The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 October 2018, 09:22 PM   #31
travisb
"TRF" Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 32,027
2 liner.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2018, 09:44 PM   #32
Watch Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by faimag View Post
The best choice, you already made it: it's a 5-digit that looks great on your wrist! As for which model, all look lovely, so go with whichever sings to you.
Thank you faimag.
Watch Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2018, 09:46 PM   #33
Watch Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjclark32 View Post
I’ve been wearing a 16610 for 7/8 years 99% of the time. To me it’s a go anywhere/do anything piece. That’s my pick, good luck!
Awesome, thank you. It really is a Sophie's choice between these great watches.
Watch Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2018, 09:49 PM   #34
Watch Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by travisb View Post
2 liner.
Love the looks of the 2 liner, however i'm tempted to look for as modern a Sub as I can i.e. around 2007-2010. Not sure though.
Watch Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2018, 10:18 PM   #35
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,443
The good news is that the Explorer is such a versatile watch, it's gonna go great with any of your choices.

The bad news is...well, there's no bad news.
watchwatcher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2018, 10:22 PM   #36
Watch Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchwatcher View Post
The good news is that the Explorer is such a versatile watch, it's gonna go great with any of your choices.

The bad news is...well, there's no bad news.
Haha thanks Larry. These are nice problems to have
Watch Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2018, 10:23 PM   #37
1William
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 44,325
I would change up a bit and get the Omega if it can be purchased with a significant discount. I am and have always been a Submariner fan and probably get ride of the Explorer and get a Submariner. I would wear it for a bit and then figure out my next purchase. Two black face Rolex watches would not be my two watch collection. The Omega would solve that though.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2018, 10:36 PM   #38
Watch Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1William View Post
I would change up a bit and get the Omega if it can be purchased with a significant discount. I am and have always been a Submariner fan and probably get ride of the Explorer and get a Submariner. I would wear it for a bit and then figure out my next purchase. Two black face Rolex watches would not be my two watch collection. The Omega would solve that though.
Thank you, thats an interesting proposition. I will no doubt keep the Explorer though. The Omega does offer a lot for the money too, cheers.
Watch Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2018, 10:40 PM   #39
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by RHIII View Post
14060


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This ^^^
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2018, 11:38 PM   #40
Watch Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
Should I throw a Sea Dweller 16600 into the mix? I haven't managed to try one yet, will it likely wear too big for me?
Watch Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 12:33 AM   #41
jenedla
"TRF" Member
 
jenedla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Watch: can't choose
Posts: 330
I think this order of choices would best pair with what you have:
1. Explorer 2 16570 Polar
2. Sub date 16610
3. Sub no date 14060/M

Regarding a 16600, I don't think they wear big at all. I found it to be simply a matter of being thicker, not "bigger." If you threw that into the mix, I would put it a #2 or 3. Polar still comes in first.
jenedla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 12:36 AM   #42
Watch Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seibei View Post
Sub no date, of course.
Watch Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 12:40 AM   #43
Watch Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by jenedla View Post
I think this order of choices would best pair with what you have:
1. Explorer 2 16570 Polar
2. Sub date 16610
3. Sub no date 14060/M

Regarding a 16600, I don't think they wear big at all. I found it to be simply a matter of being thicker, not "bigger." If you threw that into the mix, I would put it a #2 or 3. Polar still comes in first.
Thank you for your opinion Jenedla. I may have to track down a 16600 to try before I make a final decision. I agree that a duo of Explorers could really give the collection somewhat of a theme going forward.
Watch Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 03:28 AM   #44
judson
"TRF" Member
 
judson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Watch: changes depending
Posts: 800
I own an Explorer 39 MK1, a Polar 16570, Sub date 16610 and the Seamaster Trilogy LE.

The Sub date is the most striking watch of the group. There is something about the bezel that catches the light just right that is mesmerizing to me. I have small wrists and the bracelet does not fit just right which bothers me.

The Explorer 2 16570 Polar was the watch that I wanted for the longest and looks great in pictures. It is more washed out in real life and gets the least wear. I found one NOS a few years ago and couldn't bring myself to take off the stickers for two years. While it is not my favorite on my wrist, I will never sell it.

The Omega '57 Seamaster trilogy LE is the most comfortable watch of the group. It has just enough bling to be noticed but the small bezel makes it more of a dressy diver to me than the others. Some people have complained about the size of the clasp, but it is adjustable and adds to the comfort. This or my Seiko are the go to watches when I'm just kicking about.

I don't have a major favorite among the group, my theory has always been to buy the nicest watch that you can afford, I have never been disappointed.
judson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 11:06 AM   #45
Watch Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by judson View Post
I own an Explorer 39 MK1, a Polar 16570, Sub date 16610 and the Seamaster Trilogy LE.

The Sub date is the most striking watch of the group. There is something about the bezel that catches the light just right that is mesmerizing to me. I have small wrists and the bracelet does not fit just right which bothers me.

The Explorer 2 16570 Polar was the watch that I wanted for the longest and looks great in pictures. It is more washed out in real life and gets the least wear. I found one NOS a few years ago and couldn't bring myself to take off the stickers for two years. While it is not my favorite on my wrist, I will never sell it.

The Omega '57 Seamaster trilogy LE is the most comfortable watch of the group. It has just enough bling to be noticed but the small bezel makes it more of a dressy diver to me than the others. Some people have complained about the size of the clasp, but it is adjustable and adds to the comfort. This or my Seiko are the go to watches when I'm just kicking about.

I don't have a major favorite among the group, my theory has always been to buy the nicest watch that you can afford, I have never been disappointed.
Hi Judson. Thanks for your input, thats an amazing collection you have and a similar taste as myself!

I agree that the Subs had more of a 'wow' factor when trying them on....I find that sometimes under the lights the way the white gold indices shimmer on my Explorer also looks stunning. I'm not sure if the Polar Exp.2 would have such a striking effect with them painted black?

The main thing that draws me to the Seamaster is the adjustable clasp and living in a hot climate that would definitely come in handy.

The Exp.2 and Seamaster i could get for a similar price however the Subs I would need to add around $1500 more.
Watch Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 11:20 AM   #46
kaien
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: DC Metro Area
Posts: 146
Sub-date gets my vote
kaien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 11:43 AM   #47
Jonesy2099
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 388
I think the Sub Date is your best option. My reasons are: I think it looks better than the other three watches listed, the date function has always been useful to me, the glidelock is a great feature, it will hold its value better than the Seamaster, it has a scratch resistant ceramic bezel (the Explorer II doesn’t have this). But getting back to my first point it’s the most attractive watch there in my view. There is a good argument that the Sub looks cleaner but I prefer the date and cyclops! Good luck deciding, it’s a difficult decision.
Jonesy2099 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 11:54 AM   #48
sunnygps
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,126
Although, the sub no date looks the best on your wrist, My recommendation will be the Sub date 16610. I prefer the date function and think it is more versatile.
sunnygps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 12:04 PM   #49
Dompropat
"TRF" Member
 
Dompropat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: CT
Watch: Sub
Posts: 357
Sub date
Dompropat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 12:52 PM   #50
Watch Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonesy2099 View Post
I think the Sub Date is your best option. My reasons are: I think it looks better than the other three watches listed, the date function has always been useful to me, the glidelock is a great feature, it will hold its value better than the Seamaster, it has a scratch resistant ceramic bezel (the Explorer II doesn’t have this). But getting back to my first point it’s the most attractive watch there in my view. There is a good argument that the Sub looks cleaner but I prefer the date and cyclops! Good luck deciding, it’s a difficult decision.
Thanks Joesy. However I'm pretty sure I will be going for a pre-ceramic model, so unfortunately no glidelock clasp on those models. I believe at the moment for me it is between the Subs and the Polar.
Watch Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 12:57 PM   #51
Watch Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunnygps View Post
Although, the sub no date looks the best on your wrist, My recommendation will be the Sub date 16610. I prefer the date function and think it is more versatile.
Thanks Sunnygps. I do want whatever I buy to look good on the wrist! It's perculiar that they can wear and appear differently in the pics given that the Rolex's are all 40mm but I agree. I think there are slight differences in the dimensions actually. Possibly with no solid end links helps the No date look the best suited for my wrist from those pictures also.
Watch Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 01:02 PM   #52
ahlee00023
"TRF" Member
 
ahlee00023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 462
Daytona

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
__________________
"The Secret of Life is to Enjoy It"
ahlee00023 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 01:13 PM   #53
Scapegoat
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Lee
Location: South East Asia
Watch: Tudor Pro
Posts: 1,752
Submariner Date.
Scapegoat is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 01:25 PM   #54
Watch Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dompropat View Post
Sub date
I see you have one and it looks great
Watch Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 01:26 PM   #55
Watch Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahlee00023 View Post
Daytona

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Yes please, maybe someday.
Watch Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 04:06 PM   #56
Watch Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
If I went with a no date Sub, is it something consider that it has the same movement as the Explorer and maybe not worth adding purely due to aesthetics? I really like how it felt and looked.
Watch Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 04:15 PM   #57
bmclaurin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 434
Exp II but I’m biased
bmclaurin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 04:34 PM   #58
Watch Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
A few more pics
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Exp2-3.jpg (223.2 KB, 38 views)
File Type: jpg Sub3.jpg (200.8 KB, 40 views)
File Type: jpg Subdate3.jpg (186.8 KB, 39 views)
Watch Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 05:49 PM   #59
SS Oyster
"TRF" Member
 
SS Oyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 8,801
I’d vote Sub no date


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SS Oyster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 10:35 PM   #60
Pauln
"TRF" Member
 
Pauln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Paul
Location: Colorado
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,543
If you’re keeping the Explorer, I’d go Exp 2. If you decide to trade the Explorer, I’d go Sub ND.
Pauln is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.