ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 September 2017, 05:01 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 124
|
Is the case of this datejust too wrecked?
Hi there,
I am fairly new to this forum and am wondering if the case of this date just is very worn, or if it is in decent shape? The lugs appear to have lost some of their original shape. Thanks! |
18 September 2017, 07:21 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,157
|
Not wrecked but not pristine obviously
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many |
18 September 2017, 07:33 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,281
|
I've seen worse.
Are you buying it? |
18 September 2017, 08:44 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 2,237
|
Fine looking old DJ. It's bad a polish or two but it certainly isn't trashed.
|
18 September 2017, 08:58 PM | #5 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 44,718
|
I think it look fine. Just older with some wear.
|
18 September 2017, 09:10 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 124
|
Thank you for the feedback everyone! I am thinking of buying this watch.
|
18 September 2017, 11:09 PM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,059
|
It's ok
|
18 September 2017, 11:15 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Pete
Location: Toronto, Canada
Watch: 1016.
Posts: 687
|
You'll see a lot worse than that in terms of polished lugs. I would not hesitate if I wanted to buy, those can be cleaned up and frankly don't look too bad to me as-is.
The most troubling thing in those pictures is that raggedy thumbnail IMO. Come on man, get a pair of nail clippers! |
18 September 2017, 11:39 PM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Willy
Location: AU, SG, MY
Posts: 1,248
|
Quote:
These vintage pieces from the 1970s are svelte and slimline, don't compare it to modern versions with obese bloated lugs. I prefer looking at Elvis in his early prime |
|
19 September 2017, 02:25 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,973
|
I don't think that watch has ever been polished. The photos aren't great but the lines from the polish to the satin on the lugs would cut your finger...and I don't see ANY rounding of the flutes...just looks like somebody wore it.
|
19 September 2017, 01:54 PM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,657
|
Buy it at the 'right' price - that will come up a treat with a professional polish.
Will almost certainly need a Service as well as it's appearance suggests it has not seen an RSC (Rolex Service Centre) recently. You will need to factor the cost of the Service in to your offer. What's the 'right' price? I'll leave that to more experienced people here.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch. Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..." |
20 September 2017, 10:06 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 124
|
Thank you everyone for the feedback! I think I will purchase this watch if I can get it for less than $3000 USD.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.