ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Antonio · 18 November 2007, 10:52 AM

Im very inexpert, but this watch does look like a fake for me. What do you think?

http://cgi.ebay.es/GMT-MASTER-II-100...QQcmdZViewItem

marshallr47 · 18 November 2007, 10:55 AM

Hard to say. The photos are difficult to distinguish whether or not it's real or fake. Sorry.

Ed Rooney · 18 November 2007, 10:56 AM

Bad fake.

SPACE-DWELLER · 18 November 2007, 10:57 AM

Yes, that is a fake:

To name the most obvious signs on this one:

Rim of the dial markers are too thick.
Dial font is too silver coloured and printed, not painted.

Ed Rooney · 18 November 2007, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER

Yes, that is a fake:

To name the most obvious signs on this one:

Rim of the dial markers are too thick.
Dial font is too silver coloured and printed, not painted.

Bingo. The borders of the indices are too thick, however the newer replicas have fixed that problem.

Letsgodiving · 18 November 2007, 11:02 AM

The cyclops looks crooked and the endlinks don't line up well.

karmatp · 18 November 2007, 11:27 AM

I don't speak or read the language but someone should report it to fleabay. We need to start reporting all these fakes, some poor dude is going to get screwed and if we can all help prevent it ..we should.

Robb · 18 November 2007, 11:28 AM

The clasp is also wrong. This one has the larger clasp like the one that comes on the sub!

Attila · 18 November 2007, 11:40 AM

Is the sweep second hand too short as well?

knoffie · 18 November 2007, 12:10 PM

you are joking aren't you??? A possible fake? You coulds pot that as a fake from 20 feet away! Its just werong. the colour of the bezel is wrong. The crown guards are wrong. its looks so tinny it screams $20.00
Dont waste your time
Knoffie

ashu2289 · 18 November 2007, 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER

Yes, that is a fake:

To name the most obvious signs on this one:

Rim of the dial markers are too thick.
Dial font is too silver coloured and printed, not painted.

mike · 18 November 2007, 12:21 PM

Well, in addition to whats already been said the bezel insert is terrible. Actually there's nothing right about the whole thing LOL!

dweller · 18 November 2007, 01:00 PM

pretty cool that's it's stamped as a 16700 with a 16710 dial!

Complete garbage..

GMTIIwanted · 18 November 2007, 01:01 PM

The word "date" on a real one is left justified to the right edge of the X in Rolex. On this one the fonts are all wrong.

glocati · 18 November 2007, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dweller

pretty cool that's it's stamped as a 16700 with a 16710 dial!

Complete garbage..

A 16700 with SEL bracelet/no holes as well..yep most def. a sketchy deal.

Antonio · 18 November 2007, 01:33 PM

I have emailed the seller about it, regarding and telling him my first opinions a few. I got an email from him (he got the watch as a gift without papers

), and he told me that he didnt know all those things, and he is going to remove the auction

mikey · 18 November 2007, 01:34 PM

fake

marshallr47 · 18 November 2007, 04:15 PM

Boy, that's scary. I own a GMT II and didn't know these things. I need to pay more attention. Thanks guys for pointing things out.

Gaijin · 18 November 2007, 05:18 PM

I love how they always attatch a tag to it to make it look half ass authentic. Sadly some people probably see the tag and fall for it.

jac67 · 18 November 2007, 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER

Yes, that is a fake:

To name the most obvious signs on this one:

Rim of the dial markers are too thick.
Dial font is too silver coloured and printed, not painted.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike

Well, in addition to whats already been said the bezel insert is terrible. Actually there's nothing right about the whole thing LOL!

Yep !

John.

18 November 2007, 10:52 AM	#1
Antonio "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: Antonio Location: Spain Watch: Rolex DJ 16030 Posts: 304	Possible fake Im very inexpert, but this watch does look like a fake for me. What do you think? http://cgi.ebay.es/GMT-MASTER-II-100...QQcmdZViewItem

18 November 2007, 10:55 AM	#2
marshallr47 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Real Name: Ron Location: Alabama Watch: Daytona,TT Sub,GMT Posts: 4,673	Hard to say. The photos are difficult to distinguish whether or not it's real or fake. Sorry. __________________ Ron

18 November 2007, 10:57 AM	#4
SPACE-DWELLER "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Bo Location: Denmark Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 22,436	Yes, that is a fake: To name the most obvious signs on this one: Rim of the dial markers are too thick. Dial font is too silver coloured and printed, not painted. __________________ With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...

18 November 2007, 11:28 AM	#8
Robb 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Real Name: Robb Location: USA Watch: BLNR Posts: 4,937	The clasp is also wrong. This one has the larger clasp like the one that comes on the sub! __________________ 126610LN l 166610LV l 126619LB l 116710BLNR l 126710BLRO l 126720VTNR l 126718GRNR l 116500 white l 116500 black l 116508 john mayer l 116519LN l 116503 white l 126655 l 226627 Ti Master

18 November 2007, 12:10 PM	#10
knoffie "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Paul Location: Australia Watch: sub 14060M cosc Posts: 174	possible fake you are joking aren't you??? A possible fake? You coulds pot that as a fake from 20 feet away! Its just werong. the colour of the bezel is wrong. The crown guards are wrong. its looks so tinny it screams $20.00 Dont waste your time Knoffie

18 November 2007, 10:56 AM	#3
Ed Rooney "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Annapolis, MD Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600 Posts: 5,081	Bad fake.

18 November 2007, 11:02 AM	#6
Letsgodiving "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Mike Location: Virginia, US Watch: SD 16600 Posts: 4,310	The cyclops looks crooked and the endlinks don't line up well.

18 November 2007, 11:27 AM	#7
karmatp "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Trevor Location: Arizona Posts: 5,740	I don't speak or read the language but someone should report it to fleabay. We need to start reporting all these fakes, some poor dude is going to get screwed and if we can all help prevent it ..we should.

18 November 2007, 11:40 AM	#9
Attila Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Attila Location: VIC AUS Watch: GMT/Explorer/Sptfr Posts: 320	Is the sweep second hand too short as well?

18 November 2007, 12:21 PM	#12
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	Well, in addition to whats already been said the bezel insert is terrible. Actually there's nothing right about the whole thing LOL!

18 November 2007, 01:00 PM	#13
dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: usa Posts: 249	pretty cool that's it's stamped as a 16700 with a 16710 dial! Complete garbage..

18 November 2007, 01:01 PM	#14
GMTIIwanted "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: USA Watch: GMT II Posts: 10	The word "date" on a real one is left justified to the right edge of the X in Rolex. On this one the fonts are all wrong.

18 November 2007, 01:33 PM	#16
Antonio "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: Antonio Location: Spain Watch: Rolex DJ 16030 Posts: 304	I have emailed the seller about it, regarding and telling him my first opinions a few. I got an email from him (he got the watch as a gift without papers ), and he told me that he didnt know all those things, and he is going to remove the auction

18 November 2007, 01:34 PM	#17
mikey "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: USA Watch: Oysterdate 6694 Posts: 2,713	fake

18 November 2007, 04:15 PM	#18
marshallr47 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Real Name: Ron Location: Alabama Watch: Daytona,TT Sub,GMT Posts: 4,673	Boy, that's scary. I own a GMT II and didn't know these things. I need to pay more attention. Thanks guys for pointing things out. __________________ Ron

18 November 2007, 05:18 PM	#19
Gaijin 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Japan Watch: ing your back. Posts: 16,181	I love how they always attatch a tag to it to make it look half ass authentic. Sadly some people probably see the tag and fall for it.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)