ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

pitterpatter · 3 July 2008, 12:17 PM

what do you beleive would be a better buy as far as holding its value as well as increasing in value a 1965 non date 5513 sub on strap, or a nice 1969 1675 gmt with bracelet.brian.

3266 · 1 April 2009, 05:30 AM

5513 All Day Long

Rebel · 1 April 2009, 05:43 AM

5513.

CharlieG · 5 April 2009, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3266

5513 All Day Long

I agree

onkyo · 5 April 2009, 03:15 PM

Pitterpatter is a thief and stole a watch from TTG.

3 July 2008, 12:17 PM	#1
pitterpatter Banned Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: brian Location: scottsdale Watch: pam 88 Posts: 70	whats your opinion what do you beleive would be a better buy as far as holding its value as well as increasing in value a 1965 non date 5513 sub on strap, or a nice 1969 1675 gmt with bracelet.brian.

1 April 2009, 05:43 AM	#3
Rebel "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail Location: New Albany Watch: Tudor Sub 75090 Posts: 8,066	5513. __________________ ------------------------------- Member of the Nylon Nation

1 April 2009, 05:30 AM	#2
3266 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Dan Location: London Watch: Rolex Posts: 125	5513 All Day Long

5 April 2009, 03:15 PM	#5
onkyo Banned Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Pav Location: Manhattan Posts: 11,495	Pitterpatter is a thief and stole a watch from TTG.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)