300/5711 can fit wrists from from 6 inches to 7.75 then 80% of male wrists can wear it, based on the sample taken from the survey.

Of course things like wrist shape (flat vs round) and preference/trends also play a role in what you might want to wear, so don't take these things as a hard rule.

Also, it should be taken into consideration that today the median age of watch buyer of AP and Pateks is around 40-44. Younger generations that are future buyers are bigger and taller, which result in bigger wrists, so most likely in 15 years a 41mm 15400/15500 will be conservative in size.
karasus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2019, 09:31 AM   #21
dcash0615
2024 Pledge Member
 
dcash0615's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: CA
Watch: es
Posts: 4,362
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericmeds View Post
Royal Oak 15500 MSRP 19.2 - trades for 24.8k
Nautilus 5711 MSRP 30.6 - trades for 68k

Seems like Royal Oaks is massively undervalued - What do you guys think?

For starters the RO clasp is far better than 5711 although the 5740 has a much improved one so that may be next. Overall seems like RO is more or less on par with a Nautilus besides that hairspring (and maybe some finishing details?). I suppose Patek does a better job at restricting supply, but less familiar with the other nuances in the current market.

Are APs next?
Not knocking Patek, but you may have it backwards. Seems like the Nautilus 5711 is massively overvalued. I expect prices on these to soften further. Just my opinion.
__________________
Instagram @dcash0615

2FA security active
dcash0615 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.