The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 September 2017, 06:08 AM   #1
LAFLARE
"TRF" Member
 
LAFLARE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 833
The Appeal of Royal Oak Offshore 42mm's

What is going on with the ROO's, in terms of the 42mm's? This is not a flame thread or me bashing on 42's, but in general it seems as if the 42mm is losing its appeal and prices are being driven downwards. Personally, I am still very passionate about certain models, but a lot of the 42mm off shores look almost outdated to me. Does anyone feel this way as well or am I alone here?

Side note: My (very orange) 44 Novelty is on the way and I've been living in this subsection of the forum
LAFLARE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2017, 07:03 AM   #2
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
I like the 42's and actually prefer the size slightly to the 44's. That said, the ceramic bezels and the better chronograph pusher shape on the 44's make them more appealing to me. For a 42mm, i would get a diver.

The 42mm ROO chronographs are still popular but they are boxed in pretty tightly between the divers and 44mm's.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2017, 07:12 AM   #3
mspeed76
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: United States
Watch: AP, RM
Posts: 605
when AP first introduced the 44mm offshores they created an arbitrary gap between the two case sizes by bumping up the price and including ceramic bezels on regular production pieces.

And they haven't released anything appealing (IMO) or with a premium bezel in 42mm since the RB2 and Jarno Trulli 7-10 years ago.

New collectors probably never even heard about those models and associate 42mm with the lower end of the offshore range.
mspeed76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2017, 07:41 AM   #4
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
IMHO I have the best ROO 42, the ceramic diver, love the TI 44, but having thought it through I don't think I will get it, I think the 42 size is better for me.
And yes I must say that apart the ce diver, I don't love any other 42 really, ok love the Trulli and RB2, but between them and the ce diver, would still choose the diver I think
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2017, 08:01 AM   #5
2nastie
"TRF" Member
 
2nastie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: YVR
Watch: Time Only
Posts: 2,332
The 42 case size has turned more into Diver's category for AP.

Plus it doesn't really seem like they have much variety with the chronos on the 42 line. Most novelties are all in the 44 range.

This seems more like AP's decision vs. the desire of the market. If you offer a similar watch at a larger size, the market seems to forget about the "smaller" version and purchase the larger model.
2nastie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2017, 09:59 AM   #6
jem7v
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Maryland
Posts: 842
I think if they brought back the black themes I'd buy a 42mm. Or the CE diver. The 42mm size is definitely better for my wrist. But I tolerate the 44mm because it's far better looking. But if tomorrow AP brought back the black themes, I'd buy one. I want an all steel ROO on that alligator horseback strap.
jem7v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2017, 10:11 AM   #7
benlee
"TRF" Member
 
benlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,873
The problem is the design. Chronos ROO 42mm as a category are relatively plainer looking and a neither here nor there positioning in the market. For those wanting an entry level ROO a diver is a better proposition. For those willing to oay more will go for the 44mm that have the advantage of ceramic bezel and an even sportier look. If well designed like the RBs and Ginza it should improve demand.
__________________
Follow me on Instagram : benlee789
benlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2017, 12:42 PM   #8
LAFLARE
"TRF" Member
 
LAFLARE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 833
I'd like to point my finger at the hour markers as one of the reasons that it looks outdated. Something about the shape of those numbers...

That is a very good point that was brought up about the divers. I initially never payed much attention to them but they do present themselves much more aesthetically pleasing than the other models.
LAFLARE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2017, 12:49 PM   #9
LAFLARE
"TRF" Member
 
LAFLARE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 833
Does anyone have any opinions of how well either the RG chronos or 44's hold their value?
LAFLARE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2017, 01:16 PM   #10
GB-man
2024 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,815
I feel the 44 fits better than the 42. I frankly wish there were all a bit smaller but I digress.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2017, 02:05 PM   #11
HK Islandboy
"TRF" Member
 
HK Islandboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
I like the 42s a lot and like the current black and red, blue and orange (and the Pt, of course!!!!) - but not enough to actually buy any of them. That having been said, the more I wear my ROO Panda, the more impressed by it I am. The only downside is that more wear does mean that the bezel looks less than perfect now.
HK Islandboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2017, 05:09 PM   #12
DeeTee
"TRF" Member
 
DeeTee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Netflix
Posts: 3,977
Quote:
Originally Posted by benlee View Post
The problem is the design. Chronos ROO 42mm as a category are relatively plainer looking and a neither here nor there positioning in the market. For those wanting an entry level ROO a diver is a better proposition. For those willing to oay more will go for the 44mm that have the advantage of ceramic bezel and an even sportier look. If well designed like the RBs and Ginza it should improve demand.
Agreed 100%
DeeTee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2017, 07:19 PM   #13
bluebeamer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Asia
Posts: 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by jem7v View Post
I think if they brought back the black themes I'd buy a 42mm. Or the CE diver. The 42mm size is definitely better for my wrist. But I tolerate the 44mm because it's far better looking. But if tomorrow AP brought back the black themes, I'd buy one. I want an all steel ROO on that alligator horseback strap.
the 2014 novelty is essentially black themes with red highlights. why don't you consider it?

https://www.audemarspiguet.com/en/wa....OO.A101CR.01/
bluebeamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2017, 07:36 PM   #14
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluebeamer View Post
the 2014 novelty is essentially black themes with red highlights. why don't you consider it?

https://www.audemarspiguet.com/en/wa....OO.A101CR.01/
for me its too much red. I prefer the black/white color palette. I picked a black diver over the 42mm chronograph because of that. Really the only two being considered at the time were the elephant and the black diver.

I still think the elephant is the best 42mm ROO chronograph but I'm not really sure why i never ended up with one. It always seemed to be the second choice in almost every head to head i have done.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2017, 07:42 PM   #15
Audguy
"TRF" Member
 
Audguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Miami
Posts: 92
the 42 panda and safari are the best of the 42's i think the watches are very different the 42 is more of a daily watch
Audguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2017, 12:26 AM   #16
yoast
"TRF" Member
 
yoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: HK
Posts: 2,242
I think the entire 42mm line is outdated and the 44s are too big. Best thing would be to morph the 44s into 42 and phase out the 44mm line imo.
Many people I talk to that owned a 44 have all sold them when the honeymoon is over, because of the size.
__________________
IG: @yoast.watch
https://www.instagram.com/yoast.watch/
yoast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2017, 01:47 AM   #17
jem7v
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Maryland
Posts: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluebeamer View Post
the 2014 novelty is essentially black themes with red highlights. why don't you consider it?

https://www.audemarspiguet.com/en/wa....OO.A101CR.01/
the red highlights ruin it. takes away the versatility
jem7v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2017, 01:50 AM   #18
jem7v
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Maryland
Posts: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoast View Post
I think the entire 42mm line is outdated and the 44s are too big. Best thing would be to morph the 44s into 42 and phase out the 44mm line imo.
Many people I talk to that owned a 44 have all sold them when the honeymoon is over, because of the size.
I agree with this. I'd prefer a 42mm.
jem7v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2017, 02:01 AM   #19
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoast View Post
I think the entire 42mm line is outdated and the 44s are too big. Best thing would be to morph the 44s into 42 and phase out the 44mm line imo.
Many people I talk to that owned a 44 have all sold them when the honeymoon is over, because of the size.
And many haven’t because we have bigger wrists and it wears perfectly.

And also want a bigger fun watch to wear on weekends. I love all sizes myself from 39-44 and each has it’s place for me in my collection.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2017, 02:15 AM   #20
HK Islandboy
"TRF" Member
 
HK Islandboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by jem7v View Post
the red highlights ruin it. takes away the versatility
I quite like it...though, to be fair, not enough to buy it!
HK Islandboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2017, 02:16 AM   #21
AshAP
"TRF" Member
 
AshAP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAFLARE View Post
I'd like to point my finger at the hour markers as one of the reasons that it looks outdated. Something about the shape of those numbers...

That is a very good point that was brought up about the divers. I initially never payed much attention to them but they do present themselves much more aesthetically pleasing than the other models.


I had the rose gold rubber clad but as soon as I got my platinum 44 I felt the numbers marking the hours looked dated so I felt it was time to sell.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
AshAP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2017, 02:16 AM   #22
HK Islandboy
"TRF" Member
 
HK Islandboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by jem7v View Post
I agree with this. I'd prefer a 42mm.
Let me me know if you feel the need to dump your RG
HK Islandboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2017, 02:24 AM   #23
HK Islandboy
"TRF" Member
 
HK Islandboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Audguy View Post
the 42 panda and safari are the best of the 42's i think the watches are very different the 42 is more of a daily watch




Agreed. I like the Panda a lot...also the CE Diver.

Not in my collection, but 42s I'd seriously consider owning include a number of the LEs (gentlemen driver, Rubens barrichello stand out, but aren't alone)




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HK Islandboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2017, 04:04 AM   #24
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,066
I really liked the 42s but when the 44s came out they were a class ahead. I also felt the 42s wore smaller as the chrono dials were small, so altho the 44 is bigger, but not exponentially by much if you can wear a 42, I feel the 44 is the better balanced watch for flat 6.5 inch wrists and above.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2017, 04:24 AM   #25
Betta01
"TRF" Member
 
Betta01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Singapore
Posts: 183
I like the 42 for the smaller size plus I find the pusher design of the 44 too bulky..


Sent from my HUAWEI NXT-L29 using Tapatalk
Betta01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2017, 04:43 AM   #26
jrs146
"TRF" Member
 
jrs146's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Audguy View Post
the 42 panda and safari are the best of the 42's i think the watches are very different the 42 is more of a daily watch


I agree. The 42 panda is a great daily watch. 44 is too big for me as a daily.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own."
-Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter
jrs146 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2017, 10:57 PM   #27
Tomas Eriksson
"TRF" Member
 
Tomas Eriksson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Stockholm
Watch: 15707CE
Posts: 1,979
I do own the ceramic diver but the steel diver is also a great piece. I would almost like to claim that the steel diver is one of the best "entry level" pieces of any swiss brand.

__________________
State of the union: 5066A,15400ST,15707CE,116610LN,26470OR and a few other…
Tomas Eriksson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2017, 11:24 PM   #28
P2725TMB
2024 Pledge Member
 
P2725TMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Watch: AP, Rolex, Omega
Posts: 1,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by Betta01 View Post
I like the 42 for the smaller size plus I find the pusher design of the 44 too bulky..


Sent from my HUAWEI NXT-L29 using Tapatalk
Must admit I feel the opposite. I think the pusher design of the 44 is superb both visually and functionally. In contrast the simple 'button' pushers of the 42s are my main dislike of that model. I am considering a 42 but for me its the pushers that are the biggest negative to the design.
P2725TMB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2017, 11:31 PM   #29
jem7v
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Maryland
Posts: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by P2725TMB View Post
Must admit I feel the opposite. I think the pusher design of the 44 is superb both visually and functionally. In contrast the simple 'button' pushers of the 42s are my main dislike of that model. I am considering a 42 but for me its the pushers that are the biggest negative to the design.
They could easily solve this but making pushers designed the way they are on the diver. I know on the diver those aren't pushers, but a pusher could easily be designed the same way.

AP actually has all the tools necessary to really push themselves to a whole new level. For whatever reason they just don't have the brain. They focus constantly on the 44mm, and the super high end, and ignore everything else it looks like.

Or, they just don't care. Majority of the clients just buy the watch to flaunt. They don't care necessarily what it looks like.
jem7v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2017, 12:46 AM   #30
smeowly
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: singapore
Posts: 331


These 2 and the steel n rose gold rubberclads are my favorite 42s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
smeowly is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.