ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Chasseur · 9 October 2015, 03:39 PM

No problem
I just wanted to give add information

cajuntiger · 9 October 2015, 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chasseur

No problem
I just wanted to give add information

gotcha...love your second image!!

mluther · 9 October 2015, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cajuntiger

a few more shots from the Q...love this camera.

Hands down some of the nicest shots I've seen for a while - have been resisting the Leica rabbit hole, but liking the idea of the Q more and more.....

Daytonaman799 · 10 October 2015, 09:39 AM

Does a 16600 COMEX qualify as vintage now?

themaninblack · 10 October 2015, 11:08 AM

Loving the M-P 240, my first digital Leica, but I already had lenses and the M9 just never cut it so glad I waited. The Q is an obvious step for Leica, had a good play with one and it's a real modern camera from Leica with all the bells and whistles but I would find the fixed 28 hard to live with and I love the M because it's a rangefinder and it is still true to it's lineage. The Q looks much like a classic Leica but is a world apart from the M. In reality though I think if they had gone for an interchangeable lens camera with the Q it would kill the M line and they didn't want that to happen.

joe100 · 10 October 2015, 11:55 AM

I just bought my first Leica today. Super excited of course

Hairdude1 · 10 October 2015, 12:40 PM

Awesome pictures!

Chasseur · 10 October 2015, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by themaninblack

Loving the M-P 240, my first digital Leica, but I already had lenses and the M9 just never cut it so glad I waited. The Q is an obvious step for Leica, had a good play with one and it's a real modern camera from Leica with all the bells and whistles but I would find the fixed 28 hard to live with and I love the M because it's a rangefinder and it is still true to it's lineage. The Q looks much like a classic Leica but is a world apart from the M. In reality though I think if they had gone for an interchangeable lens camera with the Q it would kill the M line and they didn't want that to happen.

Totally agree

PoderEsBueno · 10 October 2015, 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chasseur

Quote:

Originally Posted by mtl514

Very nice shots, I love my Q, take all my watch pics with it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cajuntiger

a few more shots from the Q...love this camera.

Great shots - love to see more

themaninblack · 14 March 2016, 08:22 PM

So I succumbed to the Leica Q. It's a wonderful camera, so far just used it on a short holiday trip and enjoyed using it immensely. Great weight and size and just lovely optics as you would expect. Must say pretty handy to have AF but the EVF is fantastic for manual focus, best I have used. Will have a good play with the macro functions and some watch subjects in the next few days.

Couldn't believe they tried to can it on DigitalRev TV and then in another review tried to sing the praises of the ridiculous new M262 which is USD$5200 (body only) for a economy made dumbed down feautureless version of the M240. Compared to M cameras the Summilux lens on the Q alone makes it worthwhile and the body comes as a free bonus!

motoikkyu · 15 March 2016, 12:34 AM

Beautiful photos! Thank you so much for posting, gives me something to "shoot" for: my own images are so UGLY!

Boaters · 15 March 2016, 01:44 AM

Very very nice ..

10 October 2015, 11:55 AM	#36
joe100 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Joe Location: New Mexico Watch: Explorer Posts: 12,753	I just bought my first Leica today. Super excited of course __________________ It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982-

10 October 2015, 12:40 PM	#37
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156	Awesome pictures! __________________ Instagram: @Hairdude Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238 16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped) Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018

15 March 2016, 12:34 AM	#41
motoikkyu 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: PRJ Posts: 1,731	Beautiful photos! Thank you so much for posting, gives me something to "shoot" for: my own images are so UGLY! __________________ "Do you like Breitling?" "I don't know, really, I've never been Breitled"

9 October 2015, 03:39 PM	#31
Chasseur "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: John Location: Somewhere Posts: 1,077	No problem I just wanted to give add information

10 October 2015, 09:39 AM	#34
Daytonaman799 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: NYC/South Fl Watch: Rolex, Patek Posts: 3,507	Does a 16600 COMEX qualify as vintage now?

10 October 2015, 11:08 AM	#35
themaninblack "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Location: Australia Posts: 1,058	Loving the M-P 240, my first digital Leica, but I already had lenses and the M9 just never cut it so glad I waited. The Q is an obvious step for Leica, had a good play with one and it's a real modern camera from Leica with all the bells and whistles but I would find the fixed 28 hard to live with and I love the M because it's a rangefinder and it is still true to it's lineage. The Q looks much like a classic Leica but is a world apart from the M. In reality though I think if they had gone for an interchangeable lens camera with the Q it would kill the M line and they didn't want that to happen.

14 March 2016, 08:22 PM	#40
themaninblack "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Location: Australia Posts: 1,058	So I succumbed to the Leica Q. It's a wonderful camera, so far just used it on a short holiday trip and enjoyed using it immensely. Great weight and size and just lovely optics as you would expect. Must say pretty handy to have AF but the EVF is fantastic for manual focus, best I have used. Will have a good play with the macro functions and some watch subjects in the next few days. Couldn't believe they tried to can it on DigitalRev TV and then in another review tried to sing the praises of the ridiculous new M262 which is USD$5200 (body only) for a economy made dumbed down feautureless version of the M240. Compared to M cameras the Summilux lens on the Q alone makes it worthwhile and the body comes as a free bonus!

15 March 2016, 01:44 AM	#42
Boaters 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2015 Real Name: Mike Location: Pacific Northwest Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD Posts: 10,649	Very very nice ..

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)