ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

sam florio · 24 March 2017, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el-duderino

only one of the new models i like.

Sent from my iphone using tapatalk

x2

vladamir15 · 24 March 2017, 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 77T

It isn't really...I have a Grandfather Clock with moonphase - it was correct for exactly one month. It's first month in our home.

But my point was actually about the poor implementation when all other brands have a better moonphase window.

I see. I agree with you there!

swatty · 25 March 2017, 06:18 PM

Great looking watch, but why not put a proper moonphase window ? It's just a spinning Moon

Corsair66 · 26 March 2017, 12:32 AM

A nice-looking watch, no doubt. I'm still on the fence, though, with respect to the moonphase implementation, as it doesn't show the phases. It may grow on me, though I've got my eye on the Patek 5396r-012 at the moment.

The $25K list price isn't an obstacle at all. I expect to find this piece under $20K from the grey market in fairly short order.

Phudu · 26 March 2017, 12:33 AM

Stunning!

ROGERB · 26 March 2017, 02:27 AM

Like the moon phase over the cheap looking day night indicator...unless you live in a cave in which the watch is pretty much useless since there is no lume. The traditional moon phase window would help this watch. The pointer system for me does not work

Your mileage may vary

R

Osbong · 26 March 2017, 03:18 AM

Wow, I just need to save.

AdaWit711 · 26 March 2017, 03:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Etschell

home run imo

Totally agree

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

kunlun · 26 March 2017, 04:42 AM

I like it, first moonphase in like 50 years from Rolex. It's very nice.

Toivonen · 26 March 2017, 04:44 AM

Not a fan, but not bad at all... the thing is... if i have to spent 25k in this, i can turn straight to 3940

Hollister · 26 March 2017, 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kunlun

I like it, first moonphase in like 50 years from Rolex. It's very nice.

I agree.

superstarmar · 28 March 2017, 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kunlun

I like it, first moonphase in like 50 years from Rolex. It's very nice.

Exactly !!!

jmiicustomz · 28 March 2017, 12:30 PM

Love it!

To know the future is to be trapped by it

hugs · 28 March 2017, 12:35 PM

I think its good for sales that they took out the Cellini on the dial and just have Rolex.

IMO the Cellini branding makes it distanced from the rest of the Rolex range and people may be less inclined to buy it.

Corey Webster · 28 March 2017, 01:43 PM

An actual graphical depiction of the moons visual state is the fundamental quality of a moonphase.

The moon is a visual entity and thus, the appeal comes from seeing the same thing in the sky as the same thing (ideally) on the watch.

25 March 2017, 06:18 PM	#93
swatty 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Peter Location: Sydney Watch: The Game Posts: 17,406	Great looking watch, but why not put a proper moonphase window ? It's just a spinning Moon __________________ 5513, 7928, 1601(gifted to my daughter), 16610LV, 14060, 16610(Random serial),116610, ,79280P, 70330, 25600TB, 792500BM, M56000, 79030B, 25707B/21 (won this special watch),

26 March 2017, 04:44 AM	#100
Toivonen "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Vittorio Location: Italy Watch: SeaDweller Deepsea Posts: 986	Not a fan, but not bad at all... the thing is... if i have to spent 25k in this, i can turn straight to 3940 __________________ No HEV? No Party!!! If you LOVE the Sea Dweller... Join the "BDV" https://www.instagram.com/bandadellavalvola/ https://www.facebook.com/bandadellavalvola/ http://orologi.forumfree.it/?t=75294392

26 March 2017, 12:32 AM	#94
Corsair66 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Location: Clermont, FL Watch: BLRO Posts: 282	A nice-looking watch, no doubt. I'm still on the fence, though, with respect to the moonphase implementation, as it doesn't show the phases. It may grow on me, though I've got my eye on the Patek 5396r-012 at the moment. The $25K list price isn't an obstacle at all. I expect to find this piece under $20K from the grey market in fairly short order.

26 March 2017, 12:33 AM	#95
Phudu "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2017 Location: Ontario Watch: 126600,BLNR Posts: 221	Stunning!

26 March 2017, 02:27 AM	#96
ROGERB "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Roger Location: WHITE ROCK BC Watch: 89 16610, 57 7914, Posts: 897	Like the moon phase over the cheap looking day night indicator...unless you live in a cave in which the watch is pretty much useless since there is no lume. The traditional moon phase window would help this watch. The pointer system for me does not work Your mileage may vary R

26 March 2017, 03:18 AM	#97
Osbong "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Makatiyi Location: California Watch: Rolex, Omega Posts: 220	Wow, I just need to save.

26 March 2017, 04:42 AM	#99
kunlun "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: USA Posts: 1,896	I like it, first moonphase in like 50 years from Rolex. It's very nice.

28 March 2017, 12:30 PM	#103
jmiicustomz "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Real Name: John Location: North Carolina Watch: 1953 pre explorer Posts: 2,758	Love it! To know the future is to be trapped by it

28 March 2017, 12:35 PM	#104
hugs "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: UK bad teeth etc Watch: Rolex and Tudor Posts: 1,001	I think its good for sales that they took out the Cellini on the dial and just have Rolex. IMO the Cellini branding makes it distanced from the rest of the Rolex range and people may be less inclined to buy it.

28 March 2017, 01:43 PM	#105
Corey Webster "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: uk Posts: 3	An actual graphical depiction of the moons visual state is the fundamental quality of a moonphase. The moon is a visual entity and thus, the appeal comes from seeing the same thing in the sky as the same thing (ideally) on the watch.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)