ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 September 2017, 01:13 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: CT
Posts: 62
|
Explorer vs Oyster Perpetual for Skinny Wrists
I'm an adult male with skinny wrists (6.33") who very much wants to buy the 39mm Explorer (214270) but recently have come to view the plain-vanilla 36mm Oyster Perpetual (116000) as arguably a better "successor" to the old 36mm Explorer.
They both have the same movement (3130), both are made of the same 904L steel. Their dials are almost the same. No date complication. I think the Explorer retails for about $6,500 and the OP for about $5,400. So while I very much am drawn to the Explorer's "heritage", given the near-equivalency in terms of design, materials and movement, the smaller diameter (arguably better for my skinny wrists), and cheaper price, should I just go with the 36mm 116000 as an almost-but-not-quite Explorer? Interested to hear opinions. |
25 September 2017, 03:05 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Nick
Location: YUL
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,936
|
Yes.
The 214270 is foolishly big compared to the previous 36mm version, which I obviously prefer. It probably won't fit you well.
__________________
Nick _________________________________________ 14060M - 114200 - 114270 - 214270 - 16710BLRO - 16570 - 3570.50 - Cartier Tank Solo - Cartier Tank Française ‘Yearling’ - CWC Navy Diver |
25 September 2017, 03:17 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 673
|
Quote:
And I think the use of Mercedes hands and the latest dial having lumed arabics, gives the Explorer a substantially different vibe compared to the Oyster Perpetual. And no it will not be too big...but that all boils down to preference didn't it? On my 6" wrist Sent from my F8132 using Tapatalk |
|
25 September 2017, 03:39 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 893
|
Sounds to me like you want the Exp and are trying to talk yourself out of it.
Re $: when the cost of a watch is so ridiculously high, don't let $1,000 sway your decision. |
25 September 2017, 03:41 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
Explorer 114270 36mm secondhand
|
25 September 2017, 03:14 PM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Aaron
Location: WA
Posts: 772
|
I love the grape 36mm OP, but the new explorer was too tough to pass up
|
25 September 2017, 09:19 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Tony
Location: Loughton UK
Watch: 16610LV no Rehault
Posts: 369
|
OP 116000 Blue 3-6-9 Arabic Dial
The Oyster Perpetual is the watch that the Explorer was derived from - historically and chronologically (Indeed all Explorers still have the line on the dial beneath the coronet 'OYSTER PERPETUAL'), I own Explorers 14270 & 114270 and this OP 36 (was also available with silver dial), which for legibility reasons I had the hands swapped for a genuine Rolex 'mercedes' set.... it is now my daily wearer (I've given the Explorers to my daughters) I did look at the 214270 when it first came out, but was not impressed so I purchased the OP instead and have not regretted a minute since (no pun intended!).
In my opinion the OP and the 36 Explorer are virtually the same watch (on the inside at least) and I still like all 3. |
25 September 2017, 09:49 PM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,821
|
Quote:
I love that look with the hands! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter |
|
25 September 2017, 09:58 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Ken
Location: Europa
Watch: 216570
Posts: 693
|
Have you tried them on?
__________________
"My center is yielding, my right is retreating. Excellent situation, I am attacking" Ferdinand Foch |
26 September 2017, 12:23 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,443
|
I would go Explorer...plus you get the easy link clasp with it.
|
26 September 2017, 01:35 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,456
|
|
26 September 2017, 01:36 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,456
|
Sorry don’t know what happened with the link. I meant the 36mm Explorer.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
1 October 2017, 12:49 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: CT
Posts: 62
|
Thanks, everyone, I appreciate the feedback. I want to elaborate that I tried on an Explorer at the AD, and it appeared to sit well on the wrist.
Just to "flesh out" (excuse the pun) my dilemma, I've attached two wrist shots. The Seiko is 38mm and the Victorinox is 40mm. Feel free to opine openly on whether the 39mm Explorer is suitable to a skinny-wrist guy like me. Also curious whether I could pull off a 40mm model like the Sub or GMT. |
2 October 2017, 04:04 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: CT
Posts: 62
|
and if anyone knows where I can find a pre-owned 36mm Explorer, please shoot me a message
|
2 October 2017, 05:23 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
36mm Explorer 14270 or 114270 both are your best choice
|
2 October 2017, 06:21 AM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,054
|
Jacek is a forum member here. Try sending him a PM or visit HQ Milton in where he is a partner or co-owner I believe. There are several Explorers there for sale right now.
|
2 October 2017, 09:39 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: China
Posts: 220
|
|
2 October 2017, 09:56 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Ontario
Watch: Explorer 214270
Posts: 177
|
The Victorinox looks quite long lug to lug. Looks too big. The Seiko looks borderline to me. Not sure how lug to lug of 39 mm Explorer compares to those two but that may be more important than dial size.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
2 October 2017, 10:31 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,842
|
I have a somewhat flat 6" wrist.
I've owned a 36mm Omega, a 39mm Explorer I, the sub-c, and currently I have a gmt-2c. The 36mm felt small- now mind you this years before I was made aware of the Panerai and the whole big watch movement. All the Rolexes fit fine. No need to remove a permanent link. In terms of fit: 1) sub-c due to the glide lock. But it was a bit tall and and had some trouble getting over some dress shirt cuffs. It looks like a big watch, due to the fat lugs, I liked it. 2) Explorer I- it fit fine, no issues. But the watch looked bigger than the two because the dial was bigger- no big ceramic bezel. 3) GMT-2c- fits fine, but it can lean toward the 12 o'clock position slightly. But not a deal breaker. My rule is if the lugs hang over the edges of your wrists like that Victorinox, then game over. The seiko looks fine. I don't wear anything over 40mm (in fact I don't even look at them) and I'm always open to smaller sizes, down to 36mm. I don't buy anything unless I try it on. If it were me, it's Explorer all day, everyday. I love the arabic numerals, the Mercedes hands. But if you want color, OP can't be beat. |
2 October 2017, 11:38 AM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Batavia
Posts: 183
|
Isn't oyster perpetual on every Rolex but the celllini?
|
2 October 2017, 09:39 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: key west
Watch: 16610
Posts: 811
|
6.25" wrist here. I had a 44mm Breitling for little while but ultimately got rid of it because it felt too large.
As per your question, if the explorer is what you want, I think it'll look perfect in your size wrist. But a 36mm would look perfect too! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
2 October 2017, 11:42 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Lee
Location: Kentucky
Watch: SWISS
Posts: 1,521
|
The explorer would be my choice. By all means, 39mm will not be too large for your wrist. After a few days wearing a 39mm piece, you'll think the 36 is too small. Our minds eye adjusts very quickly.
|
2 October 2017, 11:51 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Port St. Lucie
Posts: 142
|
It sounds like you really want the Oyster.
If i were you, I would just go with my gut. |
3 October 2017, 12:02 AM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jon
Location: Bay Area
Watch: Rolex GMT BLNR
Posts: 1,339
|
Quote:
The gmt is quite reasonable in that respect and will look great. I don’t know my wrist size but know it’s small. I’ll post pix from my laptop later this morning. Of my 35mm SS/PL Yachtmaster and my 40mm GMT Batman BLNR. |
|
3 October 2017, 12:14 AM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,924
|
Quote:
From what you've said though, the Explorer might be more your bag.
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737 "Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
|
|
3 October 2017, 12:42 AM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
|
OP, you will have no issue with the 39 mm Explorer, which will “wear” smaller than the Seiko and Victorinox you currently own.
|
3 October 2017, 01:34 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 1,262
|
Explorer all the way.
|
26 October 2017, 02:55 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: CT
Posts: 62
|
thanks for the input, everyone, I've read (and re-read) all the comments, and it's been helpful.
Above I posted a wrist shot of my Seiko. While it looks relatively big in that photo, it looks much better in the field. I don't know why; optical voodoo I guess. But my question is this: I've done some further research. The Seiko is 38mm case with 46mm lug-to-lug, whereas the 214270 Explorer is 39mm case with 47mm case. So, since I am reasonably satisfied that the Seiko is not "too big" for me, I feel confident that I'll find the Explorer suitably well-sized for my wrist. What I can't find however is the lug-to-lug measurement of the 36mm Oyster Perpetual, so if someone knows that, it would be helpful info to brood over prior to my trip next week to the AD. Again, it's a two-horse race between the 39mm 214270 Explorer and the 36mm OP. Aesthetically I prefer the Explorer, but almost certainly the 36mm (from a fit perspective) would better suit my wrist. |
26 October 2017, 03:02 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Kristofer
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: my feet.
Posts: 2,364
|
Don't settle. If you're thinking of settling...Don't. Happy Hunting
I vote EXP.
__________________
No sticker left behind. "Better three hours too soon, than a minute too late." "All we have to do is decide what to do with the time that is given to us." ref. 116520 Daytona - 10/2014 |
26 October 2017, 03:12 AM | #30 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Faz
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: like'em all
Posts: 4,655
|
Quote:
A good friend of mine, a big guy, has smaller wrists and was worried about a larger size of the Explorer on his wrists. I basically talked him into buying a Rolex (see thread >>HERE<< ) and he has not been happier since. The watch looks awesome on his hand, and when we go out for lunch, I am very satisfied to see that watch on his wrist. (and more importantly, so is he!) FYI, I am more of a conservative when it comes to larger size watches and find some of the pictures people post here to be on the funny side (as in the watch is WAY too big for them and they are still happy with it), but that is fine for them, whatever rocks their boat I guess. And I am suggesting that you should not just zoom in to the pictures of watch on your wrist and you have to look at how the watch fits into the overall package.
__________________
-Faz Instagram @fazmoto |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.