ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
1 August 2013, 10:23 AM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 32,458
|
305 vs 389
So I'm seriously wanting a 389 and currently own a 305.
Looking for some outside feedback on both models. Would probably flip the the 305 if I go for the 389. Both 47mm titanium Subs. 305: all titanium, sapphire caseback, dot hour markers.. 389: titanium case with ceramic inlay bezel, solid Ti caseback, hash hour markers, antimagnetic. Opinions appreciated..... |
1 August 2013, 10:27 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,150
|
389 is very cool but if its significantly more expensive than the 305 I'd stay put.
|
1 August 2013, 10:31 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Andy
Location: Florida USA
Watch: PAM 422 GMTIIC
Posts: 868
|
Although I wish the 389 had a clear caseback it still would be the winner for me. The ceramic bezel gives the 389 great contrast, wrist presence and imho sets it apart from all other panerai subs, none of which except the 389 have ever impressed me. Bronzo included.
See Nishants thread where he posted awesome pics of his 389. Its a gorgeous PAM. |
1 August 2013, 10:56 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,873
|
Travis, get the 389.
|
1 August 2013, 11:36 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 476
|
The 389 may be my 2nd PAM. It's the perfect modern expression of the historical Panerai "mission" IMHO.
|
1 August 2013, 12:42 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: san francisco
Watch: gmt2c pam372
Posts: 842
|
I like most things about the 389 more...aside from the changes to the dial. I prefer the dot hour markers over the batons...
Either way, I think what this thread needs is some pictures of the two watches :-) |
1 August 2013, 12:49 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 2,103
|
389 for me, if my wrist could handle it.
|
1 August 2013, 12:58 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Nishant T.
Location: DC Area
Watch: JLC NS Chrono GMT
Posts: 779
|
Keep the 305. Save for the 389.
They can both easily coexist and I just love em both. 389, a bit more :) |
1 August 2013, 01:05 PM | #9 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,620
|
It's a lot to give up (305, more money) for a sliver of ceramic, but if the heart wants what it wants....
|
1 August 2013, 02:46 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,245
|
i'd go for 389 if you've already seen one in person , which is amazing
|
1 August 2013, 04:15 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Borneo
Posts: 247
|
I like the 389 just a tad better than the 305. In my opinion, I'd say save up for the 389 and keep the 305. I really think the two subs makes a good pair.
Good luck! |
1 August 2013, 10:37 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
|
389 on the secondary market would be a good pickup...
__________________
too much into watches... |
1 August 2013, 10:53 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Randy
Location: Ohio
Watch: AP, Rolex, Panerai
Posts: 1,241
|
389 for sure, the ceramic bezel is sweet!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.