Get rid of Sub C for PAM 233?

[Pattyb69]

I may be able to get a less biased opinion posting in this forum seeing that you guys in here are both PAM and Rolex fans.

I should preface that I was a Panerai fan before I got into Rolex and I've been itching to get another one ever since I traded my PAM 112 for a Sub C. I've been wearing my Sub C for about a year now and I just added the BLNR into the mix a couple weeks ago. I am very happy with both watches and even though I think they have their differences, they both wear similarly on the wrist.

So I'm wondering what do you guys think about trading my Sub C for a PAM 233? The BLNR would stay because getting the same deal on it would be difficult where the Sub could be had in the future for about the same price. Keeping both Rolexes right now and adding a PAM isn't an option. One has to go

I go back and forth because the Sub is THE perfect daily. Its just so damn versatile and comfortable but it also feels a bit "safe" and similar to the BLNR.

So what do you guys think?

Here is the current line up:




Here is the PAM 233 (Photo courtesy of Traveller)