ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Ferdelious · 19 July 2014, 02:23 AM

Hi all, I'm considering flipping my 39mm Explorer I for either of these 2 watches. I love the Explorer but think I would enjoy wearing a Sea Dweller or no date Sub better. I have a SS Daytona, 16610 Sub, and 16710 GMT but yet to have a ceramic bezel which is what draws me to the 114060. That with the improved clasp that I have on the Explorer and heftier lugs. I do really like the Sea Dweller though and think it has such a great story and history behind it. So?

Kyu · 19 July 2014, 02:47 AM

I'd personally flip the older sub and get the newer sub's that way I can keep the exp and have every verity I wanted but that's just me and it is what I did

But if I was u I'd recommend the dssd u seem pretty interested in it
And u already have a sub
Also the dssd may look similar to the sub but for me they look and feel entirely different

7S26 · 19 July 2014, 03:19 AM

I will get either the 16600 SD or the new SD 4000.

FTX I · 19 July 2014, 03:22 AM

Sub

HogwldFLTR · 19 July 2014, 03:23 AM

114060 unless you have need for a GEV.

luvsub · 19 July 2014, 03:35 AM

Sd

Tobbe.l · 19 July 2014, 03:57 AM

SD for sure.

Clay · 19 July 2014, 04:01 AM

Need you ask…

landroverking · 19 July 2014, 04:02 AM

I live me some SD

macduffi · 19 July 2014, 04:04 AM

sub c

AK797 · 19 July 2014, 04:19 AM

Sell the Exp1 or sub for the subc, should have one ceramic in there for all the new updates.

superdog · 19 July 2014, 04:23 AM

i personally believe the 114060 is the best rolex has to offer.

i absolutely love it.

travisb · 19 July 2014, 04:59 AM

Get the Sub. Once you do, you'll know you made the right choice.

AndyK · 19 July 2014, 05:03 AM

Sub since you're leaning toward a ceramic bezel.

strafer_kid · 19 July 2014, 05:32 AM

Would have to be the SD!

Ed Man · 19 July 2014, 05:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by superdog

i personally believe the 114060 is the best rolex has to offer.

i absolutely love it.

I feel the same way!!!

Jack T · 19 July 2014, 06:03 AM

The new ceramic Sub is a great watch, but you already have a Sub, and a GMT. If it were me, I'd flip the older Sub, get the Subc. I have a hard time giving up an Explorer, with its versatility, simplicity and updates.

Jason71 · 19 July 2014, 06:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clay

Need you ask…

One of the best Rolex watches EVER offered

Roselló · 19 July 2014, 06:26 AM

I would get the SD 16600 or the SDc since you have a 16610 already.

REFZ · 19 July 2014, 08:43 AM

Sell your old Sub and buy the SDC 116600.
That way you have the SD and the C.

CalBears · 19 July 2014, 08:54 AM

I just sold my 2008 16610 and purchased a 114060 this week. I can't tell you how much I love the 114060. Go for the SubC!

stockae92 · 19 July 2014, 09:02 AM

Well, if you "love" the 39mm Explorer and flipping it for something that you think you might like, there is a risk there that you may not like the dive watches and would want the Explorer back ... I'm just saying.

SohAIS · 19 July 2014, 09:22 AM

Either one is a winner to me

f458 · 19 July 2014, 10:28 AM

Can't go wrong with the new sub, picked one up last week

melons · 19 July 2014, 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CalBears

I just sold my 2008 16610 and purchased a 114060 this week. I can't tell you how much I love the 114060. Go for the SubC!

I did the same a few months back, no regrets.

14060m · 19 July 2014, 10:48 AM

My answer is

https://www.rolexforums.com/attachme...1&d=1405730846

zama · 19 July 2014, 11:27 AM

Sd

mudd · 19 July 2014, 12:18 PM

16600

T01 · 19 July 2014, 01:10 PM

Tough call, go for whichever speaks to you more!

The_Walrus · 19 July 2014, 01:34 PM

SD for me

19 July 2014, 02:23 AM	#1
Ferdelious 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Matt Location: Tampa, FL Watch: Hulk/SD4K/SeaQ/P39 Posts: 3,178	16600 or 114060? Hi all, I'm considering flipping my 39mm Explorer I for either of these 2 watches. I love the Explorer but think I would enjoy wearing a Sea Dweller or no date Sub better. I have a SS Daytona, 16610 Sub, and 16710 GMT but yet to have a ceramic bezel which is what draws me to the 114060. That with the improved clasp that I have on the Explorer and heftier lugs. I do really like the Sea Dweller though and think it has such a great story and history behind it. So?

19 July 2014, 03:23 AM	#5
HogwldFLTR 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Lee Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48 Watch: What's on my wrist Posts: 33,256	114060 unless you have need for a GEV. __________________ Troglodyte in residence! https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599

19 July 2014, 04:04 AM	#10
macduffi "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Real Name: Todd James Location: North NJ, USA Watch: 116619LB & 228239 Posts: 459	sub c __________________ Time heals what reason cannot. -Seneca

19 July 2014, 04:23 AM	#12
superdog 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Seth Location: nj Watch: Omega Posts: 24,693	i personally believe the 114060 is the best rolex has to offer. i absolutely love it. __________________ If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it? IG: gsmotorclub IG: thesawcollection (Both mostly just car stuff)

19 July 2014, 06:03 AM	#17
Jack T "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Jack Location: The Triangle Watch: Several Posts: 6,623	The new ceramic Sub is a great watch, but you already have a Sub, and a GMT. If it were me, I'd flip the older Sub, get the Subc. I have a hard time giving up an Explorer, with its versatility, simplicity and updates. __________________ Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT

19 July 2014, 02:47 AM	#2
Kyu "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Real Name: yes.. it's Kyu Location: Los Angeles Watch: Rolex 116759SANR Posts: 1,499	I'd personally flip the older sub and get the newer sub's that way I can keep the exp and have every verity I wanted but that's just me and it is what I did But if I was u I'd recommend the dssd u seem pretty interested in it And u already have a sub Also the dssd may look similar to the sub but for me they look and feel entirely different

19 July 2014, 03:19 AM	#3
7S26 Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex 116200 + SD Posts: 240	I will get either the 16600 SD or the new SD 4000.

19 July 2014, 03:22 AM	#4
FTX I "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Flavio Location: N/A Posts: 14,652	Sub

19 July 2014, 03:35 AM	#6
luvsub 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: SF, south bay Posts: 5,179	Sd

19 July 2014, 03:57 AM	#7
Tobbe.l "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Real Name: Tobias Location: Sweden Watch: C-Dweller 116600 Posts: 96	SD for sure.

19 July 2014, 04:01 AM	#8
Clay Banned Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Up a tree Posts: 4,001	Need you ask…

19 July 2014, 04:02 AM	#9
landroverking "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Jay Location: TEXAS Watch: Daytona Posts: 7,648	I live me some SD

19 July 2014, 04:19 AM	#11
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,225	Sell the Exp1 or sub for the subc, should have one ceramic in there for all the new updates.

19 July 2014, 04:59 AM	#13
travisb 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 32,211	Get the Sub. Once you do, you'll know you made the right choice.

19 July 2014, 05:03 AM	#14
AndyK "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Chicago Watch: 216570 Posts: 878	Sub since you're leaning toward a ceramic bezel.

19 July 2014, 05:32 AM	#15
strafer_kid "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Kenny Location: northern ireland Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs Posts: 5,127	Would have to be the SD!

19 July 2014, 06:26 AM	#19
Roselló "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: SA, Texas. Watch: * { SD & DJ } * Posts: 943	I would get the SD 16600 or the SDc since you have a 16610 already. __________________ ......... All In.

19 July 2014, 08:43 AM	#20
REFZ "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Martin Location: Netherlands Watch: The Rolex Way Posts: 1,471	Sell your old Sub and buy the SDC 116600. That way you have the SD and the C. __________________ 114060 - 116520 - 126334

19 July 2014, 08:54 AM	#21
CalBears "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2014 Real Name: Mike Location: Los Angeles Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 40	I just sold my 2008 16610 and purchased a 114060 this week. I can't tell you how much I love the 114060. Go for the SubC!

19 July 2014, 09:02 AM	#22
stockae92 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Socal Posts: 4,881	Well, if you "love" the 39mm Explorer and flipping it for something that you think you might like, there is a risk there that you may not like the dive watches and would want the Explorer back ... I'm just saying. __________________ 135 ├┼┼╕ 246 R

19 July 2014, 09:22 AM	#23
SohAIS ⭐⭐⭐⭐ 2024 DATEJUST41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Aamir Location: Atlanta, Georgia Watch: Patek, Rolex Posts: 31,984	Either one is a winner to me

19 July 2014, 10:28 AM	#24
f458 Banned Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: canada Watch: DSSD 114060 sub bl Posts: 130	Can't go wrong with the new sub, picked one up last week

19 July 2014, 11:27 AM	#27
zama "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Craig Location: Sydney Watch: 4 Broken glass Posts: 5,806	Sd __________________ Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed..... Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze

19 July 2014, 12:18 PM	#28
mudd "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Texas Watch: 114060 Posts: 435	16600

19 July 2014, 01:10 PM	#29
T01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: T Location: AZ, NV, CA Posts: 6,481	Tough call, go for whichever speaks to you more!

19 July 2014, 01:34 PM	#30
The_Walrus "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: George Location: Sydney Watch: 5513 Posts: 1,104	SD for me

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)