ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 August 2016, 01:46 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Asia
Posts: 714
|
There're watches at different price point. They're for different style/activities/purpose.
Tudor is a no fancy and practical brand that I admire! I wear Omega, Seiko, G-Shock, and Rolex. And I love them all. |
5 August 2016, 01:52 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Canberra, Aus
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 59
|
People looking down on Tudor and "starter rolex models"
Did you listen to them? Who are you trying to make happy?
Love the explorer for reasons you said. Even your snow flake pictured. Personally I would like the north flag one day. Also I think it's funny you heard that about the sub? The added date window is not that unattainable when comparing the cost of non date. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
5 August 2016, 01:54 PM | #33 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Danny
Location: Bay Area CA
Watch: Yellow Gold
Posts: 20,166
|
When I was @Marthas Vineyard 2 years ago a guy told me Tudor is for people that cant afford a Rolex .....that is not true I have a Rolex and I actually want a bronze Tudor so some people are not educated but I forgive them.
|
5 August 2016, 02:00 PM | #34 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,355
|
I don't really recognise this, see a lot of incoming Tudor threads which receive lots of positive responses. Same for the Submariner, much liked here
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
5 August 2016, 02:16 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 4,341
|
There are many "pretentious" people out there who try to put other people down for no good reason and pretend they are better than others. Don't let these people get to you. Tudor makes some great watches and even the least expensive Rolex watches are made to very high Rolex standards.
|
5 August 2016, 02:17 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: D-Blue, GS SBGE001
Posts: 695
|
|
5 August 2016, 02:27 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Syed
Location: The Ether
Posts: 3,388
|
I see it from time to time.
We can't say because it's completely hypothetical, but I imagine things would be very different if Tudor was not owned by rolex. If it was its own brand. Never been a fan of Tudor personally, but what we do see a lot more of is every other brand being disregarded when compared to rolex. Most people here are fairly supportive of Tudor. Wear what you like and don't be worried about what others have to say.
__________________
Rolex Datejust 41 126334 | Omega Speedmaster Professional Hesalite | Cartier Santos Large | Tudor Black Bay 58 |
5 August 2016, 03:03 PM | #38 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 187
|
Quote:
|
|
5 August 2016, 03:06 PM | #39 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
I remember referring to it as the Deepseaweed because of the green printing on the dial. I have to admit that is was a detractor at first based upon the press release pics. The watch sort of had a gimmicky aura about it and everything else surrounding it. Then I saw one in real life at the local AD and I realized I was so(and wrongly) prejudiced about it. To me the watch stands on its own merits and exceeds the marketing hype. I say disregard the prejudice and wear whatever one likes. |
|
5 August 2016, 05:08 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: WA
Watch: SubC/Pelagos
Posts: 512
|
This is my story. I knew little about and had zero interest in Tudor till long after I had my subc. They are VERY different watches but both great for what they are. The only watches I truly can't take serious are homages or fakes. Aside from that they all have value to me.
|
5 August 2016, 05:25 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 54
|
"explorer 1 and no date sub being something you only buy if you cannot afford a sub or date version"
Wow that is one of the most ridiculous statement someone could ever say. It probably came from someone who is too negative yet envious because they couldnt afford one. In my opinion the Explorer 1 is a very simple and casual watch for everyday use, just like a stainless steel Date Just. As for the sub, man i always loved the No Date Submariner especially if it has a Nato strap on. Besides, the no date and 16613 sub are around the same value. No date sub is probably one of the most classy adventure - out door watch. But at the end of the day, if someone judges a person's self worth from the watch they wear then its rather sad. There will never be someone who has the best watch. A rolex owner might look down on a Tudor or Tag Heuer owner but remember, there will always be another mountain higher..have you heard of AP, Patek Phillipe, Richard Mille..at the list goes on. |
5 August 2016, 05:48 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 99
|
Tudor is awesome. Maybe some people are just envious...
|
5 August 2016, 08:31 PM | #43 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: nicholas
Location: ottawa canada
Watch: Rolex,AP,Panerai
Posts: 9,476
|
Josh, who cares what others think and say. I recall you sold your stunning BLRO because you thought it was too flashy at work or as a daily. Correct me if I am wrong, but that lead you to buying the Tudor and whatever else you are buying. Now, you get some snot telling you these negative remarks of your new purchases that I see you adore. Enjoy what you have, my father always said, people are not always happy of your successes, but are ecstatic of your failures. So, enjoy what you have, be faithful in your own decisions and aim to please yourself. Don't worry about anyone else, otherwise you will be constantly second guess yourself your whole life.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
5 August 2016, 08:34 PM | #44 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 24,603
|
Quote:
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 2230.50.00 Zenith 02.470.405 Henry Archer Eclipse 2FA security enabled |
|
5 August 2016, 08:39 PM | #45 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Canberra, Aus
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 59
|
Quote:
Easy to say but hard to do. A mantra worth reading each morning. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
5 August 2016, 08:44 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
There are a lot here that look at watches thru Rolex blinders.
That's said. There a whole world of fine watches out there. |
5 August 2016, 09:22 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
|
Hey guys. I can see now that this thread was not necessary just to point out a few bad apples. We have an amazing community here. Perhaps this thread generates some positive discussion anyway. Well I'm off to bed after a long night shift. Have a great day everyone.
|
5 August 2016, 09:27 PM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Lots
Posts: 4,354
|
I think the intentions of the post were good, but seems a bit dramatic. I can't recall ever seeing this, other than maybe people arguing if a Tudor is a Rolex.
Seems much ado about nothing...buy what you like |
5 August 2016, 09:32 PM | #49 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Florida
Watch: 5060/a
Posts: 1,119
|
Ignorant things people say....we also call those opinions and we are all entitled to them.
I personally like Tudor but am only willing to put money towards their vintage 40mm submariners. Quote:
|
|
5 August 2016, 09:43 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Watch: 1991 14060 Sub
Posts: 498
|
Unless something has changed in the past few months I've NEVER seen anyone on this board ever scoff at a Tudor or a no-date sub.
In fact, the No-Date sub is probably one of the most highest regarded watches on this board, at least from my experience. I have an early '90s Tudor chronograph that I love - wearing it today actually.
__________________
1991 14060 Submariner 1994 Tudor Big Block 1995 Rolex Explorer II 1992 Omega Speedmaster Pro |
5 August 2016, 09:45 PM | #51 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
I own many watches including this 4 pieces and love them as equally
|
5 August 2016, 09:57 PM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: UK
Watch: ing the sunset....
Posts: 171
|
I haven't noticed this ' one upmanshhip ' on this forum tbh. Plenty of people out there who can afford a collection of Rolexes but don't own one and there are plenty of people out there who scrimp, save and sell their children to own a Rolex for the perceived prestige and 'image' they want it to portray.
My point is that the watch you wear is neither a indicator of wealth or social standing. People that think otherwise tend to be the ones who look down their nose at cheaper brands or references. It would be interesting to see how many of these people would buy a black bay if it was branded ' Rolex' and not their current Rolex if it was branded Tudor..... |
5 August 2016, 10:01 PM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Real Name: john
Location: ireland
Watch: Rolex ,PP
Posts: 701
|
explorer1 and 114060 sub ,,, both super watches
|
5 August 2016, 10:06 PM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: DFW - Texas
Posts: 123
|
Great post. Being happy and appreciative of what you have is all that matters. I wear all ranges of brands and don't care what people think.
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk |
5 August 2016, 10:12 PM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: East Sussex U
Posts: 1,351
|
What's interesting is design and performance. These things are only very loosely tied to price. I think Tudor tend to look better than some Rolexes, but that has nothing to do with price.
There is a little status tied to Rolex, but that wears off pretty quickly. This hobby is about fun.....not status. |
5 August 2016, 10:15 PM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Rick
Location: Emmaus, PA
Watch: Tudor 79090 blue
Posts: 298
|
If you haven't noticed the comments downing Tudor it's because you don't care for the brand that much. There is definitely some snobbiness about Rolex vs. Tudor, but I'd say it's from a small minority of forum members. All and all I love TRF!
Not sure about the Explorer 1/no date portion of the post though. I believe there was recently a thread about "beginner" Rolex, and the general sentiment was that there is no beginner Rolex... Just different models. |
5 August 2016, 10:15 PM | #57 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,232
|
I think Tudor gets a lot of love on this forum, and many members who own a collection of Rolexes then go and buy one, myself included, and that speaks a lot to their quality and charm. I finally put my TBBN on a fabric strap and thought this would probably feel too insubstantial but it's the opposite, with the gilt dial on a strap I feel rather like Sean Connery.
|
5 August 2016, 10:36 PM | #58 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
Quote:
|
|
5 August 2016, 11:02 PM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Nathan
Location: Disneyland, Calif
Watch: 20th Moon, ND Sub.
Posts: 931
|
|
5 August 2016, 11:03 PM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,615
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.