ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 January 2018, 07:25 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Houston
Posts: 5
|
1988 5513 vs 168000 vs 16610
Hi, I'm interested in a 1988 (birth year) sub. I've done some research on the various models available from the time period but would love to here others opinions on which model I should try to get and why.
I'd plan for this watch to be in my regular rotation and thus be worn on a weekly basis. Thanks for your help and opinions. |
20 January 2018, 07:30 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: NY
Posts: 2,469
|
I would be interested to hear everyone's take on this topic regarding those references.
__________________
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction. - Albert Einstein |
20 January 2018, 08:11 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,652
|
I like all three so can't help much.
|
20 January 2018, 09:03 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
|
First question, do you prefer date or no-date?
|
20 January 2018, 10:27 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
|
How about a 666 Sea Dweller???
|
20 January 2018, 10:56 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,733
|
|
20 January 2018, 11:22 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,586
|
5513, last of the plastic domes !
__________________
”When citizens learn to vote themselves the treasury, they limit prosperity.” |
20 January 2018, 11:43 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Las Vegas NV
Watch: 14060M COSC
Posts: 1,329
|
The 5513 is a prime example of a collectable and truly notable model. The other two models you mention are not in the same category as the 5513.
|
20 January 2018, 11:55 AM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,586
|
Transitional 5513 with perfectly matching aged Tritium is hard to resist.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
”When citizens learn to vote themselves the treasury, they limit prosperity.” |
20 January 2018, 09:55 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,301
|
^ now that is a fine example of a perfect 5513. Congratulations.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
At my age now ... I have SEEN everything, I have HEARD everything, I have even DONE everything, I just don't REMEMBER everything. |
20 January 2018, 11:32 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 2,204
|
5513 for classic clean look and plexiglass
|
21 January 2018, 12:16 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Tom
Location: Sarasota, FL
Watch: 5513, SD4K
Posts: 462
|
Perhaps the 16610 and here is why, the R serial was the "birth" year of the 16610, which was in the '87-88 timeframe.
|
21 January 2018, 04:44 AM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 6,174
|
|
22 January 2018, 06:00 AM | #14 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Houston
Posts: 5
|
Thanks everyone for your replies. DLRIDES that 5513 is really good looking.
I don't have a strong preference. I like the functionality of the date, but also appreciate the clean look of the no-date. Quote:
Quote:
|
||
16 February 2019, 09:29 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 21
|
Bumping this thread to see if anybody has additional opinions between 5513, 16610, 16800, and 168000 (information online implies that all of the last 3 were made/sold in 1988, though I am not sure that is 100% accurate).
I don't see significant differences between the 16610, 16800, and 168000 during this time period so any reason not to go with whichever is cheapest (which I think is the 16610?). The 5513 has the clean look, but I prefer having the scratch resistance of sapphire. |
1 March 2019, 08:25 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1
|
Here is the story about my 5513 as a reference.
Rolex 5513 Serial # R90XXXX I purchased mine at the Rolex Store in Geneva Switzerland on January 11th 1989. At the time this trip for my brother and I as French Canadians living in Montreal was tremendous we stayed in Europe from Jan 1st to the 28th. My brother certified me as crazy spending $660 CAN to buy this watch…. He has since readjusted his statement from crazy to lucky!!!! It was however a big investment for this 24 year old at the time. I have never regretted it and the watch has been with me through thick and thin. All that is left from that trip are awesome memories and a terrific watch!!!!! Thanks, GL |
1 March 2019, 08:35 AM | #17 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,586
|
Quote:
That’s more than a watch, it’s a companion.
__________________
”When citizens learn to vote themselves the treasury, they limit prosperity.” |
|
1 March 2019, 08:57 AM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 385
|
Quote:
|
|
1 March 2019, 09:38 AM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,399
|
Quote:
To sum it up, I would look for the best condition and most correct watch from this era as you can not really go wrong with any of the 3. As far as the 5513 goes, I would look for an earlier version and opt for a matte dial thus putting it beyond your birth year watch. Good luck in your search and be patient. You will not see 168000 come up that often compared to the 16800 and 16610.
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
|
1 March 2019, 09:50 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,401
|
That’s a beautiful 5513 glh64.
__________________
126710BLRO-0001 / 116610LV / Silver Snoopy / PAM24 / PAM111 |
1 March 2019, 09:51 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,399
|
I did a little digging and found some pics.
The first is a shot of the dial on my 168000 (the crystal is a little dirty ) The second is my 16800, 168000 and 16610
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
1 March 2019, 12:04 PM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 2,030
|
5513,no question.
|
1 March 2019, 12:07 PM | #23 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,157
|
Quote:
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
|
1 March 2019, 01:25 PM | #24 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
|
Quote:
Quote:
Similar reason as to why I love the matte 16800, just the opposite. |
||
1 March 2019, 01:37 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: GMT+8
Watch: GMT 1675
Posts: 165
|
How these 3 references look & wear, is pretty subjective to the individual, so it's difficult to comment on this point.
If collectibility is important to you, then the 5513 makes most sense. On the other hand, the 16800 & 16610 are still pretty good buys these days if you want a lower entry point into future collectibility. |
2 March 2019, 05:57 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 2,204
|
|
2 March 2019, 07:12 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Nathan
Location: Denver, CO
Watch: Too many
Posts: 1,008
|
|
2 March 2019, 07:40 AM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,344
|
Out of these....I'm thinking the 5513 is more iconic. But a triple 6 would be a good choice also (16660).
|
2 March 2019, 11:11 AM | #29 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 6,174
|
1988 5513 vs 168000 vs 16610
|
2 March 2019, 08:00 PM | #30 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,586
|
Much appreciated ! This one has moved on to a fellow TRF member now.
__________________
”When citizens learn to vote themselves the treasury, they limit prosperity.” |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.