ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 November 2022, 08:00 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Caribbean
Posts: 421
|
Thin hand subdial 6239 Daytona
Good afternoon fellas,
Is a thin hand on the seconds subdial of a 6239 correct? Picture below. Shouldn't they all be the same? Thank you, |
9 November 2022, 08:18 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 419
|
The thin seconds hand is normal on the 6239. I'm not sure about the hour hand though as many of them were fitted with a longer hand that almost touches the indices:
|
9 November 2022, 09:08 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Caribbean
Posts: 421
|
Thank you. But were they manufactured along with fat hands also? I ask because I've seen also 6239 with all subdial hands looking alike. The same.
|
9 November 2022, 12:45 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Caribbean
Posts: 421
|
Found an interesting from Hodinkee article on the subject. Here is the link for everyone to see.
https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/th...enjamin-clymer |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.