ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 September 2017, 12:50 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Arizona
Posts: 791
|
I support Patek's direction 100%
I don't want 33 mm men's watches
I don't want text that I need a magnifying glass to read I don't want dated dials and numerals I don't want watches so thin that I can use them to slice meat Stop with the "I hate the new Patek" posts. We get it. You want small thin watches from the 70s. Some of us like the newer modern pieces. Bring on my 5522!!!! Carry on. |
15 September 2017, 12:57 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
|
i like variety. Some big, some small, some complicated, some simple.
there is something for everyone's taste, you would think.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition) |
15 September 2017, 01:04 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: England
Watch: 5990
Posts: 3,339
|
Agree. I've supported Patek's current direction for quite some time now. There are many, many pieces in the current collection I would love to own. I couldn't have said that 20 years ago.
|
15 September 2017, 01:06 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 221
|
If it was not for the direction taken in the last 12 years (or so) I certainly would not be into Patek as deep as I am.
|
15 September 2017, 01:29 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,796
|
Quote:
Are these the only two choices? 33mm meat slicers or modern monstrosities? How about some discreet 36-37mm properly proportioned dress watches with a movement you're not so ashamed to use a sapphire caseback? Refinement and discretion are what first brought me to Patek. The current lineup leaves me uninspired. Love the brand. Not in love with the direction. Time will tell. |
|
15 September 2017, 01:38 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
|
I only came into the brand recently when it appeared to be less like my grandfathers watch choice. I like the direction but saying that there is something for everyone and I can't say tgat about many brands.
|
15 September 2017, 01:50 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,796
|
Quote:
Different strokes, different folks. |
|
15 September 2017, 02:09 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
|
Nice Martin and a great hotel as well
|
15 September 2017, 02:20 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,136
|
I like both, the old and the new. I might be in the minority here but I think dressier watches (ACs, PCs, calatravas, etc) should be under 40mm while sports watches are fine at 40mm/42mm. My collection is now primarily vintage rolex so going from those to patek gives me a different perspective I guess.
Some of the most iconic patek are on the smaller side (1518, 2499, 3970, 5004, 2526 and 3940) but turning up your nose based on size alone is a big mistake if you ask me.
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
15 September 2017, 02:31 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,099
|
For me the size issue is about what looks best on me. Even though I have a smaller wrist larger watches look better on me in my opinion, it might have to do with hand size. I like all the watches Thomas mentioned but I used to wear a 36mm watch for years and it started looking really small compared to what was popular. I got into Rolex 40mm and then gravitated to AP and Patek. Now maybe a 39mm AP Jumbo would be as small as I'd want to wear.
|
15 September 2017, 02:47 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,136
|
Quote:
be well
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
|
15 September 2017, 02:58 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
|
|
15 September 2017, 03:14 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Port St. Lucie
Posts: 142
|
|
15 September 2017, 03:29 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: TX
Watch: iwatch
Posts: 376
|
Funny hearing all of the biases. My grandpa couldn't afford a watch, let alone a Patek. Guess I am lucky to not have formed that bias.
IMO I prefer the smaller watches as I feel it looks better on my wrist due to my small wrist. I assume you like the larger watches for the same reason. I'm glad Patek has both. |
15 September 2017, 03:40 AM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,220
|
I wouldn't wear a watch much under 40mm any more myself, but I think of Patek as a smaller, slimmer watch brand than say AP, Lange and RM generally where I like them to fill out my wrists more. All of them have a place in anyone's collection, variety is life's spice.
|
15 September 2017, 03:44 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Tampa
Posts: 86
|
Quote:
I get what your trying to say but all watches matter and you should learn to love all types of watches. |
|
15 September 2017, 03:45 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 913
|
|
15 September 2017, 05:02 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,796
|
|
15 September 2017, 05:46 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,835
|
Martin, take lot of pics! Enjoy the trip.
|
15 September 2017, 06:18 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 913
|
|
15 September 2017, 06:35 AM | #21 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
|
Quote:
Are Patek aiming to take on the Hublot market, I wonder? Cheers. |
|
15 September 2017, 06:41 AM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 577
|
|
15 September 2017, 07:09 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 5,912
|
Surely you guys who are saying you wouldn't want to wear under 40mm are referring to strictly sport watches? IMO 37-38mm is the sweet spot for leather strapped dress pieces and 40-42mm is the best for metal or rubber strapped sport pieces. A 40mm Calatrava would look absolutely horrible.
and while on this subject, why is PP releasing 42mm pieces but still thinks the small 215 is sufficient in the Calatrava? Seems like they should be upgrading this and adding a see through caseback, or are they going to hold on to historic value with the Calatrava range? |
15 September 2017, 07:14 AM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
|
^
You speak as though everyone has the same mindset, wrist shape and size, and preferences. What used to be the done thing many decades ago doesn’t mean it must remain ever so. If I wore anything smaller than 40mm, especially on a narrow leather strap, it’d be like a rhinoceros with a pimple on its arse! |
15 September 2017, 07:20 AM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: England
Watch: 5990
Posts: 3,339
|
Quote:
|
|
15 September 2017, 09:30 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: VA
Posts: 238
|
|
15 September 2017, 09:56 AM | #27 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,035
|
Beat me to it. I wanted to hang with Martin.
|
15 September 2017, 12:01 PM | #28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 4,341
|
Quote:
Some smaller ADs with a limited number of collectors will also invite spouses. The large ADs usually are able to only accommodate the watch collectors. |
|
15 September 2017, 12:15 PM | #29 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
Quote:
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238 16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped) Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018 |
|
15 September 2017, 12:26 PM | #30 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: VA
Posts: 238
|
Quote:
Thank you for the reply. I wonder is patek paying for this or is the AD? I have a relationship with an AD and want so much to buy a Patek, but I can't find a piece that speaks to me. The 5170 comes close but the limit of 30 minutes for the chronograph bothers me. Maybe if Patek produced something like a 5160 but thinner, perhaps by having a manual wind(eliminating the thickness that comes with the rotor).... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.