5167 vs 5164

[roeezion]

Originally Posted by HauteHorlogerie

I went the other way... got my 64A first... then realized it was too thick, I didn't use the complication much and I prefer being able to read the date faster. The 67 is so thin it feels like a dress watch then you look down and it's so sporty. I also think the 5167R is the best patek sports piece outside the 5711/1R.

Does the thickness of the 64a vs 67a really show/feel on the wrist? i do wear sports rolexs and a 15500st so i am quite used to wearing thicker watches. the 5167r is a beauty and definitely questioned if buying the 67a was the right option considering the 67r wouldn't have been that much more.

[okie4455]

I have tried on both and imho the 67 was a little thin for a sports watch. I felt like the 64 was just right, I feel like the 64 wears far smaller than the rolex sub. But I would suggest trying both on.

[roeezion]

Originally Posted by ap1

I like my 64 much better than 67. More visual appeal to me and it’s not a thick piece at all but I prefer the few mm more than the three hander. Something that’s already light (rubber) i wanted a bit more presence

Agreed, I'm definitely more used to thicker watches so figured id prefer the dimensions of the 64 more.

[roeezion]

Originally Posted by okie4455

I have tried on both and imho the 67 was a little thin for a sports watch. I felt like the 64 was just right, I feel like the 64 wears far smaller than the rolex sub. But I would suggest trying both on.

Yep my 67 wears far smaller than my Sub so i figure the 64 would be a little closer. Nice change to have a thin light piece for now i guess.

[EUguy]

64 because of the second time zone and a little more interesting dial imho.

[HauteHorlogerie]

Originally Posted by roeezion

Does the thickness of the 64a vs 67a really show/feel on the wrist? i do wear sports rolexs and a 15500st so i am quite used to wearing thicker watches. the 5167r is a beauty and definitely questioned if buying the 67a was the right option considering the 67r wouldn't have been that much more.

To me there is a big difference. But that’s subjective. I do truly feel like the 64 is too thick and takes away from what appeals about the aquanaut to me. It disappears on the wrist, is thin like a dress watch but when you look down it’s so sporty and awesome. I love them both though but I have a lot of things I don’t like about the 64 that makes the 67 my choice if I could only keep one.