The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Patek Philippe Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 September 2017, 12:50 AM   #1
Socal to az
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Arizona
Posts: 791
I support Patek's direction 100%

I don't want 33 mm men's watches

I don't want text that I need a magnifying glass to read

I don't want dated dials and numerals

I don't want watches so thin that I can use them to slice meat


Stop with the "I hate the new Patek" posts. We get it. You want small thin watches from the 70s. Some of us like the newer modern pieces.


Bring on my 5522!!!!

Carry on.
Socal to az is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 12:57 AM   #2
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
i like variety. Some big, some small, some complicated, some simple.

there is something for everyone's taste, you would think.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 01:04 AM   #3
RussW
"TRF" Member
 
RussW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: England
Watch: 5990
Posts: 3,339
Agree. I've supported Patek's current direction for quite some time now. There are many, many pieces in the current collection I would love to own. I couldn't have said that 20 years ago.
RussW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 01:06 AM   #4
The B
"TRF" Member
 
The B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 221
If it was not for the direction taken in the last 12 years (or so) I certainly would not be into Patek as deep as I am.
The B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 01:29 AM   #5
Tony64
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by Socal to az View Post
I don't want 33 mm men's watches

I don't want text that I need a magnifying glass to read

I don't want dated dials and numerals

I don't want watches so thin that I can use them to slice meat


Stop with the "I hate the new Patek" posts. We get it. You want small thin watches from the 70s. Some of us like the newer modern pieces.


Bring on my 5522!!!!

Carry on.

Are these the only two choices? 33mm meat slicers or modern monstrosities?

How about some discreet 36-37mm properly proportioned dress watches with a movement you're not so ashamed to use a sapphire caseback?

Refinement and discretion are what first brought me to Patek. The current lineup leaves me uninspired.

Love the brand. Not in love with the direction. Time will tell.

Tony64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 01:38 AM   #6
KarlS
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
I only came into the brand recently when it appeared to be less like my grandfathers watch choice. I like the direction but saying that there is something for everyone and I can't say tgat about many brands.
KarlS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 01:50 AM   #7
Tony64
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlS View Post
I only came into the brand recently when it appeared to be less like my grandfathers watch choice. I like the direction but saying that there is something for everyone and I can't say tgat about many brands.
Funny, cuz that's precisely what I liked about the brand! (My grandfather had great taste!)

Different strokes, different folks.
Tony64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 02:09 AM   #8
KarlS
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
Nice Martin and a great hotel as well
KarlS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 02:20 AM   #9
thomaspp
"TRF" Member
 
thomaspp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,136
I like both, the old and the new. I might be in the minority here but I think dressier watches (ACs, PCs, calatravas, etc) should be under 40mm while sports watches are fine at 40mm/42mm. My collection is now primarily vintage rolex so going from those to patek gives me a different perspective I guess.

Some of the most iconic patek are on the smaller side (1518, 2499, 3970, 5004, 2526 and 3940) but turning up your nose based on size alone is a big mistake if you ask me.
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous
thomaspp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 02:31 AM   #10
martinr
"TRF" Member
 
martinr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,099
For me the size issue is about what looks best on me. Even though I have a smaller wrist larger watches look better on me in my opinion, it might have to do with hand size. I like all the watches Thomas mentioned but I used to wear a 36mm watch for years and it started looking really small compared to what was popular. I got into Rolex 40mm and then gravitated to AP and Patek. Now maybe a 39mm AP Jumbo would be as small as I'd want to wear.
martinr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 02:47 AM   #11
thomaspp
"TRF" Member
 
thomaspp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by martinr View Post
For me the size issue is about what looks best on me. Even though I have a smaller wrist larger watches look better on me in my opinion, it might have to do with hand size. I like all the watches Thomas mentioned but I used to wear a 36mm watch for years and it started looking really small compared to what was popular. I got into Rolex 40mm and then gravitated to AP and Patek. Now maybe a 39mm AP Jumbo would be as small as I'd want to wear.
i hear you. I have small wrists admittedly. You know what they say? Small wrist, big.... just kidding.

be well
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous
thomaspp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 02:58 AM   #12
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by thomaspp View Post
... I have small wrists admittedly. You know what they say? Small wrist, big....
wishlist?
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 03:14 AM   #13
luvan12
"TRF" Member
 
luvan12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Port St. Lucie
Posts: 142
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
i like variety. Some big, some small, some complicated, some simple.

there is something for everyone's taste, you would think.

Agreed. Variety is key in life.
luvan12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 03:29 AM   #14
WatchingAustin
"TRF" Member
 
WatchingAustin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: TX
Watch: iwatch
Posts: 376
Funny hearing all of the biases. My grandpa couldn't afford a watch, let alone a Patek. Guess I am lucky to not have formed that bias.

IMO I prefer the smaller watches as I feel it looks better on my wrist due to my small wrist. I assume you like the larger watches for the same reason. I'm glad Patek has both.
WatchingAustin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 03:40 AM   #15
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,220
I wouldn't wear a watch much under 40mm any more myself, but I think of Patek as a smaller, slimmer watch brand than say AP, Lange and RM generally where I like them to fill out my wrists more. All of them have a place in anyone's collection, variety is life's spice.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 03:44 AM   #16
carava501
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Tampa
Posts: 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by Socal to az View Post
I don't want 33 mm men's watches

I don't want text that I need a magnifying glass to read

I don't want dated dials and numerals

I don't want watches so thin that I can use them to slice meat


Stop with the "I hate the new Patek" posts. We get it. You want small thin watches from the 70s. Some of us like the newer modern pieces.


Bring on my 5522!!!!

Carry on.

I get what your trying to say but all watches matter and you should learn to love all types of watches.
carava501 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 03:45 AM   #17
Tay821
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 913
Quote:
Originally Posted by martinr View Post


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
That's awesome. Lucky you're able to do that!
Tay821 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 05:02 AM   #18
Tony64
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tay821 View Post
That's awesome. Lucky you're able to do that!
I'm not sure how much of it is luck, as it is the first 4 words of the invite.
Tony64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 05:46 AM   #19
Vipes
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,835
Martin, take lot of pics! Enjoy the trip.
Vipes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 06:18 AM   #20
Tay821
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 913
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony64 View Post
I'm not sure how much of it is luck, as it is the first 4 words of the invite.


I think everyone knows what I meant there


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tay821 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 06:35 AM   #21
Hollister
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony64 View Post
Are these the only two choices? 33mm meat slicers or modern monstrosities?

How about some discreet 36-37mm properly proportioned dress watches with a movement you're not so ashamed to use a sapphire caseback?

Refinement and discretion are what first brought me to Patek. The current lineup leaves me uninspired.

Love the brand. Not in love with the direction. Time will tell.

Agreed, also rumours of QC issues and very, very long service turnaround. I have a 39mm and a 40mm, plenty big enough for my eyesight.

Are Patek aiming to take on the Hublot market, I wonder? Cheers.
Hollister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 06:41 AM   #22
Arclight
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 577
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollister View Post
Are Patek aiming to take on the Hublot market, I wonder? Cheers.
LOL! God I hope not!
Arclight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 07:09 AM   #23
dmash
"TRF" Member
 
dmash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 5,912
Surely you guys who are saying you wouldn't want to wear under 40mm are referring to strictly sport watches? IMO 37-38mm is the sweet spot for leather strapped dress pieces and 40-42mm is the best for metal or rubber strapped sport pieces. A 40mm Calatrava would look absolutely horrible.

and while on this subject, why is PP releasing 42mm pieces but still thinks the small 215 is sufficient in the Calatrava? Seems like they should be upgrading this and adding a see through caseback, or are they going to hold on to historic value with the Calatrava range?
dmash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 07:14 AM   #24
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
^
You speak as though everyone has the same mindset, wrist shape and size, and preferences.
What used to be the done thing many decades ago doesn’t mean it must remain ever so.
If I wore anything smaller than 40mm, especially on a narrow leather strap, it’d be like a rhinoceros with a pimple on its arse!
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 07:20 AM   #25
RussW
"TRF" Member
 
RussW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: England
Watch: 5990
Posts: 3,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmash View Post
Surely you guys who are saying you wouldn't want to wear under 40mm are referring to strictly sport watches? IMO 37-38mm is the sweet spot for leather strapped dress pieces and 40-42mm is the best for metal or rubber strapped sport pieces. A 40mm Calatrava would look absolutely horrible.
Agree that certain watches work best at particular sizes. For me, upsizing the Royal Oak and Royal Oak chrono didn't work as well as the 39mm size, as an example. I agree with you on the Calatrava (excluding the 5524 and 5522 which aren't really calatravas). I think the key for Patek is designing watches that do work at 40mm and above, but they don't have to be sport watches. The 5905 is I think a great recent example, along with the pilot watches.
RussW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 09:30 AM   #26
Starguru
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: VA
Posts: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by jon_jon View Post
Enjoy the factory tour, Martin! It is quite an experience


How do you arrange one of those trips? What do they run?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Starguru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 09:56 AM   #27
ap1
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,035
Beat me to it. I wanted to hang with Martin.
ap1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 12:01 PM   #28
jon_jon
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 4,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starguru View Post
How do you arrange one of those trips? What do they run?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The factory tour is at the invitation of your Patek AD. It is an all expense paid trip to Geneva, with business class flights to/from Geneva, a stay at the Mandarin Oriental Hotel, a tour of the factory and museum as well as an opportunity to listen to minute repeaters and handle the Grandmaster Chime. Of course a strong relationship with an AD is usually a pre-requisite for being invited to the factory tour, although there are always exceptions.

Some smaller ADs with a limited number of collectors will also invite spouses. The large ADs usually are able to only accommodate the watch collectors.
jon_jon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 12:15 PM   #29
Hairdude1
"TRF" Member
 
Hairdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by Socal to az View Post
I don't want 33 mm men's watches

I don't want text that I need a magnifying glass to read

I don't want dated dials and numerals

I don't want watches so thin that I can use them to slice meat


Stop with the "I hate the new Patek" posts. We get it. You want small thin watches from the 70s. Some of us like the newer modern pieces.


Bring on my 5522!!!!

Carry on.
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude
Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238

16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped)
Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018
Hairdude1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2017, 12:26 PM   #30
Starguru
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: VA
Posts: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by jon_jon View Post
The factory tour is at the invitation of your Patek AD. It is an all expense paid trip to Geneva, with business class flights to/from Geneva, a stay at the Mandarin Oriental Hotel, a tour of the factory and museum as well as an opportunity to listen to minute repeaters and handle the Grandmaster Chime. Of course a strong relationship with an AD is usually a pre-requisite for being invited to the factory tour, although there are always exceptions.

Some smaller ADs with a limited number of collectors will also invite spouses. The large ADs usually are able to only accommodate the watch collectors.


Thank you for the reply. I wonder is patek paying for this or is the AD?

I have a relationship with an AD and want so much to buy a Patek, but I can't find a piece that speaks to me. The 5170 comes close but the limit of 30 minutes for the chronograph bothers me. Maybe if Patek produced something like a 5160 but thinner, perhaps by having a manual wind(eliminating the thickness that comes with the rotor)....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Starguru is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.