The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

View Poll Results: Which to you looks best on the wrist ?
Sub C date 116610 LN 95 45.24%
Sub C ND 114060 79 37.62%
Sub LN 1990's 13 6.19%
Sub F Serial 2005 23 10.95%
Voters: 210. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 October 2018, 10:52 AM   #1
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
<<<<< Which Sub Looks Best ? >>>>>

Did a little window shopping today.
There's a local jeweler who specializes in preowned Rolex
here in town for many decades.
Prices are Ok as everyone who is in the business
knows the current market and is capitalizing on it so
no secret there. Just went in to try on the different
references for comparison...

Main thing is they had pretty much all in stock
except a 5 digit Sea Dweller 16600 and 5 digit ND Sub.
So out of these 4 that I've tried on which looks best on my wrist?
Thinking of doing a little shifting around ...

Picture of 5 digit purplish dial Bluesy just for fun...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 10:54 AM   #2
rmlovett1
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
rmlovett1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 22,570
The 116610 looks great!
rmlovett1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 10:58 AM   #3
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Uploading now..
There we go ...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 11:11 AM   #4
antbkny
"TRF" Member
 
antbkny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: Dblue
Posts: 6,723
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richris1 View Post
The 116610 looks great!
x2
antbkny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 11:13 AM   #5
prakhon
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Chicago
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 52
Really fun. Thanks for posting!!!
prakhon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 11:33 AM   #6
BVLDARI
"TRF" Member
 
BVLDARI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 923
ha, not surprised with the results... i am with the crowd.
BVLDARI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 11:59 AM   #7
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Well, I'm not surprised ...
The Sub C date does look fantastic but the ND Sub C
looks pretty good as well...
Once you get used to the ceramic version and especially
if one has a big enough wrist it fits like a glove and
the 5 digit doesn't cut it anymore because the cat's out of
the bag...

So now ...

To date or not to date ?

Please don't tell the misses....
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 12:04 PM   #8
epc2
"TRF" Member
 
epc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: florida
Watch: 116610LV,Pam etc.
Posts: 1,310
116610>114060
epc2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 01:23 PM   #9
Maiden
"TRF" Member
 
Maiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,650
Go for the symmetry of the Sub C.
__________________
Rolex 116613LN
Rolex 16610LN
Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 41mm
Omega Geneve
Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAY2112
Orient Ray 2
Maiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 01:34 PM   #10
BakerView
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: "BG"
Location: PacNW
Watch: that I'm Jonesin 4
Posts: 626
Sub c +1. Personally the 114060 looks the best on your wrist, or maybe it's just a better picture.
BakerView is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 01:44 PM   #11
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,345
116610 for me. They're all great though.
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 02:48 PM   #12
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by FidalgoBay View Post
Sub c +1. Personally the 114060 looks the best on your wrist, or maybe it's just a better picture.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadridv View Post
116610 for me. They're all great though.
It's really tough cause they both have their own appeal...
Another shot of the sub c date .
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 4EF13650-8762-4C05-B1B2-FB26853D65DE.jpeg (209.8 KB, 652 views)
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 02:57 PM   #13
barad55
"TRF" Member
 
barad55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Woodland Hills CA
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 184
Sub c nd is the cleanest imo
barad55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 03:11 PM   #14
peterpl
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
Ceramic sub with date is my pic but the 5 digits are very very comfortable to wear.

If you like a lighter watch the 5 digits are the way to go. Some people do complain that the bracelets are a little tinny though.
peterpl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 03:23 PM   #15
JSMesser
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Jon
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Watch: Yacht Master pt&ss
Posts: 19
The Sub no date!
JSMesser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 04:21 PM   #16
jezza17
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Alex
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: DRSD
Posts: 511
16610 hands down
jezza17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 04:53 PM   #17
juanperez
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: ES
Posts: 4
My vote for 116610LN too

Enviado desde mi H3113 mediante Tapatalk
juanperez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 04:58 PM   #18
JPS
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: UK
Watch: 116500 White&Black
Posts: 1,359
116610ln
JPS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 05:01 PM   #19
Devildog
"TRF" Member
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,653
If they were all brand new the 16610 with SELs would walk it for its more elegant proportions.

Sadly the one in your pic has seen better days.
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR

Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green.
Devildog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 05:37 PM   #20
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by superstarmar View Post
Did a little window shopping today.
There's a local jeweler who specializes in preowned Rolex
here in town for many decades.
Prices are Ok as everyone who is in the business
knows the current market and is capitalizing on it so
no secret there. Just went in to try on the different
references for comparison...

Main thing is they had pretty much all in stock
except a 5 digit Sea Dweller 16600 and 5 digit ND Sub.
So out of these 4 that I've tried on which looks best on my wrist?
Thinking of doing a little shifting around ...

Picture of 5 digit purplish dial Bluesy just for fun...
Sorry can never understand these types of threads shurely the one that looks best on your wrist is the one you like.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 10:35 PM   #21
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devildog View Post
If they were all brand new the 16610 with SELs would walk it for its more elegant proportions.

Sadly the one in your pic has seen better days.
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Sorry can never understand these types of threads shurely the one that looks best on your wrist is the one you like.
Scott, my intentions exactly but it’s not that easy to
find a mint 16610 unpolished with SEL’s one can try on .

Peter , I understand your point but they’re all kind of nice
respectively. I like the 5 digits but am leaning towards
the ceramic for more wrist presence because the
16610 lugs are worn down a bit too much ...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 10:44 PM   #22
GradyPhilpott
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 116710 BLNR
Posts: 34,350
114060
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2018, 12:50 AM   #23
rotiprata
"TRF" Member
 
rotiprata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP
Posts: 183


114060, lean, mean and clean looking.
rotiprata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2018, 01:23 AM   #24
Boaters
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,649
This one for sure
Boaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2018, 07:03 AM   #25
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
What about a late 16610 with Rehaut in like new
condition virtually unpolished serviced not long ago ?
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2018, 05:02 AM   #26
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Seriously thinking of going 5 digit ...
Not one of these though , found a V serial rehaut
Full set in mint condition...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2018, 10:28 AM   #27
ltmgeller
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
ltmgeller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 21,429
Sub C date looks the best to me.
__________________
Oh, look at the time...
Official Member: 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas International GTG 2019
ltmgeller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2018, 10:53 AM   #28
Chilly Coconut
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: South
Posts: 558
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Sorry can never understand these types of threads shurely the one that looks best on your wrist is the one you like.
But isn’t that entirely subjective?
Chilly Coconut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2018, 11:00 AM   #29
BNA/LION
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
BNA/LION's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Larry
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 25,227
Sub C date 116610 LN
__________________

✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ Daytona C 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ NEXT-->?
Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron.
BNA/LION is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2018, 12:49 PM   #30
jps3b
"TRF" Member
 
jps3b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Santa Monica, Ca
Watch: 116619
Posts: 1,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by superstarmar View Post
Seriously thinking of going 5 digit ...
Not one of these though , found a V serial rehaut
Full set in mint condition...


That’s what I would go for. Don’t really like the super case. The clasp and the longevity of the ceramic bezel is nice, but if I was going to have just one, it would be the 16610. Good luck. Here’s mine from 1997



jps3b is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.