ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 March 2018, 02:56 AM | #151 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jon
Location: Bay Area
Watch: Rolex GMT BLNR
Posts: 1,339
|
Quote:
This is the problem. The op has plenty of time to disparage the forum but we still don’t know the full story. After all this time I think it’s been very clear that coming clean is the right path. As I said earlier, I feel like TRF is being trolled. The op’s comments and behavior are strange and don’t add up. And, after over 100 posts, we don’t yet know what really happened. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Platinum YM, BLNR, Rhodium YM, Tudor North Flag |
|
20 March 2018, 03:51 AM | #152 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Real Name: Jim
Location: Mass
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 439
|
Quote:
That's really weird. |
|
20 March 2018, 05:55 AM | #153 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 5,380
|
Quote:
Quote:
You are also saying, I guess, that since you are 33 and internet savvy, that you obviously knew that your "Daytona for sale for way more than I paid for it" post would be easily discovered by the masses here at TRF. I am curious why your FS post was deleted rather than you just leaving the thread there with a subsequent post saying, "I decided to keep it" or, "my AD busted me" or whatever. It appears that you buried your tracks as much as possible and didn't mention it in your very own thread despite it being incredibly on topic. And in fact changing the whole nature of the thread from "Don't do x" to "don't do what I did. I learned my lesson and perhaps you all can learn from my mistakes." I'm not sure why you fail to see the not so subtle differences between the two.
__________________
Datejust w/black Tapestry dial (1985) / Daytona (2016) |
||
20 March 2018, 06:44 AM | #154 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
Quote:
__________________
If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4. |
|
20 March 2018, 07:22 AM | #155 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: another planet
Posts: 608
|
Quote:
|
|
20 March 2018, 08:01 AM | #156 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Watch: SBGW231, SRP777
Posts: 567
|
Quote:
As for deleting the FS thread, after what occurred with the owner of the AD calling my cell phone and the conversation we had, I wanted to make sure I did everything in my power to correct the problem, including deleting the FS post. It would be unlikely that the FS post would have cause any problems, I simply wanted it to be gone and for the whole situation to be over and done with. I created this post to discuss the lesson I had just learned. Once again I should have provided more detail up front. I think I’ve admitted to this fact multiple times and I’ve taken full responsibility. |
|
20 March 2018, 08:04 AM | #157 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Watch: SBGW231, SRP777
Posts: 567
|
Backstory
I got a call that a 116500LN was available. I knew it’s an awesome watch and decided I could make money if I got the watch and sold it for a profit, or I could keep the watch. After about a week I put it for sale.
Then, last Wednesday I get a voicemail from the owner of the AD, I called him back knowing what to expect and I just told him the truth from the start. He said he could lose the Rolex line and told me I could keep the watch, sell it to a friend at MSRP, or simply return it to him. I told him I’d take care of it. When I got back home I peeled the stickers off, then the next day got the bracelet sized. While at the AD I spoke with my sales person. All I can honestly say is that this entire situation can’t possibly help her employment, and it’s my fault. Also, I was told that a customer had seen my watch for sale and figured out it was from this AD where he was on the list. Imagine how he would have felt! What would a customer realistically do in the future in this situation, bottom line is this hurt the customers trust in the AD, it hurt the sale person, if it got back to Rolex it could hurt the AD’s ability to get the premium pieces, and it could ultimately cause the AD to have more serious consequences from Rolex. |
20 March 2018, 08:13 AM | #158 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Rolex
Location: CA
Watch: All of them
Posts: 443
|
Quote:
Finally! So how did the AD trace the FS ad to you?? How could a customer trace a watch for sale to a particular AD? How much longer till Baselworld????
__________________
116518LN 116610LN 126710BLRO "Pepsi" 116619LB SMURF 126334 |
|
20 March 2018, 08:26 AM | #159 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Faz
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: like'em all
Posts: 4,655
|
Quote:
Quote:
The above together would have made an awesome first post in this thread, with a large number of forum readers coming in to support your point of view and would agree wholeheartedly with your lesson learned. Thanks for sharing your story, I for one would not flip and even discouraged a friend who while visiting Canada came across a 116500 and who was thinking about bringing to US to sell here. I kinda convinced him to let it go if he wasn't interested for himself and let the next lucky buyer to get the call.
__________________
-Faz Instagram @fazmoto |
||
20 March 2018, 08:30 AM | #160 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,707
|
Fair play OP, must have been an awkward situation. I get it.
My view on it though... If I was the customer, I would be miffed but not upset with the AD, it's just the way it works. I want a Nautilus but can't get one because I've not earned my stripes with a PP AD. I don't like this, but it's the way it works with premium products so I accept it. I also accept there will be some PP customers who can get a Nautilus and will then flip it for a profit. If I was the sales-person, I wouldn't care. I sold to someone I thought was genuine, nothing I can do. If I was the AD, I got my 40% mark-up, so I'm all good. If I was Rolex, then I'd be over the moon that people are flipping for way above Retail!! PP recently put a big price increase on the Nautilus, you think they'd have been able to do that if they weren't selling for massive premiums on the grey market?? So all should have been good. Is there perhaps a missing piece to this jigsaw? Did the sales-person by any chance bump you up the list because you know them? Is this why they are in trouble and why the AD was upset? If not, this is the weirdest behaviour from an AD ever. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune |
20 March 2018, 08:34 AM | #161 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,033
|
Lol to that owner. You can either, this or that. Ah, no thanks.
I literally was one of (if not ) the first (7am basel release day 2016) to call my AD for the D5. This is in a large market where many shop here. Tons of people got theirs I suspect from my shop and posted them here and I’m still waiting (for that AD to call). I’ve since acquired both with a new AD, that apparently values me more. No way Id do that original AD any favors. I’d probably list it here for 22k and list their stamped card.. payment for my wait. |
20 March 2018, 09:03 AM | #162 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Real Name: Jim
Location: Mass
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 439
|
|
20 March 2018, 09:15 AM | #163 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,352
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.